ON VIDEO-
.Was it a fake clock?
.Joan of Arc
.Montanism
.Russia, Syria and U.S.
.Eugenics
.Agincourt
.Planned parenthood
JOAN OF ARC- I mentioned her on the video- and did a
document search of my past teaching- and realized I never wrote about her.
So- Joan was part of what we call the mystics- these were
Christians who had supernatural experiences with God.
The common life movement was big into this- the most famous
being Thomas A Kempis.
I have his famous book ‘the Imitation of Christ’- a classic.
So- Joan was a young Catholic girl who had visions and
related some of the things I’m teaching in revelation to what she felt God
showed her.
She claimed Michael the archangel appeared to her.
She convinced a prince from France that God told her to
fight the English [they raided northern France].
And to everyone’s surprise- she won!
She actually dressed in White armor and road a White horse
into battle [all images we see in the book of Revelation].
Joan was tried for
witchcraft and heresy and burned at the stake in 1431- at the age of 19.
Yet she remained a popular figure- and the Catholic Church
canonized her as a saint in 1920.
BATTLE OF ANGICOURT- One of the more famous battles of the
100 years’ war- Henry the 5th defeated the French in Northern France
against great odds.
The use of the Longbow by the English played a major factor
giving the reality that the French outnumbered the English.
Yet when it was all said and done England took ground from
the French and France lost around 6,000
men- English troops about 400.
The battle took place on October 25th- 1415.
PAST POSTS [verses below]-
(1375) SOCIAL EVOLUTION- As I have been doing some blogging
on other sites over the science of evolution, I thought it would be good to do
a little on the philosophical ideas that spawned from it. Many sincere people
do not realize the bias that comes along with a full embrace of a purely
materialistic approach to life. There once was a woman named Margaret Sanger,
she was a strong believer in Evolution and its sister science, Eugenics.
Eugenics was an idea espoused by a relative of Darwin that taught that if you ‘quickened’ evolution by
eliminating the so called ‘inferior races’ by human action, that this would
advance the purer races faster and man would arrive at his Utopian state
quicker. Darwin himself used the Black Aborigines tribes as an example of the
inferiority of the ‘lesser races’. He looked at them as an in between race of
people who were not fully human [like the white race] but were sort of a mix
between man and ape. Anyway Sanger developed this idea to the point we she set
up an organization that would assist the inferior races in the rush to
eliminating their offspring; less child bearing, the quicker the more noble
whites would advance. She received praise from another man who believed in the
same principle, Adolph Hitler. After WW2 it became quite unpopular to continue
to associate her organization with a megalomaniac who also carried out the same
plan with the Jews, so she renamed her organization- today we know it as
Planned Parenthood. Now as hard as this is to believe, the facts on this have
been out there for many years. This is also why many advocates for minorities
are upset that the planned parenthood clinics are located in poor minority
areas, they see this as an attempt to get rid of minorities. The point today is
the social construct of evolutionary theory has had disastrous effects; from
biblical theology [documentary theory advanced by Wellhausen- he taught that
the bible followed the ‘evolutionary model’ of mans advance from primitive
religions to Monotheism, an idea espoused by the philosopher Hegel] to the
public school systems embrace of evolution as the answer to all things from
biology to cosmology. When Christians advocate a progressive-theistic
evolutionary model, and when they do a worldwide ‘Darwin week’ [like we just
did!] we need to also recognize the
social effects of Darwinism as well as the scientific advances that some
believe have been made thru the theory.
(1344) THE WEEK IN REVIEW- Okay, we had lots happening this
past week; the tragic earthquake in Haiti, estimates are that there might be
around 100,000 deaths, tragic indeed. The firestorm from MSNBC over the
comments made by Pat Robertson, he said Haiti made a deal with the devil to get
free from French rule and that all has gone bad since, not to smart of a
statement. And there is a possible upset for the democratically held seat of
former senator Ted Kennedy, the Republican [Scott] might beat the Democrat
[Coakley] this would be a major disaster for the Democrats. First, Haiti is a
[these are all parts of posts from the past]
Yes- the Ottoman Turks did slaughter many Armenians-
Christians- at the time. And getting Turkey to officially admit this has been a
problem for years. But France passing a law to make it a crime to deny it-
while they just finished committing ‘crimes against humanity’ themselves- by
killing all the Libyan civilians- it’s just too much.
Okay- let’s start a brief overview of some church history.
Over the next few weeks I want to hit on the 16th century Protestant
reformation and try and cover some of the key figures of the movement.
Martin Luther- the German reformer who had the most
influence in the movement was born and raised in Germany.
As a boy his parents were peasant farmers and eventually his
dad became a miner and became a very successful businessman- he would go on and
eventually own 6 foundries.
He sent his son to law school- and young Luther excelled. At
the age of 21 he accomplished more than many of his peers. One day on his way
home from the university a thunderstorm broke out and Luther was almost struck
by a bolt of lightning.
In fear he cried out to Saint Ann [the mother of Mary] and
said ‘Saint Ann- if you save me I will become a monk’ [Ann was the patron Saint
for miners- thus Luther was familiar with her].
He was spared and off to the monastery he went. Luther
eventually became an ordained priest and even though his dad initially was
upset that his son became a priest- yet he was proud of his boy later on.
Luther would eventually make a Pilgrimage to Rome- on foot
[a few month walk from Germany to Rome!] and what he saw devastated him. Rome-
and the Vatican- were in bad shape. Many of the priests lived in open sin- and
the city that he saw as his headquarters for the faith- well it was a mess.
Luther made the famous penitent walk/crawl up the stairs of
the Lateran church [this church was the most famous church before the
construction of St. Peters. The actual stairs of the church are the same stairs
that Christ walked up during his trial under Pontius Pilate. Yes- you hear many
‘stories’ while studying church history- things like the relics or left over
pieces of the Cross- well these stories are usually fake. But the stairs of the
Lateran church are indeed the same stairs that Christ walked on- the early
‘church’ builders dismantled the stairs at Pilate’s court in Jerusalem and
installed them at this church building in Rome].
When Luther got to the top of the stairs- it is reported
that he questioned the faith- he had a crisis of faith and thought that maybe
the whole thing was a sham.
Okay- as we do a few more posts over the coming weeks- I
want you guys to see that the main players of the Reformation were sincere
Catholic men who had many questions about what they saw as corrupt in their own
church. These men did not want to start a breakaway church- they simply wanted
to reform the church they loved.
Keep in mind that Luther excelled during his legal studies-
he had a keen legal mind- this will be important later on when we see the
debates he has with Rome over the doctrine of Justification by faith- the
letters of the apostle Paul [Romans- Galatians] use lots of legal language- and
his early education will help him in these debates.
Okay- that’s it for today. Maybe do a Google search on
Luther and familiarize yourself a little with the history.
The ‘readings’ for this week are 2nd Samuel 6-7
and Psalms 89. See what they have in common.
Because our bibles were written in Greek [which shows you
how strong the Greek influence effected the early church- our first New
Testaments were written in Greek- though the Roman Empire was the world Empire
of the day.
But Alexander the Great- the famed Greek conqueror who came
a few centuries before Christ- he instituted what we refer to as Helenization.
A form of conquering where you let the people you conquer
keep their culture- but you also use parts of your culture [in this case the
Greek language] to permeate the vanquished.
So- the Roman Empire of Jesus day [who at one time were
under the rule of the Greek Empire] continued to write in Greek.
It wasn’t until around a few centuries after the time of
Christ that the first Latin bible was written [by Saint Jerome].
But even his bible [the Latin Vulgate] used the Greek Old
Testament [called the Septuagint] instead of the Hebrew- for his Latin
translation.
Ok- the point being- the Greek world did indeed have a
strong influence on the early church.
And the church had to refute the belief that all matter was
evil.
The Christian doctrine of creation [developed under saint
Augustine- the 4th-5th century bishop of Hippo- North
Africa].
Was the teaching that matter was good- that God created the
material realm- so it is not inherently
evil.
But- after the fall of man [Genesis 1-3] a curse did indeed
come upon the earth [some times when the bible says ‘the world’ it is speaking
of the earth- but other times it is speaking of the fallen order- the sinful
realm of man. That’s why there is some confusion- till this day- among
Christians. They might read verses like this- and think the bible is saying the
earth itself- the planet- is wicked. Actually in those verses it is speaking
about the fallen order of sinful men. See? ‘For all that is in THE WORLD- the
lust of the flesh- the lust of the eyes and the pride of life- is not of the
father- but is of the WORLD- and the WORLD is passing away’- this is one
example from the epistle of John- here the World is not saying the planet- but
the world of sinful man- a fallen ‘world’ order.]
So- in conclusion [if I ever get there!] we- as believers-
reject the belief that all matter is evil.
No- man was created in the image of God- and God is the
creator of all things- both visible [earth- man- etc] and invisible [mentioned
in the above chapter].
The evil we see in the ‘world’ today is simply a result of
mans sin- mans choice to live in rebellion against God.
Renaissance means ‘re-birth’. It was a rebirth of the
ancient Poets and philosophers of days gone by. Men like Cicero and Aristotle
were once again brought to the fore front of many thinkers and lovers of
culture.
The catch phrase for the Renaissance was Ad Fontes- which
meant ‘back to the sources’ [source- Fountain- Fontes]. In the 14th
century a famous and influential Catholic family- the Medici’s- were a catalyst
for mixing this cultural movement in with the church.
The Renaissance sort of challenged the historic view of
education- up until this time most learning was done thru the prism of the
church. In the universities of the day Theology [study of God] was called the
Queen of the sciences- and philosophy was referred to as her Handmaiden.
Well the Renaissance thinkers said they wanted to study
things for what they are- they did not want to see everything thru the lens of
the church.
Eventually the theme of the movement [back to the original
sources] would play a major role in the Protestant Reformation of the 16th
century. Men like Erasmus [the famous 16th century Catholic
Humanist] would re discover the original Greek New testament- and it was thru
the study of the Greek text that many of the Reformers made their case to get
‘back to the bible’ and eventually break from Rome.
This was also the beginning period of modern capitalism.
Recently when Libya had her ‘civil war’ and the new leaders started talking
about a new constitution- one of the interesting things that came up was they
wanted to do away with interest on loans.
Why? Well Muslims teach that interest itself is a bad thing.
‘Gee- wonder where they get that idea from John’ Oh- from a little book- called
the bible.
Yes- to the surprise of some- this is very much taught in
the Old Testament. Now- it was God’s law governing the nation of Israel- but
they were forbidden to charge interest.
‘So John- is it wrong for us today to make interest’? Not
really- Jesus used interest [usury] as an example in some of his parables- and
overall- we as believers are not under the Old Testament laws that govern
natural Israel.
But- for many centuries- the world did not see interest on
money as a legitimate way to earn a living. So during the Renaissance you also
had the rise of exploration- and explorers like Columbus would go on their
voyages with the financial backing of investors.
The normal rate for these voyages was a 75/25% cut. When the
explorer returned- the investor [Spain- or whoever] got 75% of the goods- and
the explorer kept 25.
So there were a lot of changes taking place in the world at
the time- and the rise of modern capitalism was one of them- money of course
existed way before this time- but as a commodity- this was a new way of viewing
the world.
Okay- just thought I would throw in a little history along
with the current events of the day. As we see the current turmoil in the
Italian markets [the original renaissance started in Florence- Italy] maybe
seeing money/interest as a commodity- and ‘usury’ as a major way to increase
ones wealth- well maybe that’s not such
a smart way to do things after all.
When Jon Corzine's global investment firm went bust the
other day- it was a direct result of taking a gamble on the ‘gullibility’ of
the common man.
What his firm did was they took a huge risk by investing in
European bonds- bonds from Greece that everyone knew was a terrible 'bet’. Then
why did he do it?
RENAISSANCE STUFF -
The renaissance was the
13-14th century revival of culture and learning that was lost for
centuries- It began in Florence Italy.
The catch phrase for it was ‘Ad Fontes’ meaning ‘back to the sources’- both in
philosophy- as well as in Christian learning.
This began a revival of studying the Greek New testament again
from its original language.
The Catholic Humanist- Desiderius Erasmus [15-16th
century] - re introduced the New Testament in the Greek version [He was referred
to as a Dutch renaissance Humanist- as well as a Catholic Priest and scholar]
Now- Erasmus was a critic of the Church- like Luther- but chose a
‘middle road’- he did not join the breakaway Protestant Reformers- but chose to
stay within the fold of Rome- while speaking out against the abuses he saw.
But his first Greek translation of the New Testament did indeed
set a spark- because it allowed the Priests to see the bible in its original
language.
And Luther was actually teaching this book of Romans to his
students in Germany when the Reformation began.
Today the Catholic Church [as you can see in the official
Catechism that I have been posting] does indeed teach the bible as God’s Word.
The divisions between Protestants and Catholics are many- but they
did agree that the bible was the Word of God.
Some Protestants do not know this- they think the church holds
Tradition higher than the bible.
No- the church does believe that God speaks both thru tradition-
and scripture.
They see the tradition of the church as simply another means by
which God uses the church [Magisterium] to explain scripture- but the Catholic
Church does not elevate tradition over the bible.
And indeed- it was a catholic scholar- Erasmus- who introduced the
first Geek version of the New Testament.
NOTE- Erasmus disagreed with Luther on the doctrine of
Predestination- which I covered in the last video. Luther was for it- Erasmus
was what we would call ‘Free Will’.
In his writings- which were very influential- he wrote in Greek
and Latin- the language of the elites.
He did this on purpose- for his target was the influential leaders
of the Church.
He rejected offers of money- because he did not want to align
himself with any particular movement- so he could be an independent writer with
no strings attached.
He had many criticisms of the Catholic Church- and was very
influential for the later reforms- those we see at the Council of Trent [Though
the church criticized him- they said he ‘Laid the egg that hatched the
Reformation’].
He taught that the church/priests/popes should be the servants of
the people-
He rejected the idea that the Priests/leaders made up the ‘whole
of the church’- but he believed all believers made up the true church.
Erasmus was a firebrand in his own way- rejecting the language
that Luther and some of the reformers used [they were vulgar at times]-
Luther respected the works of Erasmus- he thanked Erasmus for
debating with him on the nature of Justification by Faith-
He disagreed in the end- but said this debate was at the heart of
the gospel- and was glad that Erasmus was willing to engage.
RENAISSANCE ARTISTS-
The famous renaissance artists- DaVinci- Michelangelo- Raphael-
used their artwork as a form of knowledge- the images taught things- they were
not just paintings.
DaVinci’s most famous work was his painting on the ceiling of the
Sistine chapel in the Vatican.
It took him 4 years to complete.
The renaissance period- from about the 13/14th century
to the 17th- [though there was a sort of Renaissance that took
place- yes- in the Islamic world before the European Renaissance] was marked by
what we term Humanism.
Today we associate this term with ‘secular Humanism’ which often
has a bad connotation- especially among Christians.
But it meant something different back then.
It was a new focus on breaking the limits off of man- and for man
to excel in knowledge and skill- and to see man as having value.
There was somewhat of a break away from the church in a sense- in
that the church and its teachings were not the only source of wisdom for man.
But- Jesus himself taught that ‘the Sabbath was made for man- not
man for the Sabbath’- so- the Humanist spirit- elevating the value of man- does
have a Christian basis in my view.
Leonardo daVinci [15/16th century] was what we refer to
as a true Renaissance man- meaning his knowledge was in many fields- not just
art.
He actually considered himself a sculptor first- then an artist-
though he is most famous for his Fresco mentioned above.
1990
Justification detaches man from sin which contradicts the love
of God, and purifies his heart of sin. Justification follows upon God’s
merciful initiative of offering forgiveness. It reconciles man with God. It
frees from the enslavement to sin, and it heals. (1446, 1733)
1991
Justification is at the same time the acceptance of God’s righteousness through
faith in Jesus Christ. Righteousness (or “justice”) here means the rectitude of
divine love. With justification, faith, hope, and charity are poured into our
hearts, and obedience to the divine will is granted us. (1812)
1992
Justification has been merited for us by the Passion of Christ who
offered himself on the cross as a living victim, holy and pleasing to God, and
whose blood has become the instrument of atonement for the sins of all men.
Justification is conferred in Baptism, the sacrament of faith. It conforms us
to the righteousness of God, who makes us inwardly just by the power of his mercy.
Its purpose is the glory of God and of Christ, and the gift of eternal life:40 (617, 1266, 294)
But now
the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from law, although the law
and the prophets bear witness to it, the righteousness of God through faith in
Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: since all have
sinned and fall short of the glory of God, they are justified by his grace as a
gift, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as
an expiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s
righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former
sins; it was to prove at the present time that he himself is righteous and that
he justifies him who has faith in Jesus.41
1993
Justification establishes cooperation between God’s grace and man’s
freedom. On man’s part it is expressed by the assent of faith to the
Word of God, which invites him to conversion, and in the cooperation of charity
with the prompting of the Holy Spirit who precedes and preserves his assent: (2008, 2068)
When God
touches man’s heart through the illumination of the Holy Spirit, man himself is
not inactive while receiving that inspiration, since he could reject it; and
yet, without God’s grace, he cannot by his own free will move himself toward
justice in God’s sight.42
1994
Justification is the most excellent work of God’s love made
manifest in Christ Jesus and granted by the Holy Spirit. It is the opinion of
St. Augustine that “the justification of the wicked is a greater work than the
creation of heaven and earth,” because “heaven and earth will pass away but the
salvation and justification of the elect... will not pass away.”43 He holds also that
the justification of sinners surpasses the creation of the angels in justice,
in that it bears witness to a greater mercy. (312, 412)
1995
The Holy Spirit is the master of the interior life. By giving birth to the
“inner man,”44 justification entails
the sanctification of his whole being: (741)
Just as
you once yielded your members to impurity and to greater and greater iniquity,
so now yield your members to righteousness for sanctification.... But now that
you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the return you
get is sanctification and its end, eternal life.45
Eventually Rome would conquer the Greek kingdom and the
Jewish people were allowed to keep their culture and temple- yet they were
still a people oppressed. Hassidism [getting back to the beginning] developed
during this attempt to not lose their Jewish roots- the Pharisees of Jesus day
came from this movement.
Alexander was pretty successful in his attempt to unify
language- even though the bible [New Testament] was written by Jewish writers-
living under Roman rule- yet the original bible is written in the Greek
language.
Bible scholars till this day study the Greek language to
find the truest meaning of the actual words in the bible [I have a Greek
Lexicon sitting right in front of me].
It would take a few centuries before a Latin version
appeared on the scene [the great church father- Jerome- would produce the Latin
Vulgate].
Yet it would be the re- discovery and learning of the Greek
texts [under men like Erasmus- and the Protestant Reformers] that would lead to
the Reformation [16th century] and other movements in church
history.
[1587] OVERVIEW- Lets
over view a little today- in the last post I mentioned how we will be getting
into Marx, Freud and Nietzsche in the coming months- yet I have so many things
going on at this time that just in case I never get to them I want to lay out
some stuff. First, most challenges to the Christian faith/God- have come from
the point of view that said ‘yes- we believe that there is some being out
there- God- but we challenge the purveyors of religion and how man has used
religion to control- manipulate the masses’. It was not until the rise of these
men that the popular approach of ‘no God’ would take a foothold in the minds of
many unsuspecting ‘masses’. Before we delve into the ideas and contradictions
of these men- let me explain why most thinkers of the Enlightenment did not
take the atheistic approach- and instead opted for some form of Deism/Theism.
The original debate of ‘where did everything come from’ did not start during
the Enlightenment- it dates back as far as 4-5 centuries before Christ- the
question is obviously older- but you can read the debate taking place in the
great minds of the Greek philosophers; Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Though
the idea of God in the minds of these Greek thinkers was not the same
definition that Christianity would hold to- yet they did believe in some type
of being who for the most part was what we would think of as God- they referred
to him as The Prime Mover- a term that the great Catholic thinker Thomas
Aquinas would use in the 13th century as he too argued for the
existence of God. Okay- the Greeks taught that the universe/cosmos always
existed- and there was an initiator who started the ball rolling [motion].
Their ideas about how the solar system worked were primitive- the famous idea
espoused by Ptolemy had a sort of crystalline sphere
VERSES-
Arise, O LORD, disappoint him, cast him down: deliver my
soul from the wicked, which is thy sword: Pslams 17:13
Revelation
20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such
the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ,
and shall reign with him a thousand years.
Revelation
20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were
opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead
were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to
their works.
Ephesians 2:5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together
with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)
Ephesians 2:6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit
together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
Jeremiah 51:63 And it shall be, when thou hast made an end of
reading this book, that thou shalt bind a stone to it, and cast it into the
midst of Euphrates:
Jeremiah 51:64 And thou shalt say, Thus shall Babylon sink, and
shall not rise from the evil that I will bring upon her: and they shall be
weary. Thus far are the words of Jeremiah.
Matthew 12:1 At that time Jesus went on the
sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to
pluck the ears of corn and to eat.
Matthew
12:2 But when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto him, Behold, thy disciples
do that which is not lawful to do upon the sabbath day.Matthew 12:3 But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him;
Matthew 12:4 How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests?
Matthew 12:5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?
Matthew 12:6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.
Matthew 12:7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless.
Matthew 12:8 For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.
For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which
tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood. Heb. 7:14
Proverbs
4:7 Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy
getting get understanding.
facebook.com/john.chiarello.5
ccoutreach87.wordpress.com
Note- Do me a favor, those who read/like the posts- re-post
them on other sites as well as the site you read them on. Thanks- John.
No comments:
Post a Comment