REFORMED- ORTHODOX- CATHOLIC- A
2013
1856- FOR THE BIRDS
Late happy father’s day to all
you dads out there.
Yesterday I got up early and went to Wal Mart-
I wanted to get presents for my girls and do a kind of raffle at my oldest
daughter’s house [Bethany].
I had wanted to meet at the
beach- but I realized that plan wasn’t going to work so we ended up at her house.
I bought some nice stuff for the
kids- and had a home bingo game I bought a while back [my wife plays with her
sister- so I got them a cheap home version] and I used the thing that
turns/mixes the bingo balls in the cage- and stuck the names of my kids on the
balls.
It was silly- but they liked the
stuff.
So- after I bought the gifts I
took a ride to the beach [about 2 miles from where I live] and jumped in the
gulf- yeah- it was dad’s day- so I swam.
O- I forgot- while driving to Wal
Mart we had one of those quirky storms- and I [and everyone else] spotted a
Funnel Cloud over the bay.
I stopped and took a few
pictures- we do get them in our area- but it might be only the second time that
I spotted one live [you see them on the news at least once every year or so-
from the area].
As I was walking back to the
truck after the swim- I heard someone yell out ‘hey John’.
Sure enough it was my buddy Tim
[carpenter Tim- I wrote about him in the last few weeks].
Yeah- I have not spoken with Tim
in years- like I said- sometimes I’ll run into my homeless friends once or
twice every 2-4 years.
That was the case with Tim.
He was on his bike- and he told
me he just got back to the area.
He rode the thing to Roswell N.M.
[no joke- he’s a real bike rider!].
So we talked for about 2 hours
[yeah- was running late for the father’s day gig].
Tim shared with me all the times
the Lord provided for him on the bike ride.
At one point the weather got real
cold- and the day before he found some long John’s [thermal underwear] at a
rest stop- they were still in the bag!
He told me how this was how God
provided the whole time [a few week- month type trip].
He told me he still has a camp in
the Bluff [where I live- many years ago I used to visit Tim regularly in the camps-
many of the homeless have camps- Tim was a regular friend- I would trek thru
the brush area- maybe half a mile or so- Tim would have a nice camp set up-
he’d brew me some Folgers over an open fire].
As we were talking there at the
beach- he had some of the old Folgers coffee in his bag- sure enough he broke
it out and made some right there.
I gave Tim some money- he really
did not want to take it- then he tried to give me something of value [he had
some music C.D.’s].
I told Tim ‘no buddy- the last
few weeks I have been giving 20’s away- felt like I needed to catch up’. I was
slacking with helping the poor- so it was the lord that allowed this chance
meeting.
Tim told me he still has a camp
on the property of some rich lady who lives here in town.
He does work for her- at almost
no cost- so she lets him live there- outside!
He has told me about her in the
past- nice lady- but a staunch atheist.
You know- the type that really
lets you know they don’t believe.
He was telling me how she’s an
avid bird lover- has all the stuff on her property for birds.
I gave Tim a quick Apologetics
argument he can use with her- if he ever gets the chance.
I have written a lot about this
over the years- but let me give you the short version.
Apologetics is the field where
you argue for the existence of God- you use the proofs from science and logic
and philosophy to argue your case for the existence of God.
Okay- this is the short version.
The fact that ANYTHING EXISTS- is
proof that God exists.
How so?
For many thousands of years-
dating back to the time of the famous philosophers- Plato, Aristotle and
Socrates [5- 600 years B.C.] people who studied the universe [Cosmologists]
believed that the universe [time, matter, space- all things that make up the
physical world] had no beginning point.
Most [though not all] believed
that the universe was eternal- even the contemporary Carl Sagan said ‘the
universe is all there ever was- and all there ever will be’.
So- when Christian thinkers
argued for the existence of a creator- most used the Aristotelian argument that
said ‘God is the Prime Mover’.
Which meant- He started all
motion.
Even the great 13the century
Catholic scholar- Thomas Aquinas- used this argument.
But- in the modern era- science
has found out that yes indeed- there was in fact a time when no physical matter
existed.
We learned this in the 20th
century- men like Einstein made great breakthroughs in the field of Physics-
and they showed us that there was a time- well- when there was ‘no time’.
It would take too much to cover
this here- but men like Hubbell and a few others made some great scientific
observations that backed up Einstein’s theory- and vice versa.
So- when SCIENCE [not religion-
not bible- not ‘God talk’] showed us that all matter had a starting point- it
left the atheist in a tough spot.
If there was a time when nothing
existed- then how did everything get here?
The only logical conclusion is
something [or someone] who exists outside of the physical realm [called the
metaphysical realm] had to have been responsible for it.
Why is this the only logical
explanation?
Because things cannot come FROM
NOTHING [the ancient saying ‘out of nothing- nothing comes’].
So- we are left with the dilemma
that there was indeed a time of NO MATTER- and therefore something- outside of
the material realm- has to be responsible for it.
This is indeed- in my view- the
greatest Apologetic argument used to ‘prove’ the existence of God.
Now- some say ‘but how do we know
it’s God- maybe there is some other ‘non material’ thing/being that did this’?
Look- some of the so called ‘new
atheists’ have gone down this line of reasoning- and made fools of themselves.
One quick example.
One of the famous present day
atheists is Richard Dawkins.
He was pinned down in an
interview- and he was confronted with this dilemma.
He actually said that he thought
it was possible that some ‘being’ from another time might have made all things.
He said the being- well- would
have to be eternal [because if he isn’t- you have the problem- where did he
come from].
He said this being had to have
been very smart [you can’t get intelligence from non intelligence- this is a
scientific observation].
And this being had to be very
powerful- because he created all things.
In short- when Dawkins was done-
he described the attributes of God down to the last detail [omniscient,
omnipotent, etc.]
So- any thinking person- even an
avowed atheist- realizes the problem that they face in trying to explain the
existence of all things.
I told Tim it was ‘funny’ that
this lady loves birds- but ‘hates’ God.
The Apostle Paul said in Romans
chapter one ‘they did not want to have God in their thoughts- so God gave them
up to worship the created order- Birds, etc..’
Yeah- men who rejected the obvious
proof of God- creation- became worshippers of creation [they made idols of
animals and birds].
I found it interesting that Tim’s
bird lady was living proof that the bible is true.
I had a good time talking with
Tim- it’s been a while- he asked if he should come by the house and visit in
the upcoming weeks- I told him sure.
Tim is one of the homeless guys
who does not like to impose on people- that’s why I hardly ever see him- he
won’t even go to the free mission to eat- he avoids the whole scenario of
looking like your homeless.
He works- lives- and feels like
it’s his right to not have a home- without being looked down upon.
Well- I’ll end with that for now-
for those who want to read more about Apologetics- I have stuff on the blog you
can find- have fun.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
1855- UNFINISHED BUSINESS
First we need to take care of
some unfinished business.
Yes- I’ll admit- yesterday’s
prediction failed.
The post warned of a possible
sell off in the market [I guessed around 100 or so points- nothing real big].
But- the market went up around
100.
If I have learned anything in
life- it’s when you blow it you need to fess up- come clean- in Christian lingo ‘confess your
sins one to another- so you will be healed’ [James].
So- to all who read this site- I
have one thing to say.
My account was hacked [Anthony
Weiner?]
Okay- let’s move on.
Actually- most of everything I
posted was [is] still true.
I don’t want to do another whole
post on economics- but some analysts think the market went up- not because we
had good news [yesterday stats showed factory orders were down in May from the
previous month] but because we had bad.
Like I wrote- if investors think
things are bad- that makes them think the Fed will act [put more money into the
system] and Walla- the Dow goes up.
There are a few other things too-
like the Greek vote on Sunday [whether or not they will stay in the Euro] but
overall I still stick to my post- absent that one line that was hacked!
Okay- did we have any other ‘big’
news yesterday?
There were a few things- some
‘bigger’ than the media [or the administration] would like us to know.
The president did a funny thing
yesterday- he sent a letter to congress saying he ‘declassified’ info about our
terror [drone] campaign in Yemen.
This is the first time he did
this [as far as we know?] since he’s been in office.
Why does this really look
suspicious?
His administration is under
criticism right now- it looks like they have indeed been ‘leaking’ these
stories to the press.
The whole recent scandal of
national security leaks.
Of course he has denied it.
But- if he [and his political
people] were behind it- then they obviously had a strategy about how much would
come out each month.
This ‘late Friday’ release- seems
to go along with this theory- it looks funny to me.
The president also did his
‘kinda’ executive order- by giving some type of cover to some illegal aliens.
For the record- I’m liberal when
it comes to this subject [for those who think I’m too far right!]
I want for our nation to work out
some type of deal for the kids of illegal’s- who were young when they came to
the country- who are in school- basically grew up just like you and me- I don’t
want these kids to be afraid of getting sent back.
I also realize the need to have
some type of border enforcement- I just want to say I’m not against the
principle that that the Pres laid out.
Of course it was politically
timed- I mean you’re in office for 3.5 years- and now you do it.
In actuality there really is more
‘politics’ to it than meets the eye.
When the president’s real plan
for immigration was shot down- The Freedom Act- he simply blamed it on the
Repubs.
But something unsuspected happened.
Marco Rubio [the Cuban American
Republican from Florida- possible V.P. pick for Romney] began working on a
Repub plan to allow the minor kids of illegal’s to stay in the country.
The same basic thing that Obama
wanted to do.
Okay- to the surprise of some- he
seems to have convinced enough fellow Repubs to sign on.
Now- the part you don’t see is
this.
What the Pres did- and the other
Democrats- was they saw how bad it would look if the Repubs actually passed a
law that favored immigrants- that if Rubio succeeds- than it will look like
they did something Obama was not able to do- pass immigration reform.
So behind the scenes Obama and
the Dems have been telling fellow Dems ‘don’t agree with Rubio!’
Some have jumped ship and simply
said ‘look- we want reform- we [the Dems] had total control of the govt. for
the first 2 years- you [our leader- Obama] spent all your capital on health
care- so we don’t care if it’s Rubio- we simply want TO HELP THE KIDS AND GET
THE REFORM DONE’.
Okay- that sounds principled to
me.
So- Obama realized he was gonna
look bad if the Rubio thing goes thru- and he came out- after 3 and a half
years- and said ‘I must act now’.
He pulled the rug out from Rubio
[which in reality hurt the long term solution- which would have been much
better for the Hispanic kids].
And gave an ‘order’ to Janet
Napolitano [the lady that oversees the immigration laws] and said ‘put a 2 year
hold on deporting the kids of Immigrants’.
Now- there’s more to it- but this
is the short story.
It really would have been better
to just let the Rubio idea pass- because the new plan from the Pres still
leaves the kids in limbo- they simply get 2 years to not get deported.
That’s politics.
Okay- lets end the week with a
few verses.
I have been reading Isaiah
chapters 26- 30.
Some notable verses ‘your dead
sons will arise- together with MY DEAD BODY shall they arise’.
This week the more
historic/traditional churches celebrated the Eucharist [communion- the actual
term means Thanksgiving].
This past Sunday was a church
memorial that always sticks in my mind each year it comes up.
It’s a special day that
celebrates the Feast of Corpus Christi.
This feast is a celebration of
the Body of Christ- but because that’s the name of my city- I usually make note
of it when it comes up annually.
I like the above verse- I have
quoted it every week for years [it’s one of the many prayer verses I have
painted in my yard].
It’s a prophetic verse speaking
about both the future resurrection of all men- and it’s also speaking about the
Lords Table.
At the last Supper Jesus gave his
men [and us] an ongoing memorial of his death for us.
‘Take Eat- this is my Body’.
He broke the bread and poured the
wine.
We as believers have been keeping
this memorial for 2 thousand years.
The apostle Paul told the
Corinthians ‘as often as you do this- you do show the Lords death until he
comes back’.
I love the celebration of the
Eucharist- the Catholic scholar Scott Hahn says something I like.
He says ‘Jesus said DO THIS in
remembrance of me- not- write this’.
His point- to us ‘scholarly’
types- is that we often emphasize the bible- the written word- while Jesus told
us the doing of the memorial was what would ‘show his death’ till he comes.
I like that.
So- for you non church goers-
maybe tomorrow [or in the near future] you can make an effort and go to church
and celebrate the meal.
Isaiah said ‘your dead men shall
rise- together with my dead Body they shall live’.
Gather ‘together’ with the
confessing church- celebrate the meal- lets all live TOGETHER.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
1849- SHREK- A CITY- AND WATER
FROM A ROCK
I want to end the week with at
least some bible stuff- but let me share a few more homeless stories.
I have been getting with the guys
the past few days and have not written about it every time.
A few notable things.
I heard that Chris- a homeless
friend for many years- drove to Louisiana with another friend [a former ship
captain- a Greek].
And Chris actually got a
machinists job making 15 bucks an hour.
I was happy to hear the great
news.
I have written about Chris
before- he always told me he was a machinist- I think from the classic
Youngstown area [Ohio- Springsteen’s famous song].
One day I had Chris over at the
house.
My dad gave me these antique
boxes of his father’s machinist tools many years ago.
As I kid I used to go thru the
boxes in my garage [for any of my old friends who read the site- do you
remember these tools?]
So when Chris saw them- he knew
them like a carpenter knows a hammer.
So I knew he wasn’t making the
whole ‘I’m a machinist’ thing up.
But I also could tell that Chris-
like most of the street guys- has some type of mental problem.
So I never knew if he really was
as good as he made it sound. But after
hearing that he got hired- I was glad.
Dirk [another long time friend- a
good friend] has been messing with the radiator on his van the last few days.
He lives in the van- I see it
parked in the various parking lots on a rotating basis.
Dirk claims to be ‘a winter
Texan’ sort of like he’s a retired tourist guy.
But the truth is- he is homeless-
has been for years.
Anyway- he needed a ride to the
other side of town to buy a new radiator- I obliged.
Henry went with us- Henry loves
the fellowship- he’s the scholar friend- homeless too- but he picks my brain
lots.
Dirk offered to give me 5 bucks
for gas- it was about a 10 mile trek.
But I told him ‘no way’.
About half way back- he realizes
he left his cell phone at the shop.
I was like ‘how did you do that-
I never put my cell phone on a table at a store- when I’m done- it goes in my
pocket’.
Any way- I told Dirk ‘don’t
worry- we’ll get it’.
I kinda felt like taking the 5
bucks now- but let it slide [I have been giving the guys change from 20’s the
last couple of weeks- I try to ‘spread the wealth around’ Obama style!]
Yesterday I helped Tammy [I do
usually give Tammy a few dollars every time I see her].
Tammy is a ‘working girl’.
Her and her boyfriend [Shrek] are
Meth addicts.
It’s funny- I have been giving
Tammy a few dollars for years.
Someone gave her a girls bike
yesterday- but she had to pick it up [a lady at the mission gave it to her for
some yard work she did- Tammy was going to give it to a friend’s daughter for
an upcoming birthday].
So I told Tammy ‘I’ll pick it up
for you and put it in the truck’.
She was going to walk over and
ride it home [home- her and Shrek are staying in some broken down trailer].
I do realize it looks like I’m a
‘customer’ I mean I give the girl dollars- and then a ride.
I don’t really care to be honest-
but I do see how people could talk.
Anyway- when we dropped the bike
off- I saw Shrek [he’s a big kid- around 35 years’ old- 300 lbs].
He’s really a nice kid.
I gave him and Tammy a nice tent
once.
They were living in the brush at
the time and the tent was a 2 person size- a nice one I bought from wal mart.
They never forgot that.
Shrek was glad to see me- it’s
been a while.
Okay- let me cover Deuteronomy
chapter 4.
I have been reading it this week
[it was a chapter from the Mass this past Sunday].
Moses is going over the story of
the Jewish people right before they enter the Promised Land.
He tells them that God did a
great work by leading them out of Egypt and being with them all this time.
A few points.
Moses tells them that God was
angry with him and because of this he will not ‘go in and take the land’.
This 'anger’ moment was when God
told Moses to speak to the Rock when the people were complaining of thirst.
For you ‘non bible readers’ this
would be when Charlton Hesston delivered the people form Egypt and they went
thru the Red sea and were in the wilderness.
At various times Moses loses his
temper with the Jewish people.
This Rock incident was the one
time God said ‘okay- that’s it Moses- you blew it one too many times- you can’t
go in to the land’.
Moses was to speak to the Rock
and water would come out.
He got mad- and struck the Rock-
twice- with his famous rod.
The water came out.
Which was a type of ‘God striking
the Rock’ [Jesus was punished for us on the Cross- Isaiah 53 says it pleased
THE LORD to bruise him- God punished his Son on our behalf- Jesus was ‘the
rock’ that the water flowed from [a symbol of the Holy Spirit]. On the Cross a
soldier put a spear in the side of Jesus and water came out].
So the striking of the rock was a
symbol that God would use- but striking it twice ruined the symbol.
The book of Hebrews says Jesus
was struck only once for sin- not repeatedly.
So because of this Moses could
not go in to the land.
Okay- to my bible scholars out
there- I found a verse where Moses makes it into the land.
What?
No trick [not really].
Okay- when?
In the New Testament Jesus was
transfigured before the disciples- the Mount of Transfiguration.
At the time the bible says Moses
and Elijah appeared with him.
Of course- they were in the
Promised Land at the time.
One more thing from this chapter.
It also talks about the cities of
refuge.
These were cities [3] that God
set aside- if someone accidently killed another person they could flee to the
city for safety.
At the time- if you killed
someone- the family of the dead person had the right to ‘avenge the blood’ of
their relative.
But if it was an accident- you
could run to the ‘city of refuge’ and find safety.
You had to live in the city until
the death of the high priest.
After he died- you could go back
home.
Meaning?
The 'city of refuge’ is a type of
the church- the community of God [not the building!].
We are all guilty of the innocent
Blood of Jesus [he died for us].
We can ‘flee to the city of
refuge’ and find safety from our guilt- as long as the high priest lives
[Hebrews/Romans says we are saved by his life- he lives].
We also can ‘inherit the promise’
enter back into the land- after ‘he dies’.
Jesus died- and rose again- so we
too could partake of the true inheritance- not a ‘city made with hands- but an
eternal one in the heavens’ Hebrews.
Got it?
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
1844- POPES HOMILY
Got with the homeless brothers
yesterday- found out Football Jim died a few months ago.
Sad to see him go- will write
more on Jim another time.
Spent another few hours with Mike
[few posts back- Scapegoat].
Mike shared more of his story
with me- serious [bad] stuff- he knows I’m chronicling it on the site- he’s
fine with it.
I will tell more about this also-
but not today.
What I want to do today is a post
for my Catholic friends.
Note- I have Protestant friends
who get offended when I use examples from the church- or when I watch [or every
so often attend] the Mass.
There are reasons they get upset-
and it takes time to explain why I think it’s important for me to keep in touch
with ‘the ancient church’.
For the most part- I have been a
student of church history [and the early church fathers] for the past 25 years.
It’s impossible to read deeply
into church history without having an appreciation for the older more traditional
churches.
Over time you begin to view these
churches [Catholic, Orthodox] as sort of older relatives- like an uncle or
grandpa- maybe they don’t know all the current techniques and all [like using
computers!]
But over time you realize they know
more [or are right more often] then you thought when you were younger.
So this has been my experience on
the journey.
Okay- this past Sunday I watched
the Mass on TV.
Every so often if the church is
celebrating a special memorial they will broadcast the service from Rome.
This past Sunday was Pentecost
Sunday- so I watched the Pope give the homily from Rome.
Let’s cover the main verses he
used.
The homily was good- but you have
to pay attention to the verses/chapters to get a full understanding.
The chapters quoted from were
Genesis 11, Psalms 103, Acts 2, John 16, and Galatians 5.
Because it was Pentecost Sunday
the message was on the story we find in Acts chapter 2- when the Holy Spirit
came to the church.
We read that the believers were
gathered at Jerusalem- waiting for the ‘promise of Jesus’ that he would send
them the Spirit [John 16].
When the Spirit came- all the
disciples in the upper room began speaking Gods word to the multitudes that
were gathered at Jerusalem for the special holiday.
They spoke ‘in tongues’ [unknown
languages] and the people were amazed because they all heard the message in
their own native tongue.
This was a Divine miracle that
enabled the message to spread to all the different ethnic groups that were at
the city.
After Peter preaches the gospel
to them they repent and believe and are baptized- and the ‘Lord added 3,000
SOULS’ to the church that day.
The Pope contrasted this with the story in
Genesis 11- The famous Tower of Babel.
This records the time when God divided
the people by giving them different languages.
The people were building a tower
and city that would reach ‘unto heaven’ [a symbol of mans efforts to reach God-
or be like God- on his own- Humanism].
The bible says they ‘wanted to
make a name for themselves’.
They were more interested in
‘leaving a legacy’ then in glorifying God.
God looked down and realized they
were going to unite- in a wrong way- to build this city of man.
The bible says he came down and
divided their languages in that day.
They were unable to communicate
with each other and left off ‘building the city’.
This is where we get the term
‘babble ’ from- when you can’t understand what a person’s saying- he’s
‘babbling’.
In Galatians 5 we read about the
fruit of the Spirit- and how we ‘thru the Spirit wait for the hope of
righteousness which comes by faith’ [a main theme of the Apostle Paul’s
writings].
And in John 16 we read the
promise Jesus made- that he would leave them and send ‘the comforter’- the
Spirit- and he would guide them into all truth.
So we see the contrast of the
biblical stories about language.
In Genesis 11 God divides the
languages of men because they are rebelling against him.
In Acts 2 God ‘reverses’ this
division by allowing them all to hear again in ‘one language’.
The Cross allows humanity to be
united again.
The apostle Paul writes the
Ephesians and says Jesus reconciled both groups [Jew and Gentile- which
represented the major division of the time] by dying on the Cross for all men.
And that all men [who believe]
now have ‘access to God by one Spirit’.
All in all- it was a good
message.
The purpose of the gospel is to
unite men- not divide them [I know Jesus said he came to bring division-
families would be divided- mother- father against child. In context he was
saying there was a reaction to being a follower of him. Sometimes families will
even reject a child because they choose the Christian faith. We see this today
among various religious groups.]
But the overall work of the Cross
unities men- in Christ [2 become one- Ephesians- One New Man].
And we once again can share ‘a
common language’.
The language of the Cross.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
1840- DAVID’S TENT
The other day I went thru the
gospel of Mark.
Of course there’s a whole lot in
the book- but I came across a story that I liked a lot.
In Marks gospel Jesus is with the
disciples and they are going thru the fields picking the ‘ears of corn’ [note-
you did not have corn- like we think- growing in the land at the time. They
were picking grain. But the King James Bible- 1611- which I use- did translate
the term corn].
Now- when the Pharisees saw this-
it was the Sabbath day- they accused Jesus and his men of breaking Gods law.
Jesus responded by saying ‘have
you never read the story of David when he was fleeing Saul- how he and his men
ate the sacred bread- that is not lawful for men to eat- only the priests’.
I always liked this story because
there is so much to unpack- let’s try to do a little.
Was it unlawful for the disciples
to have done this?
Not really- the Pharisees were a
group of religious leaders that rose up during the time of the captivity of the
Jews a couple hundred years before the time of Christ.
They did serve a noble purpose at
the start- they wanted to retain the culture and religious beliefs of Gods
people during a time of displacement from their own land.
So this group established the
synagogue system [sort of a Jewish ‘church’] and they would gather around on
the Sabbath day and read the scriptures and be reminded of their heritage.
Okay- what happened to these
brothers- like many other good things that meant well at the start- was after a
while they became elitist.
They saw themselves as better
than everyone else- they became judges of all other groups- and they developed
a Tradition- called ‘The Tradition of the Elders’ which was an expansion on the
law of God.
This is what Jesus often fought
against in his day- the Tradition of the Elders [not all tradition in general!]
Why is this important?
It is common in our day for many
well meaning believers- Born Again Christians- to disdain all Church tradition.
Many people [like myself] come
from a former Catholic background- and one of the first things you normally
hear is ‘look at all the bad traditions that the church taught’.
This mindset is often justified
by Jesus condemnation of the ‘Traditions of men that make void the Word of
God’.
Jesus was not throwing all
tradition under the bus- he was rebuking THIS specific tradition.
Got it?
Okay- the reason I said ‘sort of’
[at the top] was because the defense Jesus gave said ‘didn’t you read what
David did- when he ate the bread that was unlawful to eat’.
So Jesus really did not mind the
‘you broke the law’ accusation- but instead placed himself in the situation of
King David and said ‘I too have authority over the Sabbath’.
In the Jewish mind of the 1st
century- the statements like this that Jesus made [Moses said this- but I say
this] these statements meant more than meets the eye.
They meant that Jesus saw himself
as being equal with God.
If you carefully read the gospels
you see this.
To the first century Jew- this
was indeed a violation of what they were taught.
‘The Lord our God is One’.
So- Jesus defends himself and his
men by saying ‘I am Lord over the Sabbath’
Strong words indeed.
The story of David is found in
the book of Samuel.
He’s running from king Saul at
the time- and he goes to the ‘House of God’ and needs food.
The priest [Abiathar] tells him
he only has the sacred bread- which is reserved for the priests.
David makes up a story and says
he’s on a special mission from Saul and the priest gives David the bread.
He eats- and gives to his men.
Now- when Jesus uses this story
in the gospel- he does mention that David and his men both ate.
I find this interesting.
Because Jesus will sit down with
his men at the last supper and do the same thing.
He tells them ‘take eat- this is
my Body- drink- this is my Blood’.
How could Jesus ‘eat himself’?
The Bread and Wine represent the
Body and Blood of Christ.
Jesus said his meat [bread- the
thing that sustained him] was to do the will of God and finish his work.
He was sustained too by the
mission he was on- he lived to ‘give his Body and Blood’.
This mission was his life’s
purpose- he too ‘ate the Bread’.
Jesus also came from the lineage
of king David- he was a ‘son’ of David.
In the above verses- it said
‘David came to the house of God’.
We often see this as the Temple.
But remember- the temple was not
built yet.
David’s son Solomon will build it
in the future.
So what ‘house of God’ did David
come to?
It was the tabernacle [of Moses].
This was a tent type system that God gave to
the children of Israel during their wilderness journey.
It became the central place of
worship and sacrifice when they entered the promised land.
Eventually the main piece of this
tent system gets taken by Israel's enemies [They stole the Ark- the box that
held the 10 commandments].
And when David becomes king he
gets it back.
As the Ark eventually winds up
back in the hands of David- he builds another tent thing- called the Tabernacle
of David- and he places the Ark under this tent.
Now- David is king at the time-
the bible says he put on a Linen Ephod and worshipped God before this tent [he
operated as a priest- which was unlawful for kings to do- normally!].
Understand- at the same time the
Tabernacle of Moses still existed- it just did not have the Ark in it- David’s
‘new’ tent had the Ark.
This was symbolic of the New
testament King/Priesthood of Jesus.
He in essence would usher the
people into the presence of God- absent the Veil of the Temple- a covering that
existed in the Tabernacle of Moses- which represented separation from God- but
was not in the one David made.
So you see- when Jesus used David
as an example- there was more than meets the eye- much more.
[Jesus is the New Testament
King/Priest that died on the Cross- the Veil of the temple was ripped on that
day- and he now represents us before the throne of God- absent the veil- the
thing that separated man from God].
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
1834- HOW LOW WILL IT GO?
This past week I spoke with my
Liberal friend from the North- yes- a real person- not a composite!
I always try and take the middle
ground in these talks- showing my friend that to be too partisan clouds the
mind.
One example- this friend has
bought the whole media line that Romney- because of his wealth- is unfit to
serve.
That his wife does just sit on
the couch all day and does nothing- and they are unable to speak about real
issues because of this.
Now- this person voted for Kerry
a few years back.
I told my liberal friend ‘say if
you found out that Romney actually never earned his money- but he married his
wife- who also never earned it- but she inherited it from a rich father’.
And say if Romney was spending
all of his wife’s money on yachts- expensive vacation homes- and all the ritzy
stuff that Romney has [elevators for cars].
Of course my friend would be even
more mad.
Yet this is exactly what happened
to John Kerry.
He simply married a woman who was
heir to the Heinz ketchup fortune.
Okay- does this make Kerry a bad
man?
No.
But this shouldn’t make Romney a
bad man either- yet I never heard one story about Kerry being a free loader off
of his wife’s money.
The point being we get mad at the
other side- even though we allow those same things to slip by if it happens on
‘our side’.
Now- the other day I posted on
the economy- that I felt we still had a ‘long hard slog’ ahead.
Others had too rosy of a picture
in my view.
Now- economics/finances is like
anything else- you look at the data and make the best ‘guess’ possible.
When I looked at the data at the
end of last year- we had some bad signs ahead.
This year- the states and local
govts [cities- towns] were not going to have anywhere near the revenue that
they had for the past few years.
Why?
The federal govt. has cut back
much of the funding that they gave to the states.
Obama care has also put a huge
burden on the states.
One of the ways it ‘covers’ the
uninsured is to simply mandate that the states put millions of more people on
the Medicare rolls.
This is a tremendous cost to the
states- money they don’t have.
Home prices.
Housing prices have gone down- in
some places more than 50%- and the way most states/cities pay for their local
expenses [schools] is this way [property tax].
So you basically have the states
and cities having to come up with more money- and in reality they have nowhere
to get the money.
Now- last night I watched the
governor from Cali. say that the state is in almost double the debt that they
we were expecting.
California is 16 billion in debt-
not 9 billion as was projected.
Governor Brown- a smart guy- he
once studied to be a Jesuit priest- they are top of the line intellectuals
among Catholic priests.
[just as a side note- this order rose up
during the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century. A soldier by
the name of Ignatius Loyola was wounded and recovering in the hospital.
He read about the life of Christ
and dedicated himself to the Lord.
The Jesuits were the order he
founded.
They evangelized all the way into
Asia- an area that the Protestant missionaries avoided.
The Jesuits played a major role
in the scientific revolution- as a percentage of how few Jesuits there were-
they had a huge impact on the development of modern science.]
So governor Brown said his state
has lived beyond it’s means for too long- they spent money they did not have-
and now the chickens have come home to roost.
Brown is a liberal Democrat.
The governor of N.Y. said the
same thing a few months back.
When he got elected he actually
worked with the unions in the state and worked out a deal where they were going
to cut the huge expenses that the retirees managed to bargain for over the
years.
Cuomo- another Democrat- said it
was impossible for the state to continue to pay out these lavish benefits.
After the union leaders made the
deal- the rank and file rose up [like Greece] and simply elected new leaders
who would fight the changes.
I heard a clip from Cuomo- he was
yelling ‘we can’t keep making the rich/businesses pay- they are all leaving the
state’- just like Cali.
So- with unemployment at historic
highs- with state and local govts having to lay off tons of teachers and cops
and firefighters.
While the cost to the states is
going up- a lot [Obama care].
With all these things in the
hopper- besides the ‘unknowns’ like the banks [Morgan Chase] still making risky
bets.
Yes- in my view I could not see
how some financial guys were talking a huge recovery- some have said they
thought the DOW would be at 17,000 next year- nuts!
As I spoke to my liberal friend-
they said ‘so- do you think Romney would have been able to create more jobs
than Obama’!
They were mad- I said I’m really
not a Romney supporter- but being I live in oil state I know from firsthand
experience that Obama has cost us jobs.
When he got in office the
regulations and the EPA came down hard on the state- they cost lots of jobs.
I saw a clip- video- from Obama
the other day- it was from January of 2008- he said he wanted to see the cost
of opening up coal powered plants go so high that any sane business person
would simply choose not to do it.
Okay- if you have said these
things- and have actually done them- then yes- there have been very real jobs
lost because of these things.
I assume Romney would not have
done this- at least not as much as Obama.
So yes- it’s quite possible that
the president’s agenda has cost jobs.
I also explained to my friend
that many business owners have put off hiring for 3 years now- because if Obama
care passes many of them will be mandated to pay the health care- or a huge
fine- for each worker.
Now- as noble as these things
might be- they cost real jobs.
My liberal friend- who is a nice
person- has lived off of govt. programs for a long time- has only worked a real
job for a small part of life.
This person simply had no idea
how the private sector really worked- they just listen to the media talking
points- and the real world is so much different.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
1830- DO CHRISTIANS SUFFER?
This past week I read the 1st
letter of Peter [in the New Testament].
I read a chapter a day- and
meditated on some key points.
I marked all the verses that
dealt with the Christian doctrine on suffering. This teaching- found thru out
the bible- has been neglected in much of the modern type Christianity.
Many systems of preaching and
belief in our day have developed an idea that because Jesus suffered for us-
therefore we need not suffer.
I’m sure some of my readers/friends
have in some way been aware [affected?] by this- it’s almost impossible to have
not been.
Many of the number one
bestselling books [Wal mart] have these themes- most of what you would call ‘TV
Evangelists’ teach this type of thing.
And many of the most popular Mega
Churches of our day have some form of it within their ranks.
So- in the old style of actually
writing out each verse- here we go.
‘For this is thankworthy- if a
man for conscience toward God- endure grief- suffering wrongfully’
‘But if you do well and suffer
for it- and take it patiently- this is acceptable with God’
‘For even hereunto were ye
called- because Christ also suffered for us- leaving us an EXAMPLE that ye
should follow his steps’
‘But if ye suffer for
righteousness sake- happy are ye’
‘For it is better- if the will of
God be so- that ye suffer for well doing rather than evil’
‘For as much then as Christ hath
suffered in the flesh- arm yourselves likewise with the same mind’
‘If any man suffer as a
Christian- let him not be ashamed- but let him glorify God on this behalf’
‘Wherefore let them that suffer
according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well
doing- as unto a faithful creator’
‘But the God of all grace – who
hath Called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus- after that you have
suffered a while- make you perfect- stablish- strengthen- settle you’.
Okay- that’s the jist of it.
‘So why John are there so many
teachings that leave this out’?
Good question.
Many of the teachers are well
meaning people- and they do have one side of the coin.
There are many verses in the
bible that do speak about God blessing us- meeting our needs- delivering us out
of trouble.
But none of these verses ‘do
away’ with the ones I just quoted.
Peter himself said that Christ
not only died to bring us back to God [redemption] but he also suffered for us-
leaving us an example that we were to follow.
Peter says it’s better to suffer
for well doing- then for evil doing.
Yet both are redemptive in
nature.
How?
Peter’s most famous suffering
recorded in the bible is his very famous denial of Jesus.
The bible says after he did this
he wept and was broken.
He went thru pain because of his
sin- and even this suffering played a role in shaping the apostle.
Later on- we read in Christian
history that when Peter was put to death in Rome- he requested that he be
crucified upside down because he felt he was not worthy to die the same way as
his Lord.
Geez- you would think he never
got over the guilt.
Yes- the bible is clear on the
matter- there are times when we are called to suffer.
We can’t ‘confess’ our way out of
it- or ‘create our own world’ out of it.
We can’t rebuke the devil ‘out of
it’.
There are simply times when we
are called to suffer.
Now- this does not mean we sit
around every day and wait for the thing to happen- no- we are commanded by God
to take up our Cross daily and to follow him.
But the actual phrase ‘Take up
the Cross’ carries with it the idea that there is a price to pay.
Okay- what’s my goal in covering
this?
Am I trying to ‘put’ a bad
confession on you?
No- but I’m trying to show you
that if you are feeling guilty because in your mind things might not have
turned out as well as you hoped.
Maybe years ago you started well-
had good Christian friends- some who went on to ‘fame’ [Yikes!!]
Others had ‘good’ lives.
And maybe you have questioned
God- ‘what did I do wrong- why am I different’.
You’re not!
That’s the point.
One of the verses I left out was
Peter saying when you go thru these trials- don’t think it strange- but
understand that you have many brothers and sisters in the world who are also
experiencing the same pain as you feel right now.
Yeah- that’s the jist of it.
If we hold on to the
ideas/teachings- that come to us by well meaning people- encouraging people- I
mean who can dis like Joel Osteen!
But we need to balance it out
with the Word.
Yes- many of these teachings go
by the name ‘Word churches’ or ‘word people’ and I’m glad that they do quote
the word.
But the Word also contains all
these verses as well.
The Word shows us that there are
things we will go thru in life- and we should not be taken by surprise when
this happens- God told this to us from the start.
Okay- I was thinking I might
throw in a few more things about the writings of Peter- some Non Canonical
writings- the Gospel of Peter- and the Revelation of Peter [apocalypse].
Being I just ended a study form a
liberal scholar- these writings came up.
They are early Gnostic writings
that fall into the category of Pseudopigraphy [writing under the name of
another person- note- I rarely use this word because my spell check does not
have it- but I wanted you to see it- just beware I might have a letter or 2
off!].
I wanted to cover a few interesting
tid bits from them- and to explain why we do not have them in our bibles today.
But I think I'll let that wait
for another post.
For today- re-read these verses
on your own- if you haven’t read the book of Peter in a while- read it the next
few days- look for these key themes.
The other day I mentioned the
book of James.
I read it a couple of weeks ago.
I realized that I also mentioned
‘off the cuff’ that James was a leader at the first church we see in the bible-
the Jerusalem church.
In Acts 15 we read that Peter,
James and John are Pillars of the church.
They were spiritual ‘support
beams’ if you will- what they said [and say] is very important.
If you remember- when I mentioned
James I shared how he praises the poor- and warns the rich.
Here in Peter we see the biblical
doctrine of suffering.
When I get to John [probably will
do 1st John] I’ll hit on some key themes as well.
The point being- these key
figures- these ‘Pillars’ they seem to be ‘out of touch’ with many of our modern
day teachings.
I wonder who’s right?
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
1827- SCHOOL LOANS AND HOW MANY
TIMES DID THAT ROOSTER CROW?
I want to try and do both
‘politics and religion’- lets start with politics.
This story is a couple of days
late [the big one this week is the anti Romney ad that the Obama campaign
released- saying he would not have killed Bin Laden].
This story is last week’s fight
over keeping the cost of federally funded student loans from doubling in July.
Basically in 2007 congress passed
a law to keep the interest rates low- and it expires in a few months.
Now- both sides of the aisle
actually agree on this- they just disagree on how to pay for it [around 6
billion in cost].
The Dems in the senate want to
‘tax the rich’ yes- they are not afraid to keep going to this pool- even though
eventually this pool will run dry [not saying all the rich will become poor-
but ultimately you drive the wealth from the country- people put their money
where it won’t cost so much to keep!]
The Dems in the house want to tax
the oil companies.
The Repubs want to pay for it by
taking some money out of Obama care.
Okay- as the battle lines were
drawn- the Repubs control the house- so they passed it- with about a dozen Dems
on board- with the money coming from Obama care.
The President threatened to veto
it- and the Dems began accusing the Repubs of waging ‘a war on women’s health’.
Boehner [speaker of the house]
actually got mad and said the Dems are waging a phony fight.
Who’s right?
Okay- as an independent- there
are some points on both sides- but the ‘war on women’ is a stretch.
Why?
The fund in the health care law
that the Repubs want to use- is a fund for preventative care- less than 1 % of
this fund is targeted for women’s health.
The President and the Dems were
the first ones to tap into this fund- as sort of a slush fund- when they needed
the money for- of all things- a tax cut!
Yes- in the recent fight over
extending the payroll tax cut [Social Security] the Dems came up with the idea
to tap into this same preventive fund- and they used the money [billions] to
give people a tax cut.
Now- when they did it- it was not
a ‘war on women’ it was a ‘good thing’.
When the Repubs did it- it was a
war on women’s health.
So- this is gridlock- this is why
our country is becoming more and more dysfunctional as the days go by.
I have said this over the past
few years- if we don’t actually elect people who will deal with the real
issues- the big one being the cost of Medicare- which at the current rate will
consume around 50 % of all federal spending in a few years- if we don’t elect
people who will do this- then all the other little ‘campaign’ talking points
will mean nothing.
Okay- this past week I went thru
a course by Professor Bart Ehrman.
He teaches at the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
He teaches Christianity and the
New Testament and has been popular the last couple of years because he had a
N.Y. times best seller- Misquoting Jesus.
Whenever I study a course- I
usually do a parallel teaching on the blog.
Not word for word- I usually have
a background in the subject already- and if the course goes too ‘off course’ I
dump it and just finish the blog study by memory.
This time I never planned on
covering the course from the get go- because I knew Ehrman was what you would
call a Liberal scholar.
Now- Liberal and Conservative- in
the field of Theology- are not political matters.
Liberals are those who hold to
the critical view of the bible that was developed in the 19th
century- primarily out of the German universities- men like Rudolph Bultman
were leaders in the field.
This ‘way’ of interpreting the
bible- called Higher Criticism- had some good points to it- but at the end of
the day they came to reject the historical accuracy of scripture- and said that
the Gospels were written by unknown men who wanted to simply convey spiritual
truths that Jesus taught.
Conservative teachers [like me]
hold to the belief that the bible is indeed historically accurate- and the
‘Inspired Word of God’.
Okay- as I went thru the course-
I honestly expected Bart to make a better case for his side.
I really learned nothing knew- I
was already familiar with the critic’s points- and he made the same ones that
the conservative side has already refuted.
Now- let me give you a few
examples.
When I first started reading thru
the bible as a new believer- I did find some of these ‘discrepancies’ myself.
I noticed that in Matthews’s
gospel the story about the denial of Jesus says Peter will deny Jesus 3 times
before the ‘rooster crows’.
In Marks gospel it says ‘before
the rooster crows twice’.
When I first saw this- it really
wasn’t that big of a deal to me- and one time I mentioned it to my Pastor- a
good Baptist man who was trained in a Fundamentalist school- and to my surprise
he was not aware of this.
I also noticed a few more things
like this over the years- and my pastor simply was never trained in these
areas.
Now- I mention this only to point
out that if you get a well rounded education- it really should include some of
these so called discrepancies.
Some of the Higher Criticism is
helpful- some not.
But to avoid these textual
problems- simply because you’re a Fundamentalist- does more harm than good-
especially when your parishioners are learning the stuff on their own!
Okay- I ‘solved’ the problem of
the denials by simply seeing that even though one gospel says ‘before the
rooster crows’ and the other ‘twice’- that at the end of the day one writer is
simply giving you more detail.
It really is not a contradiction-
if Matthew said ‘before the roster crows once’ then yes- that would be a
problem.
But he simply gave less detail
than the other writer.
Okay- after becoming familiar
with Ehrman- and knowing that he is famous in the field of liberal scholarship-
I thought for sure he would come up with something better than this.
But in actuality- this was one of
his main examples of why the bible is not historically accurate.
I couldn’t believe it.
Now- to be fair- there are other
things like this that do happen- but they are all minor details of the story
[John’s gospel seems to indicate that Jesus was crucified on a different feast
day than the other writers say].
But all these minor details in no
way justify rejecting the gospels as historically accurate.
Let me just hit on a few things
that the higher critics have right.
They do point to the fact that
the early followers of Jesus lived in an Oral culture- things were passed along
by word of mouth for the most part.
The writing of books [scrolls]
did take place- but it was not an easy- or cheap trade.
We live in a day of books and
internet access and all sorts of ways for the printed word to be distributed-
but in the early church it was not like this.
So- the gospels were probably
written about 20-50 years after the death and resurrection of Christ.
What?
Yes- this is true.
The more conservative scholars go
with the earlier date [some go as early as 15 years after Christ] but no one
claims that the gospels were written at the same time as Christ walking the
earth.
Yes- the stories were transmitted
orally [oral culture] but they were written later on.
Now- the ultra liberal scholars
say ‘see- how could they have known all the facts if they were written so much
later’- and Ehrman uses the example of the game ‘telephone’ [or something like
that?].
Where you have one person in
class tell something to the next in line- and at the end of the line you get a
different account.
Ehrman says ‘see- we have no idea
what/who Jesus really was’.
Okay- the main discrepancy that
Bart used- was the rooster crowing.
He actually sounded mad on the
C.D. [I listen while I work!] and he said ‘well- which is it [damn it!!] did
the rooster crow once- or twice!’
And then he jumped to the
conclusion that the gospels were really fake stories that were made up by
unknown men- well meaning men- but they had no real historical truth to them.
This my friends is what I call a
‘leap of faith’.
Geez- if we did this was all
other biographies- we would have no ‘factual’ histories about anyone.
I’ll end with a note to my
Catholic readers.
A couple of years ago I read the
Popes book- Jesus of Nazareth- I did a brief review on the blog and I really
liked the book a lot.
One of the things the Pope deals
with [remember- Benedict was a priest from Germany- where the whole school of
higher criticism arose] in the book is this whole debate over the historical
accuracy of the bible.
At one point- as he graciously- yet
boldly defends the conservative view- he is talking about the liberal view that
the gospels were written by these unknown men who basically made the stories
up.
The Pope asks ‘and just how did
these men manage to write the most popular books of all time- books that came
to be revered and known and loved by generations and generations- and yet no
one even knows the names of the authors?’ [I did ad lib a little here]
The bottom line is- if the
gospels were written by a bunch of anonymous men who simply wanted to convey
some spiritual truths about Jesus- and they managed to stay hidden for all
these centuries- this theory has more holes in it than say- a rooster crowing
once or twice.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1826- JAMES
This past week I have been
reading the letter of James found in the New Testament.
James has always been a favorite-
it was written [more than likely] by the brother of Jesus and it is the same
James we read about in Acts chapter 15- one of the 3 main church leaders at the
Jerusalem church.
Note- to my Catholic friends-
when I say ‘brother’ Protestants believe that Mary had other children after
giving birth to Jesus.
We both believe in the Virgin
birth- conceived by the Holy Spirit- but Protestants believe Mary had other
children by Joseph.
Okay- not a big deal in my mind.
To defend the Catholic position
somewhat- even though James is called the brother of the Lord in scripture-
brother can refer to close cousins and also ‘Christian’ brothers- so that’s how
our Catholic friends interpret it.
Okay- Just this morning I read
the last chapter- and thru the week I tried to meditate on one chapter each
day.
Key themes- defend the poor,
praise the humble- and rebuke [warn] the rich.
Beware of the tongue- what you
say ‘it is a world of sin’ and can start a great fire- just like a match starts
a forest fire.
Works- was not ‘Abraham our
father JUSTIFIED BY WORKS’ ‘Rahab the harlot was JUSTIFED BY WORKS’.
To my scholarly friends- I
believe a right understanding of these verses can bridge a 500 year old split between
Protestants and Catholics.
I have tried my best to explain
this in the past- and it takes time.
Suffice it to say that the normal
Protestant interpretation does not do justice to the text.
Most Protestants try their best
to say that James WAS ONLY saying ‘the faith that saves is working faith’.
While this is true- if you simply
re-read the portions I quoted above- you can see there is more to it than this.
In a nutshell- Justification,
Salvation, Righteousness [all words that speak about ‘being saved’] are not
only static terms [one time events] but also fluent.
James uses the example from
Genesis 22- when Abraham offered his son Isaac on the altar.
The apostle Paul uses Genesis 15-
when Abraham ‘believed God and it was accounted unto him for righteousness’.
I believe if we see that James is
speaking about the ongoing relationship that God has with his kids- and when
these kids do right- obey God- it pleases God.
And God can continue to say ‘well
done son- did well’ and in the mind of James- you can say ‘Abraham was
justified by works’ God said ‘good job- you’re just’.
There is more to it than this-
but I think this explanation is more in keeping with the text than simply
seeing James thru the lens of Paul- James does not contradict Paul- but is
simply coming at it from a different angle.
Okay- James deals with the
'rights of the worker’ yes- this is a biblical issue- workers rights!
That’s why historically the
church has sided with labor movements.
Many of my conservative brothers
seem to equate all union movements with ‘the left’ but to be honest to the
text- James [and in this case- Jesus] can be called liberal!
James is chock full of good
stuff- try and read it this week if you haven’t all ready.
One of the key themes that I
always see ‘jump out’ at me is the theme of defending and honoring the poor-
and rebuking the rich.
Now- to my friends who are ‘rich’
its okay- the warnings are along the lines of what the apostle Paul told
Timothy [1st Timothy 6] to simply keep wealth in its proper context.
Honor God with it [by helping the
poor- not by making TV preachers rich!] and be humble.
This theme is important for our
day- because there are many well meaning Christians- and movements- who have
gone off track with the wealth issue and have made it a goal of faith.
James- Paul- and Jesus all had
strong warnings for the rich- and had great praise for the poor [they inherit
the kingdom- James and Jesus said it].
For more on this subject-
referred to as the Prosperity gospel- I will post a few posts from the blog
right below.
These are from the February posts
of each year.
During the year when I write
individual posts- I put them in categories and stick them in the February posts
at the start of the New Year.
So these are from the Prosperity
gospel section.
Also- if you go to the blog [or
are on it now] look to the left and you will find my first little book- called
House of Prayer or Den of Thieves- I talk about this issue there as well.
Okay- that’s it for now- might do
another politics post in a few days- not sure what’s next.
Don’t forget to try and lift each
other up in prayer- help someone who’s down on their luck- share with the less
fortunate in some way this week- give- but give for the purpose of helping the
poor- don’t always see it as ‘an investment with a return’ but give out of
love- God will reward you for it.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1825- PHILOSOPHY [conclusion]
Today let’s wrap up the last
philosophy post for now.
Over the last 6 months or so I
have posted around 25 posts- covering the pre Socratic thinkers [800 B.C.] and
we made it all the way up to the 19th century.
The main philosophical thought of
the 20th century was called Logical Positivism.
This idea said there were 3
stages to Western thought/culture;
First- Infancy [religious/myth]
Second- adolescence [philosophy]
Third- adult [science/empirical]
This idea said that man in the 20th
century has finally advanced beyond the silly stages of religion and has now
moved into a stage where the only true things are empirical in nature.
That is- for something to be
true- you must be able to show it scientifically [or mathematically].
It did not take too long before
the critics figured out the major flaw with this idea.
This philosophy states ‘the only
truth is empirical’ this statement in itself [as well as all the books written
on it] is not an empirically proven statement.
Therefore- according to its own
criterion- it is false.
This particular aspect of the
philosophy was called The Verification Principle [had to be proven/verified
scientifically to be valid].
Pragmatism- this is the only home
grown philosophy that had its roots in the U.S.
Founded by Dewey and Peirce- this
thought denied objective reality and states that ‘whatever works- use it’.
Of course being ‘pragmatic’ in a
practical way is fine- we do want things to work.
But at its core Pragmatism says
there are no real ethics- no right or wrong- just things people do.
In the beginning of the 20th
century you had the British thinker/mathematician Bertrand Russell.
Russell was a good man- raised as
a Christian.
But as a young man he read a book
by John Stuart Mill [19th century] that questioned one of the
classic arguments for the existence of God [the argument from first cause].
Mill said ‘if everything has to
have a cause- then why not God- who caused him’.
Russell accepted Mills claim- and
became an influential atheist/agnostic.
The main flaw with this argument-
that everything ‘has a cause’ is that it’s false.
The law of Cause and Effect
[Causality] does not state that everything has a cause- it says that ‘every
effect has a cause’.
That is- there is nothing in
existence- an effect- that came from nothing.
Some argued that there was no
initial cause- but an infinite series of ‘little’ cause and effects that go on
forever.
This too is wrong- it leads to
another problem called the Infinite Regress.
If there is no First cause- then logically you
can never arrive at ‘Now’
There had to have been a starting
point somewhere [Einstein has since proved this] and the starting point [Big
Bang] could not have come from nothing.
This too is a very common belief
among many well meaning people- that somehow science has taught us that all
things came from nothing.
This could not be further from
the truth- this is referred to as Creation Ex Nihilo- which too is
scientifically false.
The only other option- beside the
Infinite Regress- and the creation out of nothing- is there had to have been
some type of first cause- who is not limited to the material realm.
By nature this being would have
to be Metaphysical [outside the physical realm] and would have to be self
existent- having no beginning.
To have a First cause- who
himself is infinite- is indeed consistent with the principals of logic- and at
the end of the day is the only reasonable explanation for the existence of all
other things.
Okay- as we end our posts on
philosophy for now- why did I cover this?
Thru out the history of the
church Christians have grappled and challenged the other world views- and have
done a good job at it.
The Christian perspective is not
some silly religious way of life that has no real proof.
To the contrary- the church has
had the upper hand in all these debates down thru the centuries.
But in today’s ‘media market’
Christianity- the proliferation of self help books [everyday day a Friday?]
The nonstop talk about becoming
rich- or sending your money to ‘my ministry’ as a ‘seed faith’ to become rich.
In this environment- many
outsiders see the church as an irrelevant- never ending drum beat that they
can’t wait to switch to another channel.
This is not the history of the
church- and the church has historically won the debate on the reality of God.
It’s just the average person does
not know it.
So- for the Christian to be
learned in these fields- to have a working knowledge of the opposing world
views- is a good thing.
Why do so many believers avoid a
field like philosophy?
The apostle Paul warned the
Colossians ‘beware of the philosophies of men’.
He also wrote to his protégé
Timothy ‘beware of the oppositions of science- falsely so called’.
The word for science in this text
is Gnosis- the Greek work for knowledge.
In the early days of the church
there was a Christian cult that rose up- called Gnosticism.
More than likely- Paul was not
saying that all science- as we use the term today- is bad- but he was warning
against a particular from of science- called Gnosticism.
The same with the warning on
philosophy- while you could apply it to all philosophy- that is to say that we
should be careful when people try to give us opposing ways of thought- yet in
context it seems like the apostle is dealing with the philosophies that oppose
Christian thought.
For the first 1500 years of the Christian
church the study of Theology and Philosophy went hand and hand.
After the Protestant Reformation
[15th century] many Protestants avoided the field- which I think was
a mistake.
So- as we close up this subject
for now- maybe review a few of the posts on the blog that I did these last few
months- become more familiar with the apologetic arguments for the existence of
God.
Christians do not have to argue-
or oppose atheists- or other religions that hold a different view than we do.
But we should be able to give a
defense for the faith- to explain to society around us why we believe the
things we do.
At the end of the day- we really
do have the winning argument.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1822- CHOSEN BY GOD
Good morning to all my on line
friends.
Today let’s cover the book of
Ephesians and John 17.
I stumbled on them this past
week- not realizing the similarity of themes.
In the past I have taught
complete bible studies- both on radio and at the same time on the blog.
It took a little longer- because
I would write on a chapter- then take 2 or 3 radio programs [15 minute shows]
to cover it on air.
I’m not even sure- I think I
might have already done a full Ephesians study on the blog?
Ephesians is written by the
apostle Paul- though some scholars believe it was written by one of Paul’s
disciples- they think it might be more of an elaboration on Paul’s other
epistle to the Colossians.
There are various reasons that
some scholars do stuff like this- won’t go into all the reasons- in my mind
when a bible letter says within the text that Paul wrote it- then I go with
that.
The short letter [6 chapters]
starts off with a declaration that God chose the believers before he even made
the world.
That God had a predestined
purpose for them to have become children of God and for this new people of God
to reveal the ‘manifold wisdom of God’ to everyone one [thing] else.
One of the verses says that even
the angels and powers in heaven ‘learn’ the things of God thru the church.
This really is an amazing
statement- that God uses the church to reveal Divine truths to the whole
universe!
This theme of God choosing us
[them] before the world- to fulfill a purpose that he planned before the world-
is a major theme in the first 4 chapters of the book.
He wants them to see that this
calling- this place where they are at at the present time- it is a sort of
Divine appointment with destiny- that God had planned this before the creation
of the world.
And it is now ‘in time’ that they
are living out this Divine plan.
In John chapter 17 we read the
prayer of Jesus.
Jesus says that he has 'finished’
the work that God gave him to do- which was to reveal God to these disciples
that God has given to him.
He says ‘all mine are thine- and
thine are mine- and I am glorified in them’.
Jesus also hits on the theme of
this being a work of God that he pre-planned before the world was made.
He prays ‘don’t take them out of
the world- but keep them from the evil’.
The same theme that we see in the
‘Our Father’.
I find it interesting that one of
the more popular ‘end times’ teaching of our day is the Rapture.
Tim Lahaye has popularized this
idea in his very successful series of books about the end times.
In the 1980’s- the number one
best seller among Christian books [I think it was actually number 1 for all
categories?] was Hal Lindsey’s ‘late great planet earth’.
He too took the same line as
Lahaye and taught the idea that God was going to take all the Christians ‘from
the earth’ and that the world would wonder where they all went.
I have covered this in the past-
how the church came to teach this- how the historic church did not teach it-
and why I believe the Rapture- as a separate event from the 2nd
coming- has no real biblical basis.
The point for this post is part
of the prayer of Jesus is ‘I pray not that you would take them out of the
world’ which on its face seems to be the opposite of what the Rapture doctrine
teaches.
Okay- Jesus revealed the Father
to his men.
The apostle Paul told the church
‘God chose you for this before the world was made’.
Jesus believed that these
disciples [and by extension the church] were ‘given to him’ by the pre ordained
will of God.
What all this means- in a
nutshell- is that where you are at right now- all the things you are going
thru- God knew it before it ever happened.
And he still picked you for the
job!
The Apostle tells them to be
strong in the Lord- to pray always- and put on the whole armor of God.
Yes- just because they were
chosen- did not mean they could sit around all day doing nothing- they were
chosen for a purpose- and it was up to them [by grace] to walk in that purpose.
I would encourage you to try and
read these chapters this week- Ephesians is short- but has a lot of good stuff
in it.
As you read- look for the theme
of God choosing the church before the ‘world was made’.
Notice how often this idea ‘pops
up’ in the writing of Paul- and how it plays a major part in the life of the
church.
Read- and apply- the
instructional aspects of the letter [on family- husbands and wives- children-
workers and bosses].
And practice- as much as
possible- the ‘put on the armor of God’ teaching found in chapter 6- that
section ends with ‘pray for everyone’.
That- in my mind- is the most
important part of the instruction.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1820- WHERE THE GRAPES OF WRATH
ARE STORED
Let’s end the week with a look at
the death of Christ.
Today- Good Friday- is the day we
remember the Passion.
In Psalms 22 we see a Messianic
prophecy- the words king David spoke thru the Holy Spirit.
These are the words- feelings-
that Jesus had on the night before he was crucified- he went to the Garden of
Gethsemane [literally- The Olive Press] and was in extreme anguish.
In this Psalm we read ‘I am a
worm and no man’ ‘all that see me laugh at me- they think my cause is hopeless’
‘I cried and prayed and you never heard me- I have no rest day or night’.
Read the psalm later today- see
the pain he went through.
The garden of Gethsemane was an
Olive garden at the base of the ‘The Mount of Olives’.
It was a place where olives were
crushed- the process allowed the oil to come forth- which was a picture of what
Jesus was going thru- he was ‘being crushed’ so the oil [Spirit] would come
forth to the world [Acts 2].
In the prayer he says ‘Father- if
it’s possible- remove this cup- never the less- not my will but yours be done’.
Many of us are familiar with this
phrase ‘thy will be done’ but we miss the cup part.
What was the cup?
The cup stood for ‘the cup of the
wrath of God’ it was a symbol of the judgment of God coming upon the sins of
the world.
When Jesus said ‘take away the
cup’ he wasn’t afraid of dying- but he ‘feared’ the separation that was going
to take place from God.
As he ‘drank the cup’ [the sins
of the world] he would become ‘the container’ of the wrath of God- he would be
cursed from God as a ‘sinful’ thing.
The apostle Paul says ‘he-
[Jesus] became sin for us- who knew no sin- that we might become the
righteousness of God in him’ [Corinthians].
So Jesus struggled with the cup.
In the book of Revelation chapter
14 we see an image of the cup and wrath.
There are angels coming out from
the throne- we see Jesus sitting on a cloud and angels all around.
The angel says ‘thrust in your
sickle and reap- for the harvest of the earth is ripe’ and we see the
‘Winepress of wrath’.
The picture is this angel reaping
the earth- gathering the ‘grapes of the earth' [Steinbeck- the Grapes of wrath]
and casting them into a winepress [another type of pressing- like the olive
imagery].
The Winepress is ‘outside the
city’ [very significant image] and the blood from the press goes out for 184
miles.
This is a scene of judgment and
wrath.
During the civil war the north
used this verse as their theme song- The Battle Hymn of the Republic ‘mine eyes
have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord he is Trampling out the Vintage
where the grapes of wrath are stored’.
Yes- the winepress was an image
of where the grapes of wrath waited for the pressing- when the blood would come
forth.
Now- this next part really deserves
a full study- but let me do a brief overview.
The writer of Hebrews [probably
Paul] speaks about an altar that sits ‘outside the city’ where the animal’s
bodies were burned.
In Old Testament Jewish law- some
of the animals bodies were not fully burned at the time of the offering- the
blood that was used for the Day of Atonement was not a complete burnt offering-
the animal blood was used.
So- the Jewish people had a spot-
outside the gate of the court [outside the city] where the bodies were burned.
Now- the writer of Hebrews says
this is a type- a picture- of the final sacrifice of Christ that took place
‘outside of the law’.
That is Jesus established a New
Covenant in his own Blood- not part of the Old animal sacrificial system.
Okay- his death took place
‘outside the gate’- that’s important to see.
Now- as Jesus struggled with his
impending death- he came to a point where he sweat drops of blood- he then said
‘if this cup cannot pass unless I drink it- then so be it’.
He drinks the cup ‘of the wrath
of God’ and in a sense he becomes the place ‘where the grapes of wrath are
stored’.
He himself becomes the final sin
sacrifice for humanity- the place of pressing- where the ‘wine/blood comes
out’.
As we finish this Holy Week-
getting ready for the resurrection celebration this Sunday- let’s not forget
that Jesus drank the cup- he became sin for us who knew no sin.
Yes- as the North sang ‘mine eyes
have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord he is trampling out the vintage
where the grapes of wrath are stored’.
They weren’t seeing that the
place where the grapes of wrath were stored were inside the Son of God- he
drank the cup ‘to the dregs’ and was ‘trampled on’ by God’s wrath.
Yes- Jesus said ‘I am a worm and
no man’ he was in anguish for you- and me.
Amen- and amen.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1818- WHO IS BARRY?
Last night I was channel surfing
the news shows- and I caught Lawrence O’Donnell doing another one of his ‘anti
Mormon’ critiques.
Yes- MSNBC has an ongoing
narrative where they speak about Romney as a ‘strange- weird- cult member’.
I saw this months ago- and they
have been faithful to their task.
So anyway O’Donnell is covering
the ancient teaching of Brigham Young [the co-founder of the Mormon religion- a
follower of Joseph Smith] and he’s quoting all the racist teachings that he
held to.
Specifically that mixed marriages
are wrong.
Now- I could quote the actual
Christian bible- yes- the Protestant/Catholic bible- and find this teaching in
there.
Yes- the bible O’Donnell believes
in!
But that would solve nothing.
Many old time preachers did teach
this doctrine- from many various denominations.
Do we [I] believe that mixed
marriage is wrong?
No.
But you do have some
fundamentalist groups who still teach this.
So O’Donnell is fulfilling his
task to portray Romney as a cult guy- and he spends a big portion of the show
telling everyone that Romney’s religion is racist.
Now- you could find stuff like
this out- with all the other candidates- even the President- yet this network
is really not a news network- they are simply Obama devotees.
Axelrod- the presidents campaign
guy- a few weeks back tweeted that Romney’s religion does not allow women to
enter the temple when they are menstruating.
He left the tweet up for a little
while then pulled it.
What?
I have heard other Mormons say
this is a false charge- I really don’t know if the church ever taught it- but
it’s possible.
Why?
Again- you do have certain health
standards in the Old Testament- that if you read them- they speak about ‘uncleanness’
when a woman is menstruating.
We find verses on Dwarves not
being able to serve God.
People [men] whose ‘stones’ are
crushed not being able to serve God [testicals are stones].
So if you wanted- you could trace
all these things- not just to Brigham Young or Joseph Smith- but you could also
tie them in to the Christian faith.
Now- do most sane Christians
believe these ‘strange’ teachings are still in effect?
Thank God- no.
But if your goal is to simply
slander the opponent- then have at it.
One example.
Over the last few years- as a
news watcher/reader- you pick up on certain clues along the way.
Maybe a story won’t make it into
the mainstream [for various reasons- to cover up for a person- etc.] But as you
read the other columnists- you see little pieces of the puzzle.
So- one of the charges that the
‘right’ has made against Obama is that he had a different name when he grew up-
and went to school.
Some say he held the name ‘Barry
Sotero’.
They claim his identity is in
question because he might have been legally adopted by his stepdad- thus
throwing the whole citizenship issue back into play.
Now- I have never read/heard a
‘mainstream news’ report on this- so I never brought it up [to me- it’s just as
bad as raising the history of Romney’s church up- a belief he- and most Mormons
do not hold to].
But as an avid reader of all
stripes [both Liberal and Conservative writers].
I noticed something about a year
ago- Maureen Dowd- a liberal columnist who writes for the N.Y. Times- she started
referring to the president as Barry.
She gives no reason for it- she
does not try and defend her use of it- she simply knows that he did indeed use
this name- from what I can tell- all the way right up into his years in
college.
Then why would you have never
heard about this until now?
Because the media have a
narrative- a story they want to tell [and also believe in].
They tell one that has the
opponents of the president as a bunch of weird cult members- people who reject
mixed marriages- people whose women can’t attend church when they are on their
period- who have houses that have elevators for their cars [Romney].
These same media people were so
entranced by a particular image of a man- an unrealistic messianic image- that
they were so taken captive by- that one of them quit their job as a reporter-
right on the spot- to simply join the most ‘transformative presidency’ in the
history of man [Linda Douglas- who was reporting on the 2008 election].
You had another reporter [George
Stephanopoulos] who admitted on national TV that he cried- very loudly [I guess
like when you can’t get a word in type thing?] when he watched the inauguration
of the president.
Chris Matthews famously said a
thrill goes up his leg when he simply hears words proceeding from the
presidents mouth.
Now- I don’t hate the man.
I don’t even like Romney.
But as you attempt to navigate
between what’s best- what’s true- what’s fake.
For us to get treated to the 200
year old teaching of some strange leader of a religious sect- and yet for us to
not even know that the current president never even came to the mainland of the
U.S. until college- is striking.
Yes- the president lived in
Indonesia- spent time in Kenya- visited the African continent- wrote about the
anti Imperial mindset of the African colonies.
He was influenced by stories and
people whose view of America was negative.
He lived among them- went to
school with them.
Wore their Muslim garb [yes].
Prayed the Muslim prayer.
Used the name Barry.
And never stepped on the lower 48
until college.
Now- does this mean he’s a bad
man?
No.
But for us to know that
menstruating Mormons cant attend temple- and to not know any of this- well
that’s what you call media bias.
That’s not journalism.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1815- HEAD TRANSPLANT
I have been reading the San
Antonio paper the last few weeks- and they have been running some ad for dental
implants [fake teeth].
They have the ‘before/after’
pictures- whenever I see the ad- I think ‘before what? A complete head
transplant’!
Yes- the before shots remind me
much of my homeless buddies- the after shots look like glamour pictures for the
‘most beautiful person in the world’ contest.
This last week I have reached a
sort of milestone- a few years ago I began praying [more than usual] for all
types of criminal cases that I read about- or see- on the news.
I actually painted their names
all over my gazebo- the back fence- and yes- right on the back and sides of the
house [along with lots of bible verses].
I have hundreds of pictures/articles
cut from the paper- their pinned to my office walls.
You say ‘John- I know you mean
well- but do you think this is normal’.
Actually no- neither does my
wife.
I have been threatened ‘if you
keep doing this- I will paint the whole house’.
My paints [and brushes] have been
hidden [by others!]- and when Christmas comes around- I tell the kids ‘hey-
just get me another 5 gallon bucket of paint- I’m running low’ [yes- this part
is a joke].
Some of the more severe cases-
the ones that stick in my mind- I paint their names- the others I just pin up
the article.
Sometimes I see the cases more
than once- at the time of the crime- and then when they get sentenced.
This week Jacob Gonzales was
sentenced to life without parole.
He plead guilty to a triple
homicide he committed last year- shot 3 girls in cold blood.
The worst homicide the city has
ever seen.
So I had written the name of
Jacob down- and saved the article.
As I looked for a spot to paint
the name- I realized that I already wrote the name Jacob- in big letters- on a
ladder on my gazebo [long story- bible verse about Jacobs Ladder].
So it kinda just fit.
I knew his case was significant-
I do ‘forever’ pray for these guys [and women] and being it was a local case-
and he will be in jail for life- he would benefit more from the prayers.
During my normal reading for the
week- I was reading Jeremiah chapter 31.
I usually focus on one or 2
chapters a week- and if I remember I comment on them at the end of the week.
As I read chapter 31- it starts
with a verse that should be added to the previous chapter.
Sometimes you run into a chapter
like that- our bible chapters and verses are really ‘man made’ that is the
chapters themselves are not inspired- just the content [chapter divisions].
So I thought ‘heck- let me go
ahead and see if the Lord has something for me in chapter 30’.
Now- this is the week where I
added Jacob to my prayer group- again.
And I felt there was some special
significance to his case.
In Jeremiah chapter 30 the Lord
says ‘this is the time of Jacobs’s trouble- and I will save him out of it’.
It would take too long to teach
the actual doctrine of Jacobs Trouble- but it is a long- and sometimes
controversial teaching that we find all through the bible.
I say controversial because many
[most?] Protestants have an ‘end time’ teaching about this [called
Dispensationalism] that I don’t agree with.
I hold more to the historic
churches’ view on these passages [Catholic, Orthodox, etc.]
But Jacob- in the bible- is the
son of Isaac- the son of Abraham.
God changes his name to Israel
[he is the father of the 12 tribes of Israel].
And the name obviously holds a
lot of significance in the bible.
The ‘trouble’ part refers to the
passages we find in the bible that speak about a very troubling time for Israel
as a nation- in many of the End Time books/movies- it’s called ‘The Great
Tribulation’.
But the significance for me- this
week- was God kinda spoke to me thru the connection of this kid Jacob- who I
prayed for all week.
Yes- Jacobs’ time of trouble.
In chapter 31 [Jeremiah] God
tells Israel ‘there is coming a time when I will make a new covenant with you-
not like the one I made with you during the time of Moses’.
This fits in with what I taught
last week- how the apostle Paul said we are not under the old law [Moses and
the 10 commandments] but under a new covenant- the new and everlasting covenant
of the Blood of Jesus.
In the chapter it says God will
write his law on our minds and hearts- it won’t just be an outward law- written
on tables of stone- but one written on the inside.
Yes- he says ‘all things will be
new- I will never remember your sins any more’.
You know- I guess complete head
[heart] transplants can happen- but it takes a miracle from God.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1812- John 3- Ephesians 2 [and
the chicken!]
I want to cover the 2 bible
chapters that I mentioned the other day- John chapter 3 and Ephesians chapter
2.
But first- some business.
I wrote a post the other day
about ‘confiscating’ the little plastic bags at my local grocery store [HEB].
And some of you might be thinking
‘see- crime does pay’.
For your information- the bags
were probably worth about 25 cents.
The other day I went to take out
the chicken thighs for dinner- I couldn’t find them!
Then I thought ‘gee- my truck has
been smelling like dead bodies lately’.
Yes- the chicken was left under
the back seat for 2 days- cost- about 6 dollars.
Lesson? Don’t steal the bags
anymore- cost? Priceless.
Okay- John chapter 3 is the
famous chapter where Jesus tells Nicodemus ‘a man cannot see the kingdom of God
unless he is born again’ [or born from above].
We also have the famous John 3:16
verse ‘for God so loved the world…’
If you read the chapter- both
Jesus- and John the Baptist speak about those who believe- they are not
condemned- and those who do not believe are judged.
Yet Jesus says he came into the
world- not to condemn it- but to save it.
In Ephesians chapter 2 the
apostle Paul says we are ‘saved by grace- not of works- lest any man should
boast’.
Both chapters emphasize the role
faith plays in salvation.
Okay- where did I come up with
these chapters for the reading of the week?
They were both quoted from during
the mass on Sunday [as a Protestant- I always try and watch the mass on Sunday-
as well as doing our own home church meeting].
‘John- do Catholics believe in
being born again’?
Yes- very much so.
Being born again is actually a
vital doctrine within Catholicism.
For a brief review of
Catholic/Protestant teaching- on my blog- on the front page to the left- you
will see a bunch of studies that I have highlighted- click the ‘Protestant
Reformation- Luther’ and you will get a more in depth discussion on some of the
differences- and points of agreement.
But for this brief post-
Catholics [and Orthodox] believe the new birth takes place at baptism- for the
most part Protestants/Evangelicals believe it takes place at the point of faith
[added to a long list of ‘altar calls’ or ‘5 steps of conversion’ etc.- in
short- Protestants have their own sacramental system- they just don’t know it!]
I say- mostly- because there are
many various groups within the Protestant movement that also would agree that
water baptism is the point of being saved [church of Christ- various
Pentecostal groups- etc.].
Now- I hold more to the historic
Reformation view [faith] but I do not see a ‘grave’ departure from scripture
with those who put more of the emphasis on baptism.
There are verses in John 3- Jesus
says ‘a man must be born of water and the spirit’.
Plus- the last half of the
chapter starts with a discussion over ‘purifying’.
There was a debate- going on at
the time- between Jesus and John’s followers- about baptism- the chapter says
the debate was about ‘purifying’.
Overall- it’s not unreasonable-
in my mind- to hold to the more traditional emphasis on the importance of the
role of baptism.
Yet- Christians fight-
vehemently- over this.
In this part of the country it’s
common for a Baptist- Assembly of God- or Church of Christ believer to view the
‘other team’ as a cult over this- this to me is very sad.
The main point?
Regardless of how much of a role
water baptism plays in your particular denomination- the main point is we are
saved by faith- thru the death and resurrection of Christ.
In the Ephesians chapter- Paul
actually hits on some pretty deep themes- that the death of Christ removed the
‘wall of separation’ between Jew and Gentile- and we both are made into ‘one
new man’.
This shows us the role that the
Cross should play in society- it should bring various groups and cultures
together- not divide them.
It would take a little too much
time for me to go into what the ‘wall of separation’ was in Paul’s day.
But he wasn’t speaking about our
sins separating us from God [though this of course is true].
But he was speaking about the
role the law [10 commandments] played at the time.
Paul- a zealous teacher of the
Jewish law [Pharisee] held the law in high esteem- and often it became a
barrier between the Jew and Gentile.
Some of the more fame seeking
Pharisees [the ones we see Jesus interacting with in the gospels] used the fact
that they were the nation that received the law under Moses- as an ‘I’m better
than you’ mentality.
Paul says ‘the law of
commandments that was against us- Jesus nailed them to his Cross’ [Colossians].
He also says in his letter to the
Galatians ‘if righteousness comes by the law- then Christ died in vain’ strong
words indeed!
The point he is making is we-
believers- are no longer under the condemnation of the law- no longer under the
continual threat of God striking us down at any moment because of our sin.
We have been saved by grace and
those who ‘walk in the Spirit’ are no longer under condemnation [Romans 8].
So- Jesus nailed the law to the
Cross- and the barrier that separated Jew from gentile- as well as sinful man
from a Holy God- has been ‘taken away’ by Christ.
I must note that the apostle Paul
himself- who is famous for this teaching- always added the caveat ‘do we now
sin because we are not under the law? God forbid!’
He was accused- by the strict
sect of the Pharisees [known as Judaizers] of teaching a ‘lawless gospel’.
No- he- as well as most Christian
denominations today- teach that the 10 commandments are still very important-
and as believers in Christ we will naturally- by our new birth- fulfill the
law.
But it is no longer this sword of
Damocles hanging over our head.
Okay- for those who haven’t had
time to read the chapters yet- try and read them over the weekend- they are
short chapters- think about what I said in this post- look for the emphasis on
faith- the role that faith plays in our salvation.
I’ll be back in a few days- but I
need to go now- need to get another pack of chicken thighs before the store
gets crowded.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1800- THE CHURCH LADY
I caught the debate last night
[number 20!] and was surprised that King only asked one question on ‘social
issues’ [I think?].
He did bring up the ‘controversy’
over birth control.
Now- up until a few weeks back-
starting with the question by Stephanopoulos [a Dem insider- worked for
Clinton- admitted- on air- that he cried while sitting at home during the Obama
win. You say ‘so what John- Boehner
cries too!’ Yeah- but he’s smart enough not to admit it when he weeps in private].
Yeah- when Stephanopoulos brought
up the silly question on whether states had the right to ban birth control-
right after that the media jumped on the band wagon and have been saying how
the Repubs want a war on women’s right to health.
The media keep parading women
across the screen- decrying the attack on their health- after all- birth
control cures cancer! [The truth be told- there are many more health risks to
abortion and birth control then there are health benefits].
Yes- they want the country to see
the Repubs as right wing ‘satan hatin’ preachers!
I just read an article the other
day- 2 ‘women’s health clinics’ were fined in Texas- their disposal company was
dumping the bodies of aborted babies in the city dump.
A woman’s right? I wonder how
many of these little bodies belonged to future women.
So the debate goes on- and the
populace drinks it in.
They have been showing the clips
of a speech by Santorum- he talked about evil as a reality and satan as an
enemy.
Okay- he was speaking at a
Catholic university forum- it was about 4 years ago- what’s the big deal?
‘Well- you never know- say if he
starts talking like this in office’
You mean like Obama?
Yes- 2 weeks ago the Pres was
speaking- at a political/religious forum- in Washington- and he defended his
tax policies by saying they are based on Jesus’ teachings in the gospel of
Luke.
He quoted Jesus ‘to whom much is
given- much is required’.
Okay- I see the point he’s trying
to make- asking the rich to pay more.
But for a sitting U.S. president
to say that his tax policy- as opposed to the other side- is the ‘Jesus one’
well- that would have been world news for days if it were Bush.
So the satan speech- given at a
catholic school- geez- give it a break.
The media would have you think
that Santorum is the church lady from SNL [Saturday night live].
Dana Carvey did the Church Lady-
he would often come up with some circumstance- and then reply ‘hmmm- could it
be satan’.
Yeah- that’s Santorum!
This week I have been reading
Ezekiel chapter 34.
It talks about the leaders-
shepherds of the people. They are being rebuked because they are like
‘shepherds who feed themselves- they kill the sheep- eat the meat and wear the
wool as clothes’.
In the New Testament Jesus
alludes to this when he says ‘beware of false prophets- they are like wolves in
sheep’s clothing’.
Yes- that’s where the term comes
from.
The term means more than meets
the eye.
It’s speaking about a mindset-
one that sees people- church people- citizens- any group of people being
‘ruled’ by others.
And the mindset is ‘I can benefit
in some way from my position over them’.
This usually means financially.
I have written much about this
over the years- and I’m convinced that many good men in modern ministry do not
see the violation of scripture they engage in when they enter ‘ministry’ and
constantly appeal for money- even to the point of thinking that their becoming
rich off of the giving of people is ‘Gods way’.
But also in the broader sense-
God is rebuking the leaders because they really don’t have the true concerns of
the people at the fore front.
Good leaders- politicians-
presidents- congressman. They should be willing to make the right decisions-
even if those decisions seem less popular at the time- they should do it
because it’s right.
The Pres put out a policy
yesterday that said he wanted to lower corporate tax rates and eliminate tax
loopholes.
Now- I haven’t read the thing-
and I know some say it’s really a scam- I don’t know.
But if it has some truth in it- then
it would be a good thing.
Why?
Because most analysts say that’s
really a major step in the right direction.
Dems and Repubs- responsible
ones- have already said this needs to be done.
So if the thing is accurate- then
we should support the pres.
The other major thing that the
next pres must deal with is the entitlement programs- but whoever gets in-
whether it be Romney- Obama- or the Church Lady- they will need to govern for
the people- not pander to them for personal gain [popularity that will help
them win again].
Don’t get me wrong- as a
Christian I’m glad the Pres talked about Jesus- and that Santorum talked about
satan.
But the reality is- the ‘wolves
in sheep’s clothing’ looked/talked just like sheep- that’s how they kept
getting into the sheepfold- but all they really wanted was personal gain- they
saw the sheep [people] as a means to an end- and that’s what gets us in
trouble- every time.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
1793- ACCESS DENIED?
As we close the week lets try and wrap up one of
the major news stories.
This week the war raged over the Obama care
mandate for religious institutions to provide free birth control to their
employees.
Obviously the main objection to the rule came from
the Catholic Church.
Those on the left [by the way- not all] tried to
frame the debate around a woman’s right to have access to birth control.
The right said it was a freedom of religion- 1st
amendment argument.
Obama did an about face- to his surprise many of
his own team were mad about what he did- and he supposedly ‘solved’ the problem
by saying that the insurance companies must pay for it instead.
The Catholic Bishops conference in the U.S. -
headed up by Archbishop Timothy Dolan [from N.Y. - soon to become a Cardinal]
hesitated at first before they made a statement either accepting Obama’s
compromise or rejecting it.
As of right now- they reject it.
Why?
Many
Catholic institutions provide their own insurance- the so called compromise
still has Catholics paying/providing for something that they believe is contrary
to their faith.
I guess it would be good to cover why Catholics
are against contraception.
Most Protestants [including me] have no problem
with simple birth control practices.
We do have a problem with methods that basically
abort the child after he/she is conceived.
But overall we are okay with the idea.
Catholics historically appeal to the very real
mandate in scripture to ‘be fruitful and multiply’.
In Genesis chapters 1-2- you read how God created
plants and animals and man- and they all have the ‘seed within themselves’ that
is it is part of Gods purpose for things to reproduce.
Now- in the current debate those on the left have
made some simple- and obvious contradictions.
They have argued that to give the conscience
clause exception to the Catholics- that would be denying women ‘their right’ to
health care.
They say it is an issue of access- that if you
don’t do this women will not have proper access to the stuff.
Then at the same time they are saying ‘look- 99.9
% of all women use contraceptives’.
Okay- which one is it?
If just about every woman on the planet uses the
stuff- then how can you argue that unless Catholic institutions offer it- then
they are denying access?
Its seems pretty clear to me that most women that
need it can get it.
Number 2- some political experts have said that
the whole thing was planned- that the Democratic team was trying to change the
debate from ‘a woman’s right to choose’ [abortion] to ‘those darn right wingers
want to ban birth control’!
When I first heard this- I wasn’t too quick to
jump on the bandwagon.
Dick Morris was the first to bring it up on Fox
News.
But as the week progressed the idea grew legs.
It made it to the radio talk circuit and as of
today many do think the whole thing was planned.
Why do I think there might be some truth to this?
Remember about a month ago when George
Stephanopoulos hosted one of the debates.
He asked Romney a strange question- I mean even
the audience booed.
He asked if a state has the right to ban birth control.
To be honest- the question seemed to catch
everyone off guard.
Romney never fully answered it- but he did say
that there is no one that he knows of that wants to do this- that there are no
states pushing to ban birth control.
Then of course you had the present debate- which
some on the left did indeed try to frame by saying ‘they want to rob you of
your ‘right’ to birth control’.
Yea- I think Morris was right.
Now- if you can frame the argument- about
anything- by convincing people that it’s ‘their right’.
Then sooner or later people will try to ‘access’
the right.
Let me give you an example.
A few years ago I caught a movie about some
persons fight for Euthanasia [or as MSNBC says ‘youth in Asia’].
The show covered the struggle of some dying man
and his fight for the ‘right to die’.
It was a true case that he fought all the way to
the Supreme Court.
He finally won ‘hooray- no one can deny me this
right- yippee!’
Then as the show concluded they admitted that as
the year went by- the person kept getting worse- and you can imagine all his
friends and fellow strugglers who fought with him to ‘win the right’.
Well- they kind of felt like ‘gee- when is he
gonna pull the trigger’ after all- it’s his right.
The show ended by saying the disease progressed so
fast that he didn’t have time to kill himself.
What?
I mean he grew rose over a year- there was plenty
of time.
He realized that what happened in his case was he
was surrounded by people- many good people- people who I’m sure meant well.
But his entire fight was something that he really
did not want- something that in the end was no right at all- he got caught up
in the political fight and when he won- like the dog who chased the car but
didn’t know what to do with it when he caught it- yes this victim was not only
a victim of his disease- but a victim of those who convinced him that this was
his right.
As of today- women in this country have access to
birth control.
It looks like the congress might actually pass a
law that restricts Obama’s health law- that says the religious exemption clause
must stand.
I’m glad that the issue rose up now- because it
does give some time for the president and congress to do something.
But the fact is- according to those who advocate
for no religious exemption- they themselves admit that 99.9% of all woman use
the stuff.
This does not seem like a ‘no access’ issue to me.
Note- Do me a favor, those who read/like the
posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read them on.
Thanks- John
1791- PICTURES OF ME WITH BLACK PEOPLE
Well it’s been a sad couple of days- yes- we lost the
beautiful angel Whitney Houston.
I never was really a fan of Whitney- I mean she had a great
voice and all- I just never bought any of her music.
As I watched the media cover her death- I began to realize
how interesting her journey was- even with all the failures.
She was from Newark N.J. - I never knew that [right around
the area I grew up].
She started her singing ‘career’ in a church choir.
As I saw all the clips the past few days- I saw her singing
some Christian songs [I didn’t know that either].
And the last clip of her being recorded- a few days before
her death- she sang a note from the famous kids bible song ‘Yes Jesus loves
me’.
I know many in the media- and ‘church world’ have a tendency
to judge people when they die- many seem to know ‘for sure’ who made it to heaven-
and who did not.
I have learned a long time ago- I’m not the judge on stuff
like that.
I saw Bill O'Reilly do his shtick. He tried to do the ‘real
guy’ stuff- you know- like when he had on Bernie Goldberg- a Jewish friend- who
was trying to outdo Bill on the ‘I am a friend of the Black man’.
Goldberg brought out a photo of him with a Black rapper- Ice
Cube.
As Bernie shows the photo- to say ‘look- I even hug Black
men’.
He refers to Cube as ‘Ice T’.
Bill- as a true brother- corrects Bernie and tells him ‘it’s
not T but Cube’.
Bernie gets mad- you can see the look on his face ‘how dare
you correct me’.
Then someone from off camera must have yelled ‘listen- Bills
right- its Cube- not T’.
And Bernie quickly back tracks.
I guess Bernie got the picture from his file ‘pictures of me
with Black people’.
So anyway- O'Rielly does the section on Whitney and he kind
of goes hard on her.
He talks about her choice to do drugs- and basically says
she was looking to die- she made the choice.
I realize what he was saying- but I found it to be the wrong
time to say it.
A few years ago I heard a radio preacher talking about the
funeral of a gang member that he preached at.
He said the mother and family and all the gang bangers were
there- and he ‘told it like it was’.
He went on and said how he preached ‘this kid is in hell
right now- screaming his brains out- he has no rest- he’s burning- forever!!’
He said how the mom ran out crying- his family was
distraught- I thought he was lucky that he didn’t get gunned down right in the
pulpit.
Yes- we need to have
grace in these situations.
So- after seeing all the clips of Whitney- I believe she
very well might be with God right now- and sure- I know she messed up lots- but
I am certainly not in the position to judge the angel.
Okay- Angels?
The other day I was reading Psalms 147.
I read how God counts the stars and gives them names.
It reminded me of the book of Revelation- where there is
this vision of Jesus [chapter 1].
John the disciple sees Jesus- he has hair like wool- these eyes of fire- and feet
like brass- burned in a furnace.
As Jesus is standing there- he is surrounded by 7 golden
lamp stands- and he has 7 stars in his hand.
The vision is revealed to John- the lamp stands are the
churches [of Asia Minor] and the stars are the ‘angels of the 7 churches’.
Now- as a theology buff- I know many bible folk say these
angels are Pastors- because the Greek word simply means messenger.
But as I have read this over the years- I have come to
believe these are actually angels.
What does the bible say about angels?
In the book of Hebrews we read that they are ‘ministering
spirits- sent forth to minister to those who are inheriting salvation’.
We often hear that angels in the bible look like men- they
are not things with wings!
Actually- this is another ‘fable’.
While it is true that many appearances of angels in the
bible do look like men- and Hebrews also says that we should entertain [show
hospitality] to strangers- because some have helped angels and they didn’t even
know it.
Yet- there are also angels ‘with wings’.
We call these creatures Cherubim and Seraphim.
In the book of Exodus we read the story of the 10
commandments [chapter 20].
We read the first commandment as not having other gods before
God- and not to make graven images of anything.
Over the centuries the church has had some debates over
Christian art- is it right or wrong?
After all- much of it is statues and pictures depicting
people and creatures and angels and God.
So during the Protestant Reformation [and the rise of Islam]
you had occasions where people went out and destroyed the statues and paintings
of other groups.
A few things should be noted here.
The commandment- however you take it- does not say ‘go and
smash the statues of other religions’ [a few years ago the famous statues of
Buddha were destroyed- I think in India- but radical Muslims did this because
they felt the statues violated the commandment on angels]
Also- after Moses gets the 10 commandments from God- he puts
them inside a box called ‘The Ark of the Covenant’.
This box has a lid on it [called the Mercy Seat] and on the
lid you had 2 statues of Angels [Cherubim].
So- the actual box that held the commandment not to make
idols- had religious art on it!
So we need to be careful before we start going around
smashing statues [by the way- this smashing of the statues was called
Iconoclastic].
So- we see that angels are spirits- created by God- and they
are here to help us.
In Revelation 1 we read about a war in heaven- Michael and
his angels fighting against the dragon and his angels.
We read that Michael prevails and the devil loses.
It says ‘the accuser of the brothers is cast down- the
devil- who accused them before God day and night’.
There are only 2 named angels in the bible [3- if you
include the Catholic apocrypha].
They are Michael- Gabriel- and Raphael.
Yes- angels are real- they war on our behalf- and they fight
in a specific way- they cast down the dragon [satan] who accuses the believers.
This day I am happy in a way for Whitney- she struggled a
long time- she was such a beautiful ‘angel’.
I would like to think
she is with God right now- getting ready for ‘church’ this Sunday- yes- I know
she is not ‘an angel’ in the biblical way.
But let’s stretch some- yes- she will be singing in the
angelic choir once again.
Let’s not accuse her this day.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John
James would go on to be one of the leaders/Pastors of the
church at Jerusalem- we read about him in Acts chapter 15. Most scholars believe
this was the same James who penned the short letter we find in the N.T. that
bears his name.
One thing James hits on a lot in his letter- is he defends
the poor- the downtrodden- and he rips into the rich- the elite of the day. He
warns us not to be biased- not to use ‘uneven scales’ when dealing with people.
James hit on social justice issues- he picked them up from
his brother.
We need to be concerned about the world- if a raped woman is
forced to marry her rapist- then we ought not say ‘she was pardoned’. When we
critique one person for past failures- then we must do that to all.
But at the end of the day- Jesus never took the earthly
crown- he did not see the solution to be a political one- he brought Simon and
Matthew together on the same team- and he showed them what it means to lay your
life down for others- to live without the praise of men- the earthly standard
of success- he chose another way- and he left that path for us.
[1762] HE BEING DEAD- YET SPEAKS [Hebrews chapter 11]
Okay- lets try and cover a few things today. First- should I
now do the Mea Culpa? [last post]. Why did the DOW jump 500 points yesterday?
A few reasons- but the main one was that the ‘central banks’
kind of did a mini bail out of the European banks.
I use quotes for central banks- because the Federal Reserve
of the U.S. usually spends the most on these Black Friday bargains given to
other countries.
Sort of like when the news reports ‘10 NATO troops killed’-
Yeah 9 of the 10 are usually us.
So even though there were some good economic numbers
yesterday [new jobs- 200,000- housing sales up] yet the main reason for the
jump was the Fed offered low interest loans to the European banks.
Now- why did this help? Or did it really Help?
Let me give a crude parable. Say if you lived on ‘Uncle
Bennie’s’ block [Ben Bernanke- Fed. Chairman]. And everybody knew that uncle
Benny was loaded.
Then a few houses down you have Pedro [or Mike- don’t want
my Mexican buddies to get mad!] And Pedro has a drug habit- he likes the
Cocaine a little too much.
Now- 2 more doors down you have the main drug dealer in
town. The dealer knows that Christmas is right around the corner and he needs
some money for the family- but Pedro has already sold momma’s 400 dollars worth
of food stamps [or used the Lone Star card to by some meat and sold it at half
price- happens every day!]
So the dealer is not sure how much stuff he should
‘purchase’ on his next trip to Mexico. I mean if Pedro has no cash- then the
dealer might want to skip the monthly purchase.
But wait- uncle Benny is in the Christmas mood- and he gives
Pedro some cash- sure he tells Pedro ‘you will pay me back wont you’ Oh yeah
Benny- you know me.
Of course Benny will never see the cash again- but the
dealer thinks ‘damn- Pedro’s got some cash- might as well make the monthly
purchase’ and yeah- the DOW shot up.
Crude- sure- but the DOW- which simply represents the
present mood of business- if they think that some big purchasers- like Europe-
just got some cash- well like the dealer- they know that the sales will be up-
even if only temporary- but the odds are that Pedro will buy the goods- not fix
the roof!
So- in that sense- the market was happy. But uncle Benny
really didn’t fix anything- in fact- in some people’s eyes he made it worse.
Pedro’s family thinks ‘damn Benny- Pedro was strapped for
cash- we were hoping he would think things thru and turn his life around- but
you just prolonged the addiction’!
So Benny really didn’t fix anything- he just gave some
compulsive spenders some spending money.
So- if I were in the market right now [like at 4 a.m. as I
write] I would sell as soon as it opens today- because the ‘rent is too damn
high’ [remember that Black guy running for office a few months ago?]
Okay- let me get something a little spiritual in here. I
have been getting with the ‘Pedro’s’ of the world these last few weeks- and the
other day a funny thing happened. I was at the homeless mission where the
guys show up at around lunch time-
that’s where I have met most of the street guys over the years.
So as I’m sitting there with Henry- someone says ‘wow-
there's Roger- I haven’t seen him in years’. I couldn’t believe my eyes- yeah-
it was Roger.
Roger was/is a good friend-
met him years ago when handing out some blankets and jackets to the guys
on a cold night. I have known Roger for 25 years- we are good friends.
But around 3 years ago Roger got arrested [happened a lot]
he was drunk- walked into the grocery store and told a cop ‘I’m gonna kill
you’. Got sent to prison for that one.
So about 2 years ago Henry told me ‘John- got some bad news-
Roger died in jail’. So I felt bad- lost
a good friend. So- for the past 2 years
I thought he went ‘home’. Now- here's where it gets interesting- this past
Sunday as I was praying for the crowd- Roger pops into my mind.
Now- this has happened with friends who have died- and I
have started taking it seriously- like in a way they are part of the
brotherhood- some alive- others dead- but still alive with the Lord.
So when a dead buddy pops into my mind- I pray for/with him.
So I kinda prayed ‘Lord- in whatever way this works- use Roger as a sort of
Elder/Pastor for this old group of Corpus Christi bums’- and I left it at that.
I even wrote his name on my prayer wall- and kind of
‘ordained’ him as a spiritual brother who is in the group- though I ‘knew’ he
was dead.
And it was only a day or 2 later that he showed up!
So I realized the lord was bringing him to my mind because
he would be back on the streets soon.
Now- as I’m still shocked at seeing Roger- you know- I yelled ‘hey
Roger- I thought you were dead’. He came over and had a good talk.
And someone yells ‘wow- there’s Buck’ what? Yeah- I thought
Buck died too. Been gone for around the same time- and Henry told me Buck died.
Now- as I’m sitting there- kinda laughing about the whole
thing- saying ‘wow- I heard you guys died’. I am realizing that the main
Obituary informer was Henry- yeah- he’s the brother that’s been feeding me the
scoop.
I even told my daughter that I actually posted notes on the
Blog when the guys ‘died’- sort of like little memorial things- man- that’s
bad.
So I started to realize that Henry is not the most reliable
news source when it comes to death notices.
And as I’m thinking this thru- I realize that Henry told me
Old Vern kicked the bucket about 2 months ago. Vern ‘was’ not homeless- he was
sort of a street preacher who used to help the guys. I’m now starting to wonder
whether Vern is alive and well.
Yeah- Henrys a good buddy- but I fear I will run into some
of the old crowd one day- and the first thing they will say is ‘wow John- we
heard you died’.
[1761] COMMUNITY CHEST
Okay- we have come off of a pretty hectic week- the market
shook and raddled last week. About midweek
I was ready to do a Mea Culpa [sort of]. I mean financial advice is like
talking religion and politics- once you state your claim- it’s very hard to
admit you might have gotten it wrong.
But last week I watched the Kudlow Report for a few minutes while
channel surfing- and to my surprise he was talking the economy [and market] up.
Kudlow is usually a straight shooter- and he was saying the
4th quarter [last 3 months of
U.S. economic numbers] might see a 3.5 or maybe even 4 % rise.
For the life of me- I thought he was wrong- but he does know
more than me- so I was gonna do the Mea Culpa. Then [I think the next day?]
those wonderful Euro Zone folks decided to sell some bonds [Germany] and lo and
behold- they couldn’t get enough buyers so they shut down the auction.
Yeah- for Germany- considered the ‘most stable’ of the Euro
Zone crowd- for them to have had trouble like this- that’s a bad sign.
The credit rating
agencies already dropped the ratings for Portugal and Hungary to Junk status.
The reports came out that showed that the world’s major
banks are all preparing for a Eurozone breakup- even U.S. regulators are
telling our big banks [Citigroup] to lower their risk in the Euro Zone bond
funds.
So all in all- the DOW dropped 4.8% for the week- the worst
one week drop in 2 months- and I didn’t have to swallow the crow after all.
Okay- then why did the market jump back up another 200 or so
points yesterday?
To be honest- there really was no good reason in my view. We
came off of a jump in Black Friday sales- I think they sold 16 % more than
usual- which of course is always a good sign when consumers are ‘consuming’.
But why did we see the jump? Please- please- let’s not all
be Lemmings [you know- following the lead guy off the cliff]. Every year
companies do the ‘Black Friday’ thing-
which gets its name from- well doing great deals on the Friday after Turkey
day.
Why the name? Oh- maybe because they used to only do it on
Friday- you think?
Now- say if ‘every day’ was a Black Friday- say if we just
did Black Friday all the time- would there be a huge jump in consumer spending?
Heck yeah!
So why don’t we do it all the time? Because we would all go
bankrupt [the businesses] and end up being permanent Zuccotti park occupiers.
So to make it simple- the numbers were up- because they
started Black Friday early- like on Thursday!
Oh- the tangled webs we weave.
Those of you who remember- a couple years back the president
and congress passed some big spending deals- for consumers.
They did special tax breaks for 1st time
homebuyers- they did special deals for trading in your ‘clunker’ and getting a
new car [Cash for Clunkers]. They even gave you money to buy Green Appliances
[energy savers- not Retro looking!].
When they did this- well of course home/car sales went up-
because you were giving people ‘free money’ to buy stuff.
Now- when the numbers came in- some Dems said ‘lets just
keep doing it- after all- its working’ and the Repubs shut the thing down.
What was ‘working’? Well- when you give free money out- or
do Black Friday ever day- yes- the numbers will look good.
But these types of ‘numbers’ are fake numbers- their based
on skewed data- I mean doing these programs every so often can help some- sure-
give me a great deal on some crappy car trade in- okay- I’ll buy a car.
But what happened the next year? Both car and home sales
suffered- because these deals didn’t bring ‘new money’ in- they just moved up
those who were going to purchase anyway- but they made the purchase while the
deal was going on- and the economy- and housing markets- well they still took the hit- it was just
delayed.
Now- to the real cynical folk out there- like you guys who
can’t see that Herman Cain is an innocent man! [ Fine and Sandusky Too!] yes-
to you nay sayers- it might just look like some politicians would love to keep
giving away THE ‘FREE MONEY’ BECAUSE IT WOULD MAKE THEIR NUMBERS LOOK BETTER
FOR RE ELECTION.
And so the game goes on- it never ends.
During the years called the Intertestamental period [around 400
years B.C. to the time of Christ] the Jewish people suffered lots. During their
captivities they eventually lost their Temple and wound up living in a ‘strange
land’.
It was at this time that the Synagogues were invented- these
‘church buildings’ were not the temple- they had no sacrifices or other
priestly ceremonies- they were literally named after a word that meant ‘House
of Study’.
This word is the same word used for the Israeli legislature
today- Knesset.
During the time of Christ these synagogues were places where
the Jewish people captured/retained their culture- while being ruled by Rome.
In the Synagogue you had 2 ‘offering plates’. One was called
The Dish- this was the offering for the poor- those who needed short term help-
this went to them.
Then you had what was called The Chest. This was the ‘plate’
used for more long term type help- sort of like a welfare thing.
We also see in the writings of the New Testament that giving
to the poor- helping those in need- is a very noble [and mandated!] thing.
But when we see ‘free money’ that is ‘robbing from the rich
to give to the poor’ as a last resort type thing- well then we are using the
principle in a wrong way.
I read one article on why the Italian debt crisis [very bad
as well] was not ‘seen’ as bad as a country like France [who is on the verge of
getting downgraded too- geez- if they are having so much financial trouble-
maybe Sarkozy should cut back a little on all these ‘mini Bush’ military
ventures?]
They said even though the Italian debt crisis is real- yet
outside observers know that many Italians are well off- they have saved and
invested- and if worse comes to worse- they will just tax the wealthy.
For major outside observers to be thinking this- to be
hedging their bets on the private money being ‘taken’ to cover the debt- that’s
bad.
That’s the same language we are now seeing in our country
‘pay your fair share- flying those corporate jets- you rich S.O.B.’s!
Yes- these are all signs of the times we are in.
I have been out of the market for many years- and those who
are ‘in’ most of you lost some over this last decade- and some lost a lot.
I’m not sure what the next decade holds- but if you put some
money in The Dish- or The Chest [which is where we get the term Community Chest]
then I think you will have spent some money well- but if you simply see
investing thru the lens of how much you will get back- then I think many of you
are in for a surprise.
[1754] YAHWEH- YAHWEH- I LOVE TO SHOUT YOUR NAME!
Want to try and cover a few current events today. Last week-
when the DOW went up to around 12,300- I felt like ‘here we go again’. The news
came out ‘yes- Greece is solving their debt problem- hip- hip- hooray!’ Then of
course a day or 2 will go by and something bad happens- ‘oh- no- the sky is
falling’.
I mean it’s not even funny anymore- if the world [global]
economy learns anything from this debacle- it will be to try and put a plan in
place- where the entire global market is not going from week to week- based on
these long term payouts that the other E- Zone nations are making to Greece-
based on how much they agree to cut every few weeks.
It’s like running our govt. on the Continuing Resolutions-
having to pass these temporary deals every few months- and the markets being
drawn to the brink every couple of months- this whole way of working is not
acceptable.
But what I wanted to say- that the so called solution to the
Greek debt crisis- well it’s really not a solution at all. Yes- I think they
needed to do it [cut their bonds in half] but what they actually did- was they
did default [go bankrupt] and they reorganized their debt.
When a nation [or company- or bank] does this- they are
telling all their investors ‘you just lost a boatload of cash’. Okay- who are
these evil investors anyway?
The ‘Occupy Wall’ street guys- well they mean well- and they
have some valid points to make- but the problem is not really with the bankers-
or the ‘1-%’- that is if you simply slash the bonds/investments in half [those
evil bank people!]- you are not taking all the money from those ‘fat cats’.
In reality- lots of the average folk lose money too. Many
retirement accounts- yes- for teachers and Firemen and Cops [you know- the 99%]
are tied into these investments. Now- I hope your own 401 k was not heavily
invested in European debt- but many people’s investments are.
And when the nation [or company] says ‘hey everybody- guess
what- we fixed the problem- we simply told everybody- today is half price day-
for us’. Well yes- they reduced their debt. But they did it by ‘reducing’ the
value of everyone else that had skin in the game.
So what does this mean? It means that lots of folk took a
big hit- and these same folk [made up of all the other European nations] are
not going to be happy about it. Will they ever invest in Greek debt again? Hell
no- I don’t blame them either.
Okay John- what does this mean? Glad you asked. It means
that even though the Europeans ‘solved their debt crisis’ they solved it in a
way that will have long lasting effects on the global economy. Now- Greece is
really a small economy- we all know this- but don’t be fooled into thinking something
was ‘solved’ no- they solved it by saying ‘hey- we aint paying the people we
owe money too’ Geez- wish I could ‘solve’ my debt crisis like that.
And sure enough- before I had a chance to write the post
[warning about this very thing] yesterday we saw a global investment company go
Belly Up. It was some firm that former N.J. governor Jon Corzine ran- they
invested in these European bonds- and yes- they lost half of their investment
[billions] over night.
So- before we [U.S. investors and workers] get too happy
over the Europeans ‘fixing’ their problems [like the DOW shooting up to
12,300!] lets realize that there are still lots of problems on the horizon- and
we are not out of the water yet [the DOW also was responding to the 3rd
quarter numbers that came out- the U.S. economy did do better than expected- I
think the growth was a little over 2 %- that’s good- not great- but okay].
Okay- I also found it funny [not to demean the thing] that
the Syrians were protesting in the streets- calling for- well you guessed it- a
NO FLY ZONE.
What? A no fly zone? Assad [the Syrian leader] is not flying
planes over the protestors- he is indeed killing and torturing them- but no
planes.
So why would the Syrians [not all of them] be asking for
this? Well to them- after seeing our ‘no fly zone’ in Libya- to them it means
‘please come and hunt down our leader like a dog- kill him- his kids- his
grandkids- and when it’s all over- let a bunch of our ‘leaders’ take over- you
know- the Al Qaeda group’.
Sad- so sad.
Look- I’m sorry for the abuse that many Arab/Persian nations
have foisted upon their people- and in many ways- Assad is an S.O.B.- but we
need to find another way to deal with these crisis’- and the ‘no fly zone’
thing- well that has to stop.
One last note- last week I had a strange event take place.
As a true news junkie [I read the papers- watch the news- for about 6 hours a
day] I stumbled across a death penalty case.
I have made it a habit to pray for the cases I read in the
papers- severe crime cases- people going to prison for life- mothers who killed
their kids- yes bad cases- but case’s/people I felt the Lord wanted me to pray
for- well- for the rest of my life.
I have cut out the news articles- and written the names of
these people here in my study- and pinned them up on my prayer wall.
The list is now in the hundreds.
Okay- when I read [last Monday] that Frank Garcia was going
to be executed on Thursday- I made a mental note to simply pray for Frank for
the next 4 days.
I simply prayed for him every morning- prayed that God would
be glorified- that God would help Frank to ‘end right’ to seek God in his last
days- make any statements that need to be made- to the victims’ families or
whoever else [he killed his wife- and a cop who came to the home on the night
they were fighting].
I have done this ‘prayer vigil’ for the guys for many years-
writing the names of offenders and putting them on my prayer wall- that’s only
a few years old- but to pray for the death row guys- well I have done that for
years.
Now- for some reason- in Frank’s case- I felt the Lord
saying ‘John- you just adopted him’. What?
I have so many friends- ex-cons- addicts- street guys- and
many of them are like brothers- ‘sons’. Some of them have become Christians
thru ‘my’ ministry. The years of helping the street guys- preaching at the
jails- the whole deal.
So in franks case- it seemed like the Lord was saying ‘John-
franks in the group’.
I didn’t fully understand it- but heck- I accepted the thing
[you know- when God says something- its’ usually a good idea to believe it].
So on Thursday- I just happened to have the local news on at
6 P.M. - here in Texas the guys usually get the needle at around 6:20 P.M. and
before the news ends- they tell you the guys dead.
So as the news rolled along- I prayed for Frank for this
last 20 minutes- he wound up dying a little late- at 7.
The next day- I read 3 articles on Frank’s last words- I
have never read a testimony like this- yes- from a criminal who did indeed
commit horrendous crimes- crimes he needed to be punished for.
The article said that
when Frank entered the ‘death room’ for the entire 20 minutes or so- he simply
sang out to God- very loudly- praised Jesus- shouted ‘Yahweh- Yahweh- I love to
sing your name’ and went on like this for the whole time.
He prayed for the people in the ‘stands’ watching the show-
he prayed ‘God- for the prosecutor sitting here right now- may she never forget
this day father- may she come under conviction someday father- may she accept
Jesus some day’.
He went on and said ‘Father- for this day was I born- to
glorify you- even though I committed such terrible crimes- for which I’m sorry
for- yet to end my life glorifying you and your Son- to praise you as my God
and king- thank you father- thank you’.
The article went on to say that as the drugs began taking
effect- Frank began rattling off at the end- not able to form compete
sentences- his final word was ‘Jesus’.
The Mother of the woman Frank killed [his mother in law]
said she was shocked- that this former San Antonio gang member was always such
a quiet kid- she has never spoken to Frank since he killed her daughter- but
she saw a different person this night- someone she really did not know at all.
I’m sure the other witnesses will never forget what they
heard that night either- especially the prosecutor- who had to position herself
as an adversary- one who accuses the defendant in criminal cases- yes- that’s
her job- but by nature- she in a way had to ‘hate’ frank- yet she heard him
pray for her on the night of his death.
Yes- I never heard a ‘death row’ testimony in my life like
this one- and for some reason- I never prayed as much [you know- remembering to
pray thru out the week- and then praying for the man the actual hour he was
dying] for one either.
These last few years I have ‘sensed’ and in a strange way-
‘received’ some of my old buddies who have died years ago. Many of them were
friends I ‘lead’ to the Lord- yet they had very long histories of drug abuse
and crime- and yes- some did die as a result of that.
But these last few years- while praying in my prayer ‘spot’
[a special spot in my yard] out early in the morning- under the stars- I sense
all my ‘sons’ and friends being in this crowd- the image of John the Apostle-
seen in revelation chapter 5- he is in this heavenly throne room before God.
He is there with the angels and saints and the great Lion of
the tribe of Judah [Jesus]. It’s a picture of saints that are in heaven- and
also on earth- the book of Hebrews says those who have died- and have already
passed on- they are in the stands and cheering us on.
I know this sounds strange- but I really sense my ‘old
group’ even my buddies who are gone- they are still ‘having church’ with me under
the stars.
A few years ago- when I first started sensing this- it
seemed as if one of my old friends showed up one week- I just ‘sensed’ it.
His name was Miguel. Me and Mike grew up in N.J. together-
good friends as kids.
After high school- I joined the navy- Mike went into the
Army.
After I earned my 4 year discharge in 1 year [got kicked out
of the Navy!] I went back North and me and Mike got back together as good
buddies [he got kicked out of the Army faster than I got booted from the Navy-
yeah- he won that competition too!] we did commit a few crimes in those months-
we were no ‘angels’ but we eventually headed back to Texas.
Why Texas? Mike wanted to go to Florida- I said Texas. We
had no real plans- just two18 year old kids with no destiny.
I said ‘lets flip a coin- heads it’s Texas- tails Florida’.
I told Mike that day- I still remember the moment- sitting there in front of my
house- on a cold N.J. day- dreary day.
I said ‘hey- some day we can tell our kids that we chose [Tx
or Fla.] based on a coin flip’.
I won the flip- we left for Texas in the morning – been here
ever since.
Eventually I lead Mike to the Lord- his wife- Lu Ann- and my
wife became friends. Mike had a few boys- I had 4 girls!
Mike became a member of my little home church [we also met
in a rented hospital for a year or 2] and we were in a sense- living the dream.
Mike had a little harder time than me. He eventually went back North- and I got a
call from Mike one day- he told me had had Aids.
I stayed in touch with Mike- he wrote me a few good letters-
and one day when I came home from work- my wife said ‘John- Lu Ann called’. I
knew it- I said ‘Mike died’ she said yes.
I have Miguel’s funeral card here in my office- its pinned
up on a wall with my other friends names who have gone on- Mike was 32.
So a while back- when I started ‘sensing’ this ‘church
thing’ this reality that my friends who are still ‘on the ground’ and my
buddies who have died- well they are all here with me during those prayer
mornings- yes- in that ‘upper room’ that the apostle John was in.
One day I was praying and doing a home church thing with my
wife- we often do a simple home meeting- pray- bible reading- communion- it’s
kind of cool.
My wife tells me ‘you know- I had a weird dream the other
night. You old friend Mike showed up at the door- he rang the bell. He said he
was here- looking for you’.
Yes- I felt like God said I ‘adopted’ Frank- that in a way
he was now part of my ‘fellowship’ yes- made up of the worst of the worst- they
did say of Jesus ‘he’s friends with hookers and killers and sinners- what kind
of preacher is that!’
Yes- I like my little group. O- and this past Sunday- while
doing the early prayer thing- at the part of being in ‘the room’ with the guys-
I almost thought I could hear Frank singing- yes- he seemed to be singing
‘Yahweh- Yahweh- I love to shout your name’.
Yea- it was a good service- the best one in the world.
[1751] FOR A PAIR OF SHOES? CMON!
Yesterday I saw a few clips from a talk Joe Biden gave- he
was at some municipal type function [Cops- Firemen] and he was basically
defending the presidents ‘jobs bill’. I mean the guy really impressed me with
his mastery of the numbers.
He rattled off ‘in 2007- you had this many cops on the
street- this many rapes- this many killings’. He then went on to the following
years- you know- showing us that as the force went down in numbers- that the
violent crimes went up.
I mean- it was so smooth- you would think he was just
pulling the numbers out of the air.
As he left the hall- some reporter got him on whether or not
it was right to associate voting no on the ‘jobs bill’ with being for an
increase in rapes [Biden was saying if you vote no- then the number of cops
being let go will go up- and the rapes will go up too- according to his
numbers].
Biden kind of got into a little scuffle ‘hey buddy- don’t
you misquote me on this- this is what I said’ you know- Biden has never had
trouble with talking off the cuff like that.
Then sure enough- the Repubs got the actual numbers from the
FBI on the rapes and stuff from that city [I think he was in Boston?].
And the actual numbers were the opposite of what Biden said-
the rapes went down over the years he said they went up.
I like old Joe- he lives his life for the moment. You know-
having a few shots of J.D. with the guys at the Fire Dept. Hanging out with the
cops and all my fellow union bro’s [still am a member with the fire fighters
union] and then going to the union hall and hitting one out of the park- just
giving this soul stirring defense of the president’s policy- rattling off those
numbers like one of the local lotto ‘quick 6’ guys does at the corner store.
Then of course the thrill is short lived- sure it made you
feel great as you hung out with the boys for the rest of the day ‘Biden sure
defended us today- way to go Joe- way to go’. Then he gets back home and sees
all the clips of how he screwed up the whole thing.
You know- his wife saying ‘hey honey- look your on CNN
again- they’re making fun of you’. And Biden probably just fluffs the thing off
‘Heck- this aint the first time baby- and won’t be the last’. Oh- and by the
way- Obama’s trying to get a hold of you- ‘just tell him I’m’ busy hon- talk to
him another day’.
Ah- the more I watch these guys- the more I keep thinking of
the Don Knott’s movie ‘the gang that can’t shoot straight’ it’s sad- but at
least you can laugh as the country goes to Hades in a hand basket.
Okay- to my liberal friends- this next one is for you.
I do think very seriously that our country- and the world-
has very serious problems facing us these next few years. I do not see the
answer to these problems as being conservative or liberal- I think that both
sides really need to be able to come to the table and talk as adults- that has
not happened yet.
I’m going to defend Obama right now- just a warning to both
sides.
These past few months the U.S. has been trying to negotiate
a deal with Iraq- we originally signed an agreement with the new govt. that we
would stay in their country till the end of this year.
As the months rolled by the leadership of Iraq has had some
very shaky people join their ranks. Iraq is now considered [by many insiders]
as being part of a group of 3 nations [Iraq- Syria- Iran] that are
strengthening their ties- as sort of a buffer against the other nations in the
region.
One of the leaders in Iraq- on the official payroll- is Muqtada
Al Sadr [I’m guessing on the spelling?] Do you remember him?
This guy led his own militia during our war in Iraq. At
times we went back and forth on whether or not we should target his little
enclave and take out his personal army.
Eventually we decided to let the guy live and he finally got
on the actual team of leaders that make up the new Iraqi leadership.
This guy has killed our guys- we have killed his.
Now- a while back he agreed to putting a stop to the killing
of American soldiers in Iraq [gee thanks a lot!]. He is a religious leader with
a following- and at one time he justified [Fatwa] the killing of American
soldiers as being part of fighting the ‘infidel’ invaders from the west.
After he got in office- he agreed to tell this people ‘stop
killing them’- for good? No- just until the official agreement of our forces
staying until this year ends- but after that- he has said its open shooting
once again.
Okay- this guy is part of the Iraqi govt.- he’s telling us
he will take his guys and kill American soldiers if we stay past the deadline.
Obama has been trying to extend the deadline [at the secret
request of the Iraqi leaders- they want us to stay longer- but because of
political posturing won’t say it openly]. But in order for them to look tough
to the outsiders- they are refusing to sign an agreement that would give our
guys legal immunity if we stay.
So you have these guys playing ‘hard ball’ with our guys- we
are not asking them to pay the 800 billion dollar bill we have racked up over these
past 10 years- they have officials in their govt. who are openly saying ‘you
stay past the deadline- your dead’ and the other leaders will not grant our
guys immunity.
I would have done the same thing Obama did- you know what-
we shed blood here- your govt. has turned into a major supporter of some of our
biggest enemies in the region- and your own officials are calling for the
killing of our men- after the deadline.
Your damn right we’re not staying- no way in hell.
But we are so divided- the Repub candidates have used this
as a tool to criticize Obama- and the left has done the same dirty deeds
[Biden’s numbers game?]
This week the DOW went up to around 11,800. I’ll admit- I
did not think we would see those numbers this year- nor do I think it’s smart
for us to ‘see’ those numbers.
Why? I have said a bunch of times over this last year that
the global economy is not in good shape.
Some economists think we [the U.S. and Europe] are going
through a De- Leveraging cycle. They feel that nations/economies can only go so
long through a borrowing/spending cycle- and then they have to ‘bottom out’ and
go through a long season of deleveraging.
Many think that the west is in this phase right now- and
will be in it for a number of years.
That’s why Greece- once again- is having open rioting on the
streets. They have over borrowed- over promised- and now are doing what’s
called Austerity measures- they have to cut.
Now- in our country- we too have these same problems looming
over the horizon- we are not technically as bad as Greece [yet] but we are in
trouble.
The only way to really deal with this problem- is for both
sides to actually make some serious cuts/changes in what we call entitlement
programs [Medicare being the biggest] and yes- some type of income on the
‘revenue side’.
Not raising taxes across the board [maybe?] but doing what
many on both sides have called for- closing a lot of the loopholes that are in
the tax code and making real ‘adjustments’ to entitlements- if we don’t
seriously do this- then we will be in big trouble.
Okay- why do I think the DOW is way too high? Investors have
been looking for a sign- any sign- that they can use to hang some hope on- that
we will not go into another recession.
Sure enough- some good news did come out- and some not so
good.
Then once again- the European debt yoyo- it went up again-
the investors thought ‘o- maybe the Euro Zone will fix its debt crisis’. Look-
no matter what deal they do- they will still have a very long way to go to get
out of their problems- and their banks and economies are going to still suffer-
no matter what.
And why was Biden doing the speech? Because he was trying to
get support for Obama’s plan to send more federal money back to the states. The
states have been propped up by the stimulus package and fed. aid- and that
moneys gone.
So yes- the states are going to lay off this year- more than
any previous year- the moneys gone.
All of these things are huge problems- on a Macro level-
that are going to effect the global markets for many years to come- even if the
actual figures for business look better [many financial guys have been saying
‘the fundamentals are much better’- true- in a way].
But no business functions in a vacuum. No matter how good
the bottom line looks- if people are out of work- and banks are not lending-
and if we are really in a de leveraging cycle- then no matter how good the
‘fundamentals’ are- the ‘customers’ are broke- or can’t get a loan to buy the
good/service- see?
Okay- lets end with some bible stuff- before I lose all my
Christian readers.
A while back we were doing an over view of the entire bible-
and I probably should have done at least one last post or 2 before we stopped
[maybe will get to that in the next few weeks?]
We stopped at the O.T. prophets- and under that category-
you have what we call the Major and Minor Prophets. That’s simply a distinction
in the size of their books [Isaiah is long- major- Amos short- minor].
I did hit on Isaiah some- and for a minor prophet- if I
could only do one- it would be Amos.
Amos was a very strong defender of the poor- the weak ones
in society. He railed against the rich- and the powerful- ‘you sell the poor
for a pair of shoes- there is no justice in the land’.
In a way- you could fit him in at one of the Occupy Wall
Street rallies.
Amos also condemned the ‘church folk’ he said [like the
other prophets too] that the religious people were having great meetings- they
were rejoicing in their religious life- they had a great time ‘practicing’
their religion [every day a Friday?] Yet there were many injustices in the
land- things that God was not happy with.
And these things were the uneven balances that existed in
their day.
When he said ‘you sold the poor for a pair of shoes’ yes-
the ‘market’ was that bad- that you could ‘buy a slave’- that cheap. Was it ‘just’ simply because that was the
market value?
Hell no- people have more value than a damn pair of
shoes! What about his injustice ‘rant’?
That spoke specifically about ‘justice in the courts’ the
rich were able to ‘buy’ a better outcome in the courts- than the poor.
Man- if these things are not signs of our times- then I have
no idea what is.
Okay- I’m glad the President did what he did on the troop
thing- if your country can’t guarantee immunity to our guys- yeah-were gonna
get the hell out.
Oh- one last thing- I think I hear a phone ringing- all the
way from Delaware- yes Joe- someone wants to talk to you- and soon.
[1704] DO THE HUSTLE?
One time Jesus was engaging with the religious folk- and he
said they were like kids/people in the market place. They said ‘we piped and
you did not dance- we mourned and you didn’t respond how we wanted you to
respond’ [my paraphrase].
A few years back a lot of things changed with me [us-
ministry]. As a ‘ministry’ I never took money for personal use- no salary-
nada. And eventually I ‘forsook’ all money. That is in the first few years as a
home church- we did take offerings- and it was used to meet the needs of
people.
When we did rent a place to meet- we used some for the
expenses. But as I progressed [some say digressed!] I just cut the whole
offering thing off. On the radio- we [I] was the only person who actually paid
out of pocket for the air time. Though you had others who never asked for
money- yet these shows were underwritten by their church.
So I just said ‘from now on- I will not take money- for
anything’. I also quit claiming my giving [which was a lot- considering the
radio alone] for tax purposes. I simply wanted to give the example that being
‘in ministry’ is not some type of business that you have to constantly be
prodding people to ‘give to God’. I realized that much of what we call
‘ministry’ is simply well meaning people- setting up Christian non profit
organizations- and then developing a mechanism to get others to ‘support the
work’.
Some churches teach ‘church membership’ but many times what
they mean is- after you come for a while- we want you to commit to giving 10 %
of your salary to the church.
Other ministries take various approaches.
After I retired from the Fire Dept. I got into a bind- I
lost my health insurance- it was too expensive to keep- so I dumped the thing.
This left me in a curios spot- I was still helping lots of the people out
[homeless- church friends] and sometimes I would pay a bill or 2 for them-
maybe 100- 150 dollar type thing- and I would be out that month. Yes- I live
off of a retirement check- just a little over what some of these friends were
getting- if you add in the Medicare/Medicaid- and some had disability/s.s.
checks.
I guess they didn’t realize that paying a bill or 2-
actually- really left me broke. Now- I didn’t complain [unless you count this
post as a complaint!] but at times- after doing the ministry this way- I always
found it strange that people still questioned me [and others in general] about
the ‘money motives’ of ministry.
I had a relative call me and straight out question me on why
I was not financially supporting another family member [kind of a bold thing to
ask- out of the blue] I knew this relative was quite rich- multimillionaire? At
least in the category of a millionaire. They said ‘if your spending all this
money on your homeless friends- why don’t you use some of the funds for so and
so’ I said ‘what funds are you talking about’?
They then realized I was basically doing the stuff from my
measly check- yes- as bad as that sounds- that’s the deal.
Then they were upset that I was ‘wasting money’ on helping
people.
Like Jesus said ‘we made music for you- and you didn’t
dance’ that is people see ‘ministry/church’ as ‘we expect you to respond in a
certain way’ and sad to say- because of this very subject- money- many
preachers/churches do ‘adjust’ their messages based on how well the giving went
in the previous month.
Needless to say- the whole thing at times seems to be a vast
wasteland- coming up with all types of ‘bible verses’ and telling people ‘if
you don’t give- your testing- robbing God’ geez- we better make sure were using
that verse in context [Malachi] because in most of these scenarios we are not-
and then to falsely charge people with ‘robbing God’ that’s pretty darn bad.
I don’t blame my friends for not realizing that at times- me
helping them out- well- it did put me in a bind. And sometimes- they don’t
realize that because I don’t have health care benefits- that if you actually
added everything up- many of these friends are actually making the same [or
more] than me.
I just feel like we all need to do our best to help others-
don’t assume that people have money- or that they are in it for the money. Many
times people are just doing what they feel they are required to do.
And of course- you’ll always have the friend/relative who
wants you to do a dance for them- to justify- for them- why you do what you do-
never mind that they are worth a hundred times more than you- and they are in much better shape to help the
relative- no- that’s none of my business. But when they Pipe [make music] they
just want you to dance- geez- I never was a good dancer- why start now?
[1698] PEOPLE LAUGHING- PEOPLE SINGING- A MAN SELLING ICE
CREAM
These past few days I have been reading scriptures on the
influence of the church in the nations- that is God’s original purpose for the
church- to have a people/nation that he could reveal his glory though. This
morning I read Zechariah chapter 8- it talks about God restoring Jerusalem and
that there will be old men and women dwelling in it- little boys and girls
playing in the streets once again.
The impression you get is a sort of ‘block party’ atmosphere-
all types of people enjoying life once gain- after a season of captivity. As I
read the verse on the old men and women- I thought of Aunt Bee.
Bee was the aunt of one of our original church members.
Emmet [Senior- I have also talked about his son on the site- Jr.] became a
church member early on. I don’t remember if I met him while preaching at the
county jail- or through Elias- another friend who struggled with addiction.
Both of them were long time drug addicts.
I would pick up Emmet at his Aunt’s house every week for
church- and just visit him every so often. The ‘church’ was a little home group
I started from scratch. I fixed up my 2 car garage- and the guys I met from the
streets- or at the jail- would become the core group.
Over time Aunt Bee- who raised Emmet- started coming to our
meetings- and as an older lady- in her 70’s- she would tell me she was learning
the bible for the first time- she really liked it.
I was basically filling the slot that she missed out on- the
bible study aspect of Christianity. Bee was a good Catholic lady- and she told
me her friends said ‘why do you go to brother Johns’ church- your Catholic’ she
would tell them ‘because I learn things’.
I never tried to ‘convert’ Bee- she stayed Catholic- and
that was fine with me. Many Protestant bible churches do fill a need that some
of the historic churches lack- simple bible study. Yet many of the Protestant
‘bible’ churches lack what the historic churches offer- a historic connection
to traditional Christianity.
During the Reformation of the 16th century- the
Protestant reformers [who were all initially Catholic] fought with the Roman
church over doctrinal issues- and during this fight the reformers stated a few
main principles- one of which is called Sola Scriptura- which means ‘the bible
alone’.
What they meant by this was on issues where the church could
not come to agreement with the dissenters- that at the end of the day- the
bible would have the final say.
Now- the common mistake many Protestants fall into- is thinking
that this principle means ‘Solo Scriptura’
is a belief that all Christianity is simply a process of
reading/organizing your life around the bible. That is the view that the bible
is all there is.
This is not the historic Protestant position- the reformers
themselves [Calvin. Luther, etc.] referred often to the early writings of the
church fathers [Augustine] in trying to prove their points.
I have found it helpful over the years to spend time
reading/hearing the voice of the historic church- as well as being up on the
bible. The other day I moved a few books from my office into a shelf in the
living room- I read an article on how people are selling books ‘by the inch’
just to decorate their homes. What types of books- that didn’t matter- they were
just for show [ouch!]
So I figured I’ll move the real McCoy- classics that I have
read and re-read over the years.
I was glad to see that I still had the Confessions of Saint
Augustine- a classic from the 4th century. Augustine was a Catholic
bishop from Hippo- North Africa. He is often associated with the doctrine of
Predestination [which he did believe in] and is loved by many Catholics and
Protestants alike.
The major reformer who launched the reformation was Martin
Luther- a German Augustinian monk- Luther was also a strong believer in the
doctrine of predestination- though its common to associate the doctrine with
John Calvin, Luther too was a strong believer in it.
One day Aunt Bee shared a story with me- she used to visit
her daughter who lived in Alaska- her daughter sort of felt like her cousin
Emmet was taking advantage of her mom. I was familiar with the environment- my
older sister- who has also been a drug addict for many years- has lived with my
mom her whole life.
When addicted people live with their parents [aunts] as they
age- they fall into an environment where they manipulate the guardian to get
what they want [money- borrow the car, etc..]
So Aunt Bee’s daughter felt like Emmet took advantage of her
mom. Aunt Bee told me about an Indian she saw one time while visiting Alaska-
he was panning for gold in one of the freezing streams- and was wearing an
Indian loin cloth and was in the ice cold water. She said how interesting it
was to see how other cultures learn to adapt to their environment.
Bee was an educator- she taught at A&I university
[Kingsville- Tx.] for many years [now called A&M] and her students were
some of the most famous people in Texas- Senators and congress people. I found
it interesting how an influential person like Bee- would wind up learning the
bible from some Jersey boy- preaching in a garage [I was around 25 at the
time].
Bee was a good person- she died many years ago- as has
Emmet. Emmet eventually broke the drug habit and married another church member-
Janie. She was s single mom with lots of kids- they made a very nice couple.
Emmet died at around the age of 50- his liver went out- too many years of drugs
eventually got to him. As a matter of fact- Elias- who I think first introduced
me to Emmet- he eventually became a preacher and pastored his own church. He
started with me- was the song leader and filled in on the days I had to work-
and eventually took a position with a church called Victory Outreach- a
ministry to addicts.
One day while working at the fire house- I was riding on the
ambulance that day and we got a call. As I got to the house- I realized it was
Elias’s house- he had a brain aneurism that day- he went into a coma and died a
few days later.
I met Elias around 8 years earlier- preaching to him at the
jail. Gave him his first bible- which he would always remind me about- and
walked with him for a few years. He was ex-air force. He did at least 4 years
before he got out and got hooked on hard drugs- mainline addict.
We had lots of good times together- I see his boys every so
many years when I venture into Bishop [a small city around 40 miles from where
I live]. I think his wife- Janie- still lives there.
The bible says Gods city [a symbol of the church] has old
people having fun in the streets [the aunt Bee types] and little boys and girls
playing in the streets [too many names to mention in this one- Elias &
Janie alone had around 6 kids- Janie & Emmet too- different Janies!].
God’s church/family is a great one- it consists of the great
church fathers [men like Augustine] and it extends to the little kids playing
in the streets of some small town in South Texas- it even includes those who
society has rejected- those who have failed many times in life- and they know
it- more than anyone else.
I read a verse the other day- in Psalms ‘sins prevail
against us- yet you will save us from our transgressions’ I thank God that he
helps people- people who have things that ‘prevail’ against them- he often uses
these people to help others- Gods ways are sometimes very hard to understand-
his ways are not ours.
[1695] WHAT MATTERS?
The other day I mentioned how believers have a habit of
getting caught up in certain ‘religious’ views [tithing was the example I gave]
and over time these views develop to a point where they take precedence over
the things Jesus actually placed real value on.
In the 1st century when Jesus showed up on the
scene- the religious practices of Gods people were centered around religious
meetings [holy days] prayer, fasting and tithing- mainly to be seen of men-
that is religion digressed to a point where what seemed to be the most
important thing- was actually not important.
So how did Jesus respond? He spends the 3 very public years
of ministry- healing the sick, telling the poor they are the blessed ones who
will inherit Gods kingdom- and blasting the rich- and those in power- by
telling them that their day was coming too.
In essence Jesus was the ultimate prophet- he followed the
long line of Jewish prophets who took these same positions. The prophet Isaiah
told the people ‘God is tired of all your religious activities- your church
meetings- your special ‘sacrificial’ offerings- these things are a stench in
his nose!’ then he would go on and say that God wanted justice for the poor and
widow.
Amos also rebuked the rich and defended the poor- Ezekiel
said the shepherds [religious leaders] were fleecing the sheep- they were
leaders who were making a financial killing off of the people.
All of these things- in today’s world of ‘ministry’ are
making a comeback- it’s just we don’t see it because they are dressed in a
different way. But at the end of the day- for the most part- American style
Christianity is usually measured by how much money you give [or take in] how
faithful your are to attend religious meetings- and how famous your ministry
is- are you a really gifted speaker? Or do you give a great ‘stage’ performance.
And in the mind of the average Christian- if you ask them
‘when was the last time you gave of your goods to your neighbor- reached out to
the poor- showed your Christianity thru charity’? Often times they will answer
that that is not ‘their ministry’ or that their giving to some Christian
organization/church is their role- and it’s up to ‘the church’ to actually help
the poor.
But these responses miss the main point- Jesus [and the
prophets] were saying that’s the mistake- thinking that ‘religion’ consists in
these outward religious acts- which are really for show- while the true acts of
mercy and love are all too often neglected. People today have made the same
mistake as the religious observers of Jesus day.
The letter of James- written by the brother [half] of Jesus-
tells us that Pure religion- is to keep yourself unspotted form the world- and
to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction. That’s it. No mention
of religious holy days? No. No mention of special tithes/offerings? No. But
what does he have to say about the modern religious view of the accumulation of
wealth? Let’s not even go there [believe me- it’s pretty bad- go read the
letter- its short].
This week in Somalia the estimates are 11 million people are
on the verge of starvation- 2 to 3 million are kids. The world at large has had
a hard time getting the food/resources in- because the country [like many other
African nations] is in a sort of civil war.
The militant Islamic group fighting the govt. [Al Shabbab- I
think that’s the name?] are made up of children. Yes- the kids have taken up an
armed resistance against the leaders- and they are killing each other. I saw a
news report on Mosaic world news- and the kids were in the streets- sort of
like any kids on a block- but they had guns.
One young kid [10?] was pulling on the rifle of an older boy
[15?] and the older boy got mad- like some school yard thing. The older boy
just pulled away- and pointed the gun at the ‘opposing kids’- at the same time-
they were playing in the street- throwing rocks and waving sticks- and pointing
loaded guns at each other- it was like it was a game- they were used to
shooting each other if they had to.
There are many things happening in our world today- things
that matter to God. Many Christians- though they mean well- seem to leave these
other things up to others. They feel that if they can just make it through
another week- attend religious meeting on Sunday- put in the tithe- that if
they live up to these outward religious standards- that they have done well.
Jesus taught a different way- the apostles tried to follow
in his way. The apostle John said ‘if you see your fellow man in need- and
don’t actually help him- do what needs to be done to defend them- then how can
you say Gods love is in you’ [my paraphrase].
The apostle Paul wrote the Colossians- he said ‘I’m worried
about you- you are observing days and times and other outward religious rites-
I’m afraid you are falling away from the true faith’.
There was always a danger that Christians would fall into
this rut- this thing where they unconsciously make the least important things-
the most important. When the religious leaders of Jesus day were conspiring to
kill Jesus- they had a problem- if they killed him on the wrong day- it would
mess up their religious festival going on at the time. If they had to deal with
the dead body- on the wrong day- they would be technically unclean according to
Jewish law- and it would throw off their game.
So they worked it out where they would kill Jesus- and leave
the body alone on the Sabbath- and they had it all worked out. One problem-
they were violating the most important commandment of all- given to them by
their most important law giver [Moses] that said ‘thou shalt not kill’ but
somehow- over a period of time- they saw these things as the most important-
their special observances of holy days- keeping themselves ceremonially clean-
not ‘unspotted from the world’ as James said- but religiously clean- so they
could put on a good public show.
I just finished praying for a bunch of stuff- of course I
prayed for the kids in Somalia- those dying and those killing. Yes- I also send
money every month to the starving kids- but these things are not enough. I [we]
need to also engage those around us- those hurting and dying and struggling in
real ways. We need to make the most important things- important again.
[1692] HARRY POTTER
This year we ‘celebrate’ the end of an era- Harry Potter. I
caught an interview last night with the publisher who put out her books. He
explained that he was the only one willing to take the risk- because kid’s
books- at a time when computer games and high tech stuff are all the craze-
that trying to get kids into books again, well that seemed like a tough sell.
Yet J.K. Rowling went after it- and the rest is history.
Some [most] preachers/Christians have been against Rowling’s fables- why? Of
course she is introducing ‘soft witchcraft’ into her themes. The church has
traditionally been against all forms of fortune telling. Horoscopes, astrology
and the like.
And I have been surprised about how many friends over the
years have asked me about whether or not doing the Palm Reading thing is okay
for a Christian. The fact is the bible condemns- in no uncertain terms- all of
these practices. But the bible does speak about spiritual gifts- prophecy,
dreams- etc. These types of gifts are different from all these other forms of
sorcery and witchcraft- these gifts originate from God- and they are
acceptable.
Okay- having said all this- is there any good that come from
Potter? Actually- there is. Even though Rowling has used these other forbidden
themes- yet you also need to look at the overall theme of the books. For
instance- do they have ideas about good versus evil? Yes. Do they introduce
kids back to the lost art of reading? Yes.
So overall I think its okay for kids to read her stuff- with
the parental warning of ‘
Little Johnny/Suzie- you know there is really no such thing
as White Magic- all good comes from God- and evil from satan [and mans sinful
nature]’.
I have sitting here a bunch of new teaching series from
various scholars. I’m going thru one on the origins of the church- taught by an
ex Benedictine Monk [Luke Timothy Johnson] who is an accredited scholar. Has
lots of degrees and teaches at Harvard. The other series is an entire overview
of the bible- with all the historical and theological data mixed in.
This series is also taught by a scholar- R.C. Sproul. Why
mention this? One of my homeless buddies was over a few days ago- he loves
learning- he walks thru my study [we usually hang out in the yard] and he says
‘who needs a university- you have everything right here’. Well- I have lots of
great stuff- but a university I’m not.
The point is- we should try and do our best to learn from
people who know stuff- people who are educated. Way too much of what is
produced today from the ‘church’ is really at a low level. Now- I know I have
been hard on ‘preachers’ in the past- and have criticized the abundance of
TV/radio stuff that is simply ‘God is the answer’ which of course is true- but
must we spend billions of dollars every year- for the simple exercise of having
‘our pastor’ say the same thing- that everyone else is saying- at a charge of
millions of dollars?
We need to re think this stuff.
I had a talk with a friend the other day- I was discussing
some of this with him. I told him how we [Christians] have taught people ‘if
you don’t give 10 % of your money into the basket on Sunday- you are cursed-
you are robbing God’. This teaching comes from the Old Testament Tithe-
primarily taken from a proof text in the book of Malachi.
I said ‘now- when we use this verse- this way- we are
usually telling the people that this teaching is mandated by God- to support
his work’. Okay- I have been taught this over the years- but the part we
usually leave out- is the actual teaching- from the bible- on the Tithe.
In the Old Testament the Jewish people were required to
Tithe- it was more like an income tax than an offering [like the way we think
of offering]. This tax was used for 3 things. A third was used to support the
Levitical priests, a third was used for banquets and feasts [and wine!] and a
third was used to meet the needs of the poor [a welfare system].
Now- the part that went to the priests- none of it could be
used for personal wealth growth. The priests were not permitted to have
personal wealth. They were taken from the tribe of Levi [one of the 12 tribes
of Israel] and they were forbidden to own their own land/inheritance.
So if we taught the ‘biblical’ tithe- it would be using a
third for the poor- a third for parties, and the rest went to ‘the preachers’
who were forbidden to own real estate [have personal wealth].
Now- after all the years of people teaching the Tithe- all
the many hours of telling believers ‘you are robbing God if you don’t Tithe’
how hard can it be to simply do one teaching on the actual Tithe?
I mean I just taught the whole thing- and it took a few
minutes.
But the contemporary church is consumed with practical
stuff- and to many- it’s not practical to say ‘oh- and by the way- the
preachers/pastors- according to the Tithe system- are not permitted to own
stuff’ that lifestyle just doesn’t fit the modern picture.
Okay- my point today is not to condemn giving money to
churches- but it’s to nudge us towards a more ‘enlightened’ Christianity- a
church that asks- and seeks for truth.
A literate people- who read!
So today I think we can commend Rowling for re introducing a
lost art- the art of learning. Though we as Christians do have difficulty with
‘sorcerer’s stones’ yet the fact that kids are reading again- well that’s a
good thing in my book.
[1691] GREAT EXPECTATIONS? Warning- this post is graphic
The other week we celebrated Fathers day. I was getting
ready to buy a new computer and figured- wait- let me just tell my daughters
[4] that instead of getting me different stuff I don’t need, just by me the PC.
They kinda scoffed at the idea- my wife said ‘John-
computers are expensive’ I said ‘Okay- I’ll pay the balance- whatever they
want- they can put down- I’ll cover the rest’. I really wasn’t expecting a free
computer- I just thought it was a good idea. I even told them ‘hey- my
birthdays coming up- just count this as a combination present’ look- I tried my
best.
So as the week wore on- I would drop hints- you know- trying
to see if they made the purchase. I am notorious at this kind of stuff. Every
year around Christmas time I would always trick my girls into confessing what
my wife bought me. I mean I would do what needed to be done- as crass as ‘hey
Debbie- want to make 10 bucks’ yes- I go low.
Of course my wife would get mad ‘I’m gonna bring the
presents back if you keep doing this!’ I swore my scheming days were over. Then
one year they asked what I wanted- I said ‘I know- get me a BB gun’ what? Yeah-
I want the classic kids toy- that toy that kids from all cultures and races
covet- the toy little Ralphie shot his eye out with- yeah- that’s the one.
So the weeks went by- I tried my best to get the girls to
confess- their older now [around 10 years ago] they know how to spot my tricks.
So after weeks of doing my best bargaining- I gave up.
Then my wife comes home from work- and as soon as she walks
in the door- I say ‘They told me you got me the BB gun’ boy was she mad- she
looked at them [and me] and said ‘I told you not to tell him!’ They replied-
‘we didn’t’ ah yes- I still had the skill.
So as Fathers day approached- they wouldn’t budge- the day
arrived and I even gave them directions on where I wanted to set it up in the
study- I spent a couple of days running the cord and all.
As the day wore on- I realized that this time it was no
game- they simply decided to not get me a gift. I kidded them about it [one of
the girls did by me a nice plant] and we really never do stuff for Father’s day
to be honest- I don’t like doing birthdays [for me] or stuff like that. Sure-
maybe order out for dinner- nothing big.
My girls were kind of feeling a little guilty- far be it for
me to put a guilt trip on them. Becky asks ‘hey dad- what do you want for your
birthday’. I said ‘I know- do they sell any type of medication at the store-
maybe some natural home health remedy- something that can help a person
overcome a feeling of depression- the type you feel when you get nothing for
Father’s day’.
Yes- the schemer still lives.
Okay- let me try and cover a few things. Last week I was
talking to my homeless buddy Henry- we got into a discussion about the buzz on
Perry possibly running for Pres. I told him I really wasn’t too excited about
it- I can see it now- the media portraying him as a whacky evangelical- and
Obama of course is the candidate that you should never question about his
church beliefs.
Sure enough the talk has started. The MSNBC crowd has already
said they think Perry is a Marjoe [the story of the fake boy evangelist] and of
course Bachman’s ‘pray the gay away’ clinic has made it to prime time news.
These stupid arguments usually leave carnage on the floor.
Stephen Tyler’s [Aerosmith] bio has been on the best seller list for a few
weeks now. He tells the story of going to an abortion clinic with his 5 month
pregnant girl friend. As they go in for the procedure- he thinks it’s a simple
procedure that makes the pregnancy just go away. You know- this is a woman’s
right!
As she lies on the table- the doctor sticks a needle into
her. She begins going into forced labor- and the baby comes out- alive and
screaming. Tyler stands in shock as he sees this tiny human- this person that
he thought was just a blob of cells- crying for help- love- life.
They all stand there- seeing this beautiful 5 month old
preemie struggling for life. Eventually the baby goes silent- the damage done.
Tyler’s friends will later say that he became a different person after that-
much more violent and angry. The story is simply the true telling of the life
of a rocker- and Tyler has no behind the scenes agenda- he just told the truth-
the shock and feeling of disgust over what happened.
The reason I’m leery about possibility of the ‘Texas
Evangelical’ versus the ‘enlightened liberal’ is because these real life
tragedies get lost in the debate. One time former senator Rick Santorum showed
a picture of an unborn child- around the same age as Tyler’s kid. He was on the
floor of congress and had it up there. I mean there is no way you could deny
that what was on the screen was human. He asked Senator Barbara Boxer if what
she saw was a baby or not. Boxer replied that it was beyond her pay grade to
make that decision- that she did not see it as her responsibility to judge
whether or not her consent to the killing of these babies was humane.
Yet this same congress can judge ‘crimes against humanity’
when a leader on the other side of the globe threatens to go after those who
have raised up an armed insurgency against him- a civil war.
Sometimes our expectations are too high- we expect more from
others than what we get. As these debates move forward this coming year- we
need the integrity to do what’s right- not what’s politically expedient- but
what’s right. I have never- ever- been able to justify the deaths of these
preemies- after seeing the actual pictures of the babies- real little babies-
being mutilated- this act is atrocious- it is equal to the slaughter of the
innocents under Hitler’s regime- yes- it’s that bad.
I don’t expect too much out of our leaders- but I at least
would hope that when they see the body of a beautiful little baby- perfectly
formed- lying on a table- screaming for its life while the mother and father
and doctor watch- that we can at least say that this is no surgical procedure-
no ‘right to privacy’ being carried out- this my friends is murder- pure and
simple.
[1684] A GLASS OF WINE ON THE HOUSE?
Henry’s been coming around a lot these last few days. I
didn’t realize that he probably was feeling a little guilty/worried. A few
weeks ago I gave Henry some money- wrote him a check for around 25 dollars.
I was supposed to do a few things with Henry- and I would
always miss him. Last week I hit the grocery store and bought a bunch of good
BBQ- we were going to head to Bishop for a fellowship- I went to pick up Henry
at the boat dock where he works, and he wasn’t there.
I asked one of the kids if he knew where Henry was- he told
me he had jury duty. What! Yeah, the week before he did get a notice to show
up- it was legit. The homeless guys use various ministry addresses for their
home address. I guess they found Henry because he votes.
They use the voting info for our local juries. I will admit
I got a laugh out of it- I thought there was no way they would pick him. So
anyway he comes by a few days later and he tells me the scoop. He made it
through the first round and went back a few times as they trimmed the field.
He was telling me that it was a local corruption case
against the cops. Now- I will admit, I have had my run in’s with the local
cops. Over the years they really have harassed a lot of my homeless buddies.
Lots of the guys live in various camps around this area.
I live in a sort of beach area- and there are lots of
transients that set up temporary tents as their spots. One time I bought a nice
tent for some friends- a big tent. A husband and wife couple used it. They were
so grateful to get the thing. It only cost me around 100 bucks- well worth the
sacrifice.
The next time I saw them they told me the cops came through
and cut the tent. Our local cops do this because they get lots of complaints
about the ‘bums’. Then one time I’m helping a homeless guy move from a camp. As
were driving away some ‘cop’ walks up to my truck [he had a shirt on that said
Corpus Christi Police] and starts questioning me- why I was in the area and
all.
I had 2 of my buddies with me [Henry was one of them] and
they are used to getting harassed. But as the ‘cop’ is talking to me I realize
he’s an auxiliary cop [rent a cop type guy]. Now- I have worked with volunteer
firefighters for years- and they are good guys- but sometimes we had a problem
with them walking around town wearing our Fire Dept. shirts.
They were allowed to have them- but they were not supposed
to be acting like they were the ‘real deal’. It would get the real guys [like
me] in trouble. So I discerned that this cop was like that- plus he’s
practically interrogating me.
I had it- I told him ‘I’m pulling over right here and
getting out’. I did- he made sure he was back on his property- fast.
It’s just a long term thing- dealing with the cops harassing
the guys. So Henry’s telling me his court ordeal- and when he tells me it’s a
cop case- it was funny. He says they asked him ‘do you have any relationships
with the local force’ [being it’s a corruption case]. I kid Henry and say- ‘did
you tell them- well kind of- I hold a special affinity for the local police
chief- I see him as a surrogate Father figure’ Henry just started cracking up.
He was finally kicked off the jury- I think they realized
Henry might have been a loose cannon.
Okay- Back to the top- when Henry came by he wanted me to
know that he ‘lost’ the check I gave him- and he said he signed it. I kind of
picked up the feeling that Henry might have bought a bottle of wine- and he
might have thought I found out and was mad at him.
Now- Henry is not a drunk- I have never seen him drink. But
I do know that he likes to drink a glass of wine every so often. Even though
I’m not a tee totaler- yet I have told the guys not to buy alcohol with any
money I give them.
It’s just the principle of the thing- too many guys are
alcoholics and I didn’t want to contribute to that it any way. So I think Henry
might have used some of the money for a bottle. Okay- if so I would not be mad-
water under the bridge.
But lots of people do get mad- they will cut guys off for
stuff like this- and I think that was playing on Henrys mind. So he asks me if
I could check on ‘the check’ to see if maybe someone cashed it- with his name
on it of course.
So at about this time I’m beginning to catch on- and I tell
Henry ‘you know Henry- my bank called and told me that someone did cash it-
they asked me to come down and check the video’ okay- Henry’s kinda sweating at
this point- I go on ‘and I went down to the bank and sure enough- I see a
church van leaving the parking lot- it was brother Rey!’
Rey is a local street preacher who Henry works with- he’s
had some tuff times recently so I fibbed a bit. Henry realized I was letting
him off the hook- that it wasn’t a big deal to me- even if he had a glass of
wine on the house.
I have noticed- many times- that people who do help the
guys- if they feel the guys might have swindled them- or if the guys are not as
grateful as they should be- some people leave- for good. I think true
friendships should be able to ride this stuff out- Plus- I need to stay on good
terms with the homeless guys- you never know- they might be my jury one day?
[1677] PREACH THE GOSPEL?
Let’s talk some about the role of the church in society.
Many years ago I had a friend who was a preacher/pastor- at the time some
people kindly told him ‘brother- I know Jesus is the answer- but you need to
also teach- you can’t just say ‘Jesus is the way’ all the time’.
Were they right? In a way- yes. Let me explain. In the book
of Isaiah we read about the purpose of Jesus [chapter 11]. Jesus came to preach
the gospel [good news] to the poor- set captives free- to preach the acceptable
year of the Lord.
The book of Amos [a prophet in the Old Testament] shows Amos
railing against the rich- the powerful- as he defends the poor in society. Part
of ‘the gospel’ is speaking out against injustices in society- telling those in
power ‘your day is coming- you have trampled down the innocent- abused the
immigrant- and God hears their cry’.
Yes- a part of the ministry of the church is to address
these abuses in society. Now- what happens when the church casts off this job?
It gets picked up by any/all others who are willing to run with it. So you have
‘the media’ or even a comic like Jon Stewart- anyone else who is willing to
speak out against injustices- uneven scales- these will fill the void if Gods
people won’t.
If you read the ministry of Jesus- the things he did and
said- he often came up against religious forms of holiness. Those in society
who thought their purpose was to- well be ‘religious’. That is they made a
special class out of religion. They often engaged in public displays of it [prayer-
fasting to be seen of men].
They valued their own religious experience as the primary
thing- when they perceived man getting in the way of their expression of
religion- they were willing to ‘sacrifice him’ [literally] in order for their
own religious cause to gain influence [they said of Jesus- if he keeps doing
this we will lose our position of power and influence].
At the end of the day- these religious folk saw their own
view of religion as the primary thing- it took precedence over all other things-
even people themselves.
Now- when the church reduces her mission to ‘religious
speech’ that is when they refuse to engage in society- to do what the prophets
did in the bible- defend the poor- rail against injustice- when Gods people
leave this part of ‘preaching the gospel’ out- then they unknowingly have given
in to the temptation to see their practice of religion- as simply a ‘religious
thing’.
In a way- they have become like the religious folk of Jesus
day- so busy carrying out their religious tasks- that the voiceless of society
have no one to advocate for them.
We are living in a day where many major upheavals are taking
place- I think the ‘average person’ does not fully understand the seriousness
of what’s going on in the world today. It is quite possible that the U.S. will
default on her debt. And that we will face a credit crisis equal to that of
Greece- where the politicians have pandered to the people to a point where the
people are rising up in the streets because they refuse to see the reality of
the situation.
There are threads of this taking place right now in this
country- at the current rate we are going- our debt will equal our GDP in 10
years- that’s really bad.
As we have these debates- we must remember that the poor and
impoverished of the world count to God- the cause of the illegal alien means a
lot to God- these issues are not just nationalistic- they are of concern to
God.
As we move down this treacherous road over these next few
years- lets not forsake that part of the gospel that calls us to speak up for
the poor- to speak truth to power- and to expose injustice wherever we see it-
not just on the opposing team.
[1667] VARIOUS MUSINGS
Took a ride to the city of Bishop the other day- on the way
I had a tire blowout on the highway [no spare] and managed to drive it [still
had air in it- the radial tread ripped off] to a shop to get a new tire. I had one
of my homeless friends with me and we were gonna have a fellowship day with
Eliseo at his ranch- instead we will do one this Wednesday.
Those of you in the area who know where Eli lives- we will
be there at around noon. Bring some food and meet us there, everyone is
invited. As a side note- Eli, I got your message last night. I think little
Rudy called too- I will try and get back with him, if he wants I’ll pick him up
Wednesday for the ride.
Okay- after the blowout I did a fish fry/b.b.q. at the house
with Henry and Chris [homeless bro’s] and we had a great time. My only mistake
was I put the fish out first- about 10 pieces- and I thank the Lord I at least
got 1!
Let me try and hit a few things today. Last week I had a
good visit with a J.W. [Jehovah’s Witness]. He rang the bell and I told him I
was a Christian and that I love having discussions and I did about a 20 minute
historical overview of Christianity and the development of the doctrine of the
Trinity [which is a major sticking point] and I tried to come down in a nice
way- being honest about the historic problems many believers/various groups
have had with the doctrine- and at the end of the talk I of course emphasized
the bible verses that do indeed speak about the Deity of Christ and left it at
that.
He was nice enough to come back by around an hour later and
he dropped off a pamphlet put out by their group that discusses the Trinity. He
asked me to read it and I did.
The teaching was fairly honest about the various historic
disputes that Christians have had over the Trinity. It did cover the reality
that there were Bishops and early church leaders who did indeed argue against
the doctrine. It did a good job at showing how some early Christian leaders
were indeed influenced by Greek philosophy and that some think that that’s
where the doctrine developed from.
The pamphlet made the case that ‘the bible’ does not teach
the Deity of Christ- and that these doctrines were later introduced by Catholic
church leaders who paganized Christianity primarily thru Constantine’s
‘baptism’ of Christendom with the Roman state.
I’m very familiar with all these debates- many Christian
scholars have made this exact same argument. Muslims and Jews also reject the
doctrine of the Deity of Christ [and the Trinity] and often times you hear
these same arguments made.
During the 4th century of the Common Era
Constantine became the Roman Emperor and the church hotly debated these issues.
The Bishop Arius [who denied the deity of Christ- that Christ is God] fought against
the opposing view [that Christ is indeed God] and the bishop Athanasius was the
warrior who defended the deity of Christ.
After Athanasius died his tombstone would read ‘Athanasius
against the world’ he was the driving force in the 4th century who swayed
the tide back to orthodoxy.
Now- the church would have a few 4th [and 5th]
century church councils that would settle the matter concerning the nature of
Christ and his deity- and the final decision was that the Trinity was indeed
true and the Jesus is indeed God.
The other side stayed with the idea that Jesus was a created
being- a god- but not thee God. Some of these churches exist till this day.
They are primarily oriental churches. If you visit them they seem just like any
other ancient type church- the Mass, Saints, Mother Mary- yes- the whole 9
yards. But they stuck with the Arian view [Bishop Arius] and deny the deity of
Christ [and thus the Trinity].
How should I respond? Let me just say that I am a
Trinitarian who believes in the deity of Christ- Christ is fully God and fully
man. The J.W. pamphlet made a good defense for their view- and they were not
totally ‘deceptive’ in their argument. But they did quote lots of bible verses
that kind of backed up their side- and they quoted some from Isaiah. But they
left out chapter 9.
The famous passage that says Jesus is the ‘Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace’ very strong language indeed.
What about the argument that the early Catholic bishops
polluted the true teachings of Jesus by introducing Greek thought into Jesus
true teachings? It is true that Greek philosophy had a belief that there was a
pre existing principle of wisdom- a ‘divine logos’ if you will.
The only problem with the argument that the Catholic bishops
were the culprits who introduced Logos Christology into the doctrines of the
church is that the New Testament itself has ‘Logos Christology’ in it. What is
Logos Christology?
Logos is the Greek word for ‘Word’. Christology is the study
of Christ. Logos Christology is the description of Jesus found in the writings
of the apostle John that describe Jesus as the Eternal Word of God.
John wrote the gospel of John, the 3 letters- 1st,
2nd and 3rd John- and the book of Revelation [some scholar’s dispute
that John authored the last one]. In these writings Jesus is called the Word of
God- he is described as the Word that was ‘with God, and was God’ [John 1].
So the bible itself has Greek influences- because it was
written in Greek! And even though the pre Christian philosophers had a concept
of a personified wisdom [the Jews also- read Proverbs 8] yet the New Testament
also speaks of Jesus as this Eternal Word of God who was indeed ‘true God from
true God’.
So I think the talk I had was good- I understand that many
groups of people have had difficulty with the doctrine of the Trinity and the
accusation that Constantine and the Catholics ‘hijacked’ the true religion of
Jesus has been made by many groups over the years. Yet at the end of the day
the doctrine of Jesus being God is clearly found in the bible [and yes, even in
the Old Testament] and we as Orthodox Christians confess Jesus as God- not because of the Greeks- or the Catholics-
or because of any other influence that ‘snuck in’ we confess him as God because
‘the bible tells me so’ Amen and Amen.
[1655] A WAKE UP CALL TO THE PROFESSOR-
There are a lot of
things I want to hit on today- let me start with an article I read in the paper
yesterday. It was a study that compared students who studied physics using 2
different methods. The traditional lecture room environment- taught by veteran
teachers. Versus an interactive classroom environment taught by inexperienced
students [no teacher] who simply shared the things they were learning with each
other.
To the shock of the traditional advocates- the kids who were
taught without a teacher scored twice as high on the tests as those who sat in
the classroom. The study was headed up by a top rated scientist who works for
the president.
This reminded me of all the teaching I did over the years on
the nature of the church [the study on the blog is called ‘what in the world is
the church’]. After years of studying and doing many of the ‘interactive’
principles found in the study- I do see how important it is for believers to
interact with each other- not just during ‘fellowship’ times- but as a main
part of worship.
It is no accident that the churches in the New Testament
were structured along these lines. In the bible you simply did not have
churches structured around a single figure who ‘lectured’ week after week to
the people. Now- this debate has been raging for a while amongst those who
debate stuff like this. And a few years back some scholars from the more
traditional view really went after the more ‘organic’ type church brothers.
But overall I believe the interactive ‘church meeting’ is
really the most biblical way to go. I still think there is room for the more
traditional style of ‘lecture hall’ but that is a small part of being in
Christian community- yet for many that seems to actually be what they refer to
as ‘the local church’ very limited perspective indeed [you can also read my
short book on the left of the blog site- Further Talks on Church and Ministry].
Okay- maybe I’ll hit a few more thoughts in keeping with
this idea. After the fellowship lunch the other day I invited Henry [my
homeless friend] back to the house for the day. These guys are on the streets
most of the day and they appreciate being able to rest and catch some news on
the tube.
Once again as Henry left he told me ‘John- this was one of
the best days I have had in a long time’. He told me this the last time I had
him over. Why? What I do with Henry is I try not to act the ‘preacher/pastor’
role. That is I share and interact with Henry as an equal. Henry just so
happens to be real knowledgeable when it comes to the bible and theology.
Part of the discussion was Henry sharing how the letter to
the Romans [written by the apostle Paul] was the only letter written to a
church that Paul did not found himself. Now- I knew this before- and most bible
students know this- but yet it started a conversation that both of us could
engage in. Henry had read somewhere that the church at Rome might have been
started by the Diaspora [the scattered] Jews/Christians who dispersed after the
Martyrdom of Stephen in Acts chapter 7.
I told Henry that I actually taught on this before- but I
referenced the dispersion that took place in Acts chapter 2. At the day of
Pentecost there were Jewish worshippers who came from all parts of the known
world at the time- they were gathered at Jerusalem for the big holiday.
After the Spirit came on the early church- these believers
went back to their homes and some of them did indeed go back to Rome.
Either way- the point is that Paul did not start the church
at Rome- and there are no records [in the bible] of who was the first founder
[yes Peter also went to Rome- but he too was not the initial 'church planter’].
Okay- why even mention this? I think Henry has these ‘best
days of my life’ days because the fellowships we have are based on the organic
church style- that is I’m not always ‘preaching’ to him in the conventional
sense.
I hope to get with the guys again this week- same place
[Sirloin Stockade off of SPID in Corpus] I will let everyone know a day ahead-
so if you guys want to make it a weekly thing you can join the group. But I
have been meeting with these friends for 20 years now- just sharing the
interactive way.
The above study was said to have been a real wake up call to
the actual veteran lecturers- they couldn’t believe that the students on their
own- without the ‘pro’ lecturing them- would do twice as well as the students
who sat ‘in church’ [the lecture room] simply listening to the able speaker-
speak.
The apostle Paul knew this trick 2 millennia ago- he wrote
the church at Corinth ‘and when you meet together- let everyone of you share
what you have learned- do it in order- but let everyone speak’ I like Paul’s
method a lot.
[1654] OPEN THE BOOK AND BREAK THE SEALS
We had a good fellowship the other day- I and 2 homeless
bro’s got with 2 Kingsville originals and we
all ate at the Sirloin Stockade. I want to try and meet once a week for
lunch in Corpus- everybody is welcome by the way. I’ll try and mention it on
the sites [Blog, Facebook] a day ahead of time, and you are all invited.
I will only cover the cost of the homeless guys though-
everyone else it’s Dutch. Okay- this week I have been reading revelation
chapter 5. We see this image of John the apostle standing in the throne room of
God and God has this book in his hand. John is upset because no one is able to
open the book and loose the seals. As John is upset, one of the elders comes up
to him and tells him not to worry- Jesus- the Lion of the tribe of Judah, he
has prevailed to open the book and to break the seals.
The vision is you have these elders and beasts and John and
a multitude of angels and people from all nations- it’s a great gathering of
saints of the most high- a true picture of the people of God.
I applied the vision to our little fellowship- made up of
people from all over- different ethnic backgrounds and cultures. And John the
apostle is struggling with this mandate to get the message out. Remember- the
book of Revelation begins with Jesus telling John ‘write these letters to the 7
churches’ so John has this task to communicate this message from God. Yet he
runs up against the classic roadblock ‘Who is worthy’ in so many words ‘why did
you pick me for the job- I’m not able to do it’. You hear the words of Isaiah
here- Isaiah said ‘I am a man of unclean lips- in the middle of a bunch of
unclean people!’ Geez Isaiah- you’re not only too hard on yourself, but
everyone else!
In the Isaiah vision God takes a coal and uses it to cleanse
the lips of the prophet. So John is distraught over the fact that this book is
sealed- and no matter how hard he tries- he cant open the thing. Jesus steps up
to the plate and takes it and opens it. The whole community rejoices- they sing
this song- a new song ‘Worthy is the lamb to open the book and to loose the
seals thereof, for thou wast slain and hast redeemed us unto God by thy Blood
out of every kindred and tribe and tongue and nation- and hast made us priests
and kings unto God our father’. Yes, I put this verse to memory this week and
sang it all thru out the week.
Sure- my wife said ‘who are you talking to’. I just blew it
off- I have been talking to myself for years. So I’m identifying somewhat with
John- also struggling to ‘open the book and loose the seals’. These last few
weeks I dropped our radio program and was in a mad rush to get the shows on
line [there on now]. But I dropped on a Friday and wanted to have them up by
that Sunday.
So after ordering some equipment on line [stuff to convert
tape to computer drive] and having my daughter teach me a few computer things
[I am computer illiterate- really. Just looking at HTML/JavaScript is like
reading a foreign language!]. But even though I was ‘unworthy to open the book
and loose the seals’ somehow by Gods grace we were up and running by Sunday.
So as I’m praying/singing the ‘new song’- kind of an
intercessory thing- believing God to help us get the word out. Sure enough I
sing the thing and the bell rings. That was my buddy Emit [last post] and from
that surprise visit a few doors opened to get together more often with the
brothers.
Of course I’m just applying these things- obviously
revelation is not about eating at the big cow! But God does use stuff like this
to speak to us- the principle of Jesus alone being the one who is worthy to
‘open the book’ well that’s a truism that will always be there.
Down the road I hope to teach a little more on the book of
Revelation. It’s really not as hard as it might look. Basically you have the
command of Jesus to John to write the 7 letters. John sees Jesus as the one who
will assist him in getting the message out. The book had 7 seals. The opening
of the last seal releases 7 trumpets. And the last trumpet leads to 7 bowls
[vials]. Then you have the last few chapters that speak about the wrapping up
of the kingdom and the resurrection and the final judgment. You end with a new
heaven and a new earth and whoever wants ‘let him come and drink of the water
of life’. That’s really it- sure you do have a lot of numbers and images and
stuff- but overall this is the basic outline of the book.
In the book of Daniel he sees a lot of the same things that
John sees in the book of Revelation- but Daniel is told to seal up the vision-
for the time was not ready. John is told to ‘un seal’ it- the time is at hand.
For many of the new friends that came in this last year- the time was ready for
you guys to ‘read the book’ so to speak. Just remember the key- only Jesus has
the ability to show you what’s in the book- to make it clear. Read and pray and
ask God to help you understand- he alone can do it.
[1653] A SURPRISE VISIT
I had a surprise visit last night- one of my original
‘church members’ stopped by to see me. Emit was the 2nd generation
family, a son of one of the guys who was hooked on Heroin in the early days.
Emit’s dad [Emit senior] was also part of the first group of members.
I would hold bible studies for the guys in the county jail-
some were waiting for their court dates- they would do lots of time in Texas’
famous prison system- others were just doing time for minor offenses- things
related to their drug addictions.
So anyway Emit Jr. was in that first group. I would pick up
his dad for our church meetings [first held at an old abandoned hospital- later
moved to my garage]. We had around 30 or so people who made up our little
group. Mostly families of the guys I met thru the jail meetings. But every so
often we had someone hear about us and they would join our group.
I remember Roy and Kathy- they were in this group of ‘normal
people’. Roy was a liberal news reporter for the local paper- and Kathy was a
bible college graduate. I don’t know how they found us- but they liked the
bible studies I would do and they became good friends. The same with Hubert and
his wife Katy.
Hubert actually taught at a regional bible school [Pan Am
school/church] sponsored by the Presbyterian Church. It was their Latin
American outreach school- located in Kingsville. So we had some up-standing
folk as well. As I was fellowshipping with Emit we had some good laughs. I told
him now that I’m posting the radio shows on the blog that in the future I’m
going to post some of the old recordings from the early days. You can hear
Emits dad on these tapes.
It was funny- the guys acted like we were just hanging out
at my house- even during the church meetings! Emit [Sr.] had a habit of raiding
my fridge right before the meetings would start- I mean I couldn’t keep Pecan
Pies away from the brother. I eventually hid the good stuff before Emit got
there. Hey I loved the bro. but the Pecan Pies were not part of the deal!
Emit told me he still has a few of these tapes and he hears
his dads voice on some of them- His dad has been dead for many years now. He
was clean at the time- but he ruined his liver with the Heroin and it finally
caught up with him. His dad met his
wife- Janie- at our little church. Janie was a single mom who had a bunch of
boys- I worked with her sons and she would attend the church- Emit met Janie
and sure enough they got married. They were a nice couple.
So last night Emit calls some of the other original group
[geez- he had all their numbers in his phone]. So in a few hours I will be
taking Emit, David [Buentello] and Henry [one of the homeless guys] to lunch in
Corpus. David and Emit both work in Corpus now- they still live in Kingsville.
David too was a ‘founding member’ I met his dad while
preaching at the jail- Leonard was a long time addict. Once again I met the
sons thru my friendship with the dad. David has a bunch of brothers and I met
Leonard [Jr.] and Ben and a few others. David spent lots of year strung out on
drugs. I must have written Dave a few hundred times over the years when he was
in prison- I saw this as a ministry- keeping in touch with the brothers as they
did time- lots of time- in prison. David
got his degree [he started while in prison and finished after he got out. It’s
a program that helps the guys get a degree with aid from the state. Texas just
ended the program this year; they said ‘why should we be paying for ex con’s
education for free’. As someone who has seen the good results- it really was
worth it].
David has been clean for many years and he is a professional
counselor working in Corpus Christi. One time I asked David to pick up the guys
for our meetings the next day. Many times I was working the night before at the
fire house and it helped if someone could pick the people up in the morning- it
gave me a little more time to prepare for the meeting. So I gave Dave the
Suburban and he had it for the night. I knew it was a risk- not that he would
steal the darn thing- but be tempted to score drugs and all.
Sure enough Dave came by the fire station early in the
morning- he was fessing up- telling me he blew it and he was gonna leave the
truck. I told him just because he had a bad night- I still needed him to finish
the task and pull through. He did- he picked everyone up and attended the
service.
Lots of times the guys in these situations have never had
any home structure- I mean their parents love them and all- but when the dad
struggles with addiction- they’re not there to support the sons. So this was
training in a way for Dave.
So hopefully they will all find the restaurant [it’s right
off the main drag- but I’m not sure they know the spot I was telling them]. It
was funny- as Emit was leaving I walked him out to the car. He was wearing
these coveralls from the auto dealer that he works for- he has this lawnmower
sticking halfway out of the trunk [he was cutting yards for money after work].
And I asked him about his new girlfriend and all [Emit was married years ago to
another person whose family were church members of our group. His wife,
Veronica, had a few boys and one girl with Emit. They eventually divorced. One
time at work we had a call for a stabbing- the person who was stabbed- Junior
Perez- was another family member who I met from the jails. Junior’s younger
brother- Tony- was a faithful church member. His older brother- Daniel- was the
one I met thru the jail. Junior was dating Veronica at the time- it was an
abusive relationship- she stabbed Junior while he was trying to get into her
house. She lived there with her mom- Yolanda- yes another one of our church
members. She killed Junior that night- no charges against her- but she would
eventfully move out of town]
So as Emits leaving I ask him about his latest girl- he says
she a nice person- but its one of those situations where the family doesn’t
know she’s dating him [I don’t know why- just some family thing]. Then I asked
him what happened with his other girl friend- the one he dated for years ‘Oh
her, they took her away from me’ [now- I know what Emit meant- her family
didn’t get along with Emit and they eventually convinced her to leave Emit].
Now, even though I knew what Emit meant- I was like ‘Hey bro. you show up with
these work coveralls- the type you usually see on these serial killer types-
you know the video of some guy kidnapping someone at the local store- and you
have this ‘after hours lawnmower job’ [classic cover up for stuffing things in
the trunk] and you tell me the current girl friend’s family- well they don’t
know about your ‘relationship’ and the last one- well ‘they took her away’ [I
mean who is they- the cops! LOL]. I said if I didn’t know any better it looks
like you might have spent the last 10 years as a serial killer’!
He got a kick out of that. Okay enough for now- maybe I’ll
let you know how the fellowship went tomorrow. Emit told me his youngest boy-
Justin- is a full blow Heroin addict in Robstown. Geez- I just took a ride thru
there the other week- felt like God wanted me to simply do a prayer drive. And
now we are going to visit Justin in a few days- maybe it was a sign. Okay-
please pray for my buddies and their
families.
I’m glad they’re still hanging in there- but I need to try
and get with them more often- hopefully today we can schedule a few more
fellowship meetings- it’s been too long.
[NOTE- Dave- if you
read this- just leave a quick comment on Facebook- so my friends from Jersey
can see who you are- I have lots of old friends on the site- thanks]
P.S.- As Emit was
giving me all the updated phone numbers of the brothers- I was writing them
down in my address book/organizer- geez- as I turned to the ‘E’ page and the
‘D’ page and all- I still had the original names and numbers of their dads and
all. One entry said 'Emit/Janie’ it brought back lots of memories.
[1652] LETTER FROM AN OLD FRIEND
The other day I mentioned how over the years I have come to
‘see’ the community of people that I speak into- those friends I have worked
with on the streets and all the readers/hearers of the ministry- I have come to
see them as one community. I even began to see the friends who died as still
being part of the community- just because they are not physically present- they
are still ‘there’.
In the letter to the Hebrews the bible says Jesus stands in
the middle of the congregation and sings praises unto God. On the Mount of
Transfiguration Jesus met with Moses and Elijah [2 dead saints] and Peter,
James and John. The community was made up of both earthly and heavenly saints.
Okay- said all that to say this. When I first came to Texas
I drove down with a good buddy I grew up with. His name was Miguel and we hung
out as kids. Eventually Miguel would give his life to God [after me working
with him for a few months] and I saw him as one of my 1st converts
to the Lord.
I gave Miguel my first bible and got another one. Over a few
years me and Mike tried to establish ourselves and our young families on this
strange Texas frontier. Eventually Mike went back to Jersey. The night before
he left [I drove him to the airport in San Antonio the next day- and his
family]. We took a drive to Corpus Christi [where I now live- we both lived in
Kingsville at the time- about 40 miles from Corpus] and spent the last night as
buddies just hanging out on Padre Island- eating Whataburger’s [a great burger
restaurant in Tx.] and just talking about what God had in store for the future.
Actually, as I sit here and type I’m about 100 yards from the main road going
straight to the Island- the same road we drove on 25 years ago.
As the years passed I would get a call from my old buddy
every so often. One time Mike called to give me the news ‘John- I wanted to let
you know I tested positive for Aids’- What! How’d that happen? [Probably a bad
response now that I think about it]. Mike wasn’t ‘gay’ or bisexual- but he had
lots of girlfriends- all the time. Back then safe sex was more of an option-
and obviously Mike wasn’t too careful. Mike told me his wife- Lu Ann- also
tested positive. What a tragedy- they had 4 boys.
So of course the whole family became a regular prayer
request- till this day- every morning [every!] I pray for Mikes boys. One time
I came home from work and my wife said ‘John- Lu Ann called’ I said ‘Mike died’
she said yes. Mike was 32. One day I received a letter from Lu Ann- she told me
how her oldest boy was a preacher now in N.J. and he was on fire for God. She
wrote a nice long letter. It must have been something God wanted her to do- I
will forever remember that letter.
When Mike left Texas- I got that old bible I gave him back.
It was just a sentimental thing of keeping your 1st bible. Then one
year I started reading from it again and found that Mike had sprinkled notes
all thru out it- things like ‘ask John this’ and stuff like that. So it was
cool to catch these short notes every so often. I could almost hear Mikes voice
as I read the notes.
So anyway as I pray in the mornings I have a conscious sense
of my old buddies who have died- lots of homeless friends- a few ex- con/addict
friends- and of course Mike and Lou Ann- [I guess she’s dead by now?] So last
week as I’m just asking the Lord what chapter to read. I turn to Exodus 16- and
Mike had a bunch of notes on this page- stuff like ‘NOTICE THIS’ and things
that were weird- like he was writing notes to me. It did freak me out- I
‘fellowship’ with Mike when I pray for the Bro’s- and sometimes it’s like Mike
is saying ‘John- thanks for praying for the boys’. And then to read notes later
that say ‘Notice this’ or ‘ask John this’ it’s freaky.
Okay- that chapter dealt with God giving his people Manna-
bread from heaven. It was the same week I dropped the radio program- I felt bad
about doing it- but it was time. I told the Lord ‘If I messed up- sorry’. That
is if I dropped it cause I was mad they kept losing the ‘darn’ tapes- then I
repent. So anyway one of the verses in the chapter says ‘some people went out
on the 7th day- to get their daily bread- and they found none’.
I knew there were going to be lots of long time listeners-
who have written- who loved the show. These would ‘go out’ on the 7th
day [Actually Sunday is the 1st day- but you get the idea] and would
find ‘no bread’ for the first time in 15
years of broadcasting over KCTA. Actually over these last few days I
have had lots of confirmation that this was the way to go- I began putting the
shows on my blog- you can now listen and download the stuff 24/7- as opposed to
only being able to hear it once a week. At the broadcast rate- geez it took 5
years just to recycle some of the older messages.
So for today- we learned that those who have gone on- our
spiritual brothers and sisters- they are ‘still alive’. Now the bible forbids
communication with the dead, and there are lots of religious superstitions that
cross the line in these areas- but at the same time we do believe in eternal
life- and if God speaks to me thru the words of one of my old buddies- stuff
like ‘notice this’ then who am I to not notice?
[1646] I AM THE RESURRECTION AND THE LIFE-
The other night I had
a weird dream- 2 young guys showed up at my door. They rang the bell and as I
opened the door one of the boys said ‘John, do you remember me’. Now- to be
honest this has happened lots thru out my life. At the Fire House I would often
show up for shift in the morning and the off going shift would say ‘John- one
of your convict buddies stopped by yesterday’ [they eventually caught on that
lots of the guys I worked with at the jail/prisons knew where they could find
me when they got out- and they figured they would catch me at the Fire House].
So stuff like this has happened lots- and there are times
when I simply don’t remember who the guy’s are- if you give a bible study 5
years previously- they might remember you- but you might not remember them. So
in my dream I told the kid [around 19 years old] ‘to be honest I don’t really
remember you- just a little’ [Yes- I admit at times I have said ‘yeah- I think’
just so I wouldn’t offend the brothers].
The boy tells me that I did indeed help him and he won’t
forget it. So I fellowshipped a little while. Then the boy asks a strange
request ‘John- will you draw me a picture’. Sure- it seemed like something a
young boy would ask- but why not. So I drew a picture of the beach and us just
sitting there- like Father and son- and he asked me to sign it for him. I gave
him the simple request and he seemed like a little boy getting a present from
his dad. He talked a little more and as he began to leave he told me his name.
He said ‘I’m Texas Ruiz’. And he left.
As I woke up [around 3 a.m.] I didn’t think too much about
it. As I started the coffee, getting ready to go in the yard to pray. I
remembered who Texas Ruiz was. I mentioned a few weeks ago that I pray for the
cases I see in the paper- or on the news- the severe cases of crimes that have
been committed. I have a wall of names [around 30 or so] that I paint the names
of these people on. They will forever be on my prayer list- so I try and pick
cases where the criminal [or victim] has a long lasting result/penalty- so as I
pray for them over the years they can benefit from it.
One of the cases was a local one- here in Corpus Christi.
The stepdad called 911 and his stepson [around 1 year old] had died. At 1st
they thought it was from some natural cause- then they found out the step dad
abused the boy and he died from this abuse. I saw the boy on T.V. a lot- being
it was local. As Protestants we usually don’t pray for the people who have
died- but I actually have felt the Lord challenge me about this over these last
few years- and I do pray for the victims sometimes, even though they are dead.
When I saw the boy on TV I would just raise my hand towards him and pray that
God would be with his soul- I felt real bad for the kid. I did this a few times
over about a week. I felt like a ‘dad’ to the kid- just praying for him. The
boys name was Texas Ruiz.
There is a verse in Ezekiel 37- God says ‘in the day I raise
you up and bring you back from the dead- in that day you will know that I am
God’. I wrote this verse down on an ongoing journal type thing- every week I
add whatever verse/book I’m studying from- whatever I feel might be
significant. So I stuck this verse on the top of the page. A few days went by
and I wrote the dream on the same page- I felt it was significant so I wrote it
down.
After a few days- while reviewing the page- I saw that on
the top it said ‘in the day I bring you back from the grave’ and in the dream-
yes one of ‘our people’ did come back- it freaked me out.
In John’s gospel, chapter 11, we read of the story of Jesus
raising Lazarus from the dead. Lazarus and his sisters- Martha and Mary- are
good friends of Jesus. They lived in a little town named Bethany [the name of
my oldest daughter] and for the Jewish people to openly embrace Jesus at the
time- it was a sacrifice. Many of the religious leaders already had turned
against Jesus.
So one day Lazarus gets real sick and the sisters send word
to Jesus ‘Lazarus- your friend- is sick’. Now- Jesus is going all over the
place- healing sick people- opening blind eyes- multiplying bread and fish. I
mean the sisters must have thought ‘well- at least all the flack we’ve taken
over openly befriending Jesus will finally pay off’. But when Jesus hears about
Lazarus the bible says he purposefully waited 2 extra days before heading
towards Bethany.
Now- after a few days Lazarus did indeed die. The sisters
are mad- ‘wow- he healed all these others- strangers- yet no time for us’. When
he gets to the outskirts of town Martha goes out to see him ‘Jesus- why didn’t
you come? You could have prevented this from happening’. Eventually Mary says
the same thing to him. Jesus tells them ‘I am the resurrection and the life’.
The sisters only saw Jesus thru the lens of ‘why didn't you
fix the problem when it was still possible’ Jesus was saying ‘it’s still
possible’. He was telling them ‘Just because the thing you thought I would do-
in life- didn’t happen yet- I can still overcome the devastation that it has
caused you’. Jesus of course will raise their brother- it becomes a huge
miracle to the point where the religious leaders conspire to kill Lazarus too-
because so many Jewish people begin believing in Jesus because of this miracle.
In Ezekiel 37 God told Ezekiel [and the nation of Israel]
‘in the day I bring you back from the dead- in that day you will know I am
God’. Today we celebrate the resurrection of Jesus. A real event that took
place in time and has stood the test of historical examination [too much to
cover right now- but take my word for it- the evidence is overwhelming].
Sometimes we are like the sisters of Lazarus- we expected
God to prevent the disaster from happening ‘Lord- if you were here this would
not have happened’. The test of faith is to continue to believe- even on the
other side of the disaster. The problem with Mary and Martha was they felt like
Jesus simply did not come thru in time- they heard all these great stories
about how Jesus helped all these others- yet they sat at home- with a dead
brother and a funeral to attend.
Today I want to challenge you- are you like the sisters? Did
God not prevent the disaster from happening? Did he not do for you what he did
for the others? You might not see the ultimate ‘healing’ until the
resurrection- the ‘last day’- but be assured- in the day he raises you from the
dead- you will know that he is God.
[1645] THE CHINGALINGS-
Got an email the other day from one of my old buddies who I
haven’t heard from in a few years. He must have googled my name and found the
blog site- it’s not hard to find me being my name is on a lot of the posts that
I publish.
He was surprised to have heard that I retired; he used to
call me up a lot over the years when I was at the fire house. We grew up
together in N.J. and he was one of the friends I always kept in touch with. He
told me that a mutual friend was still in prison [Rahway, N.J.] I told him
‘yeah- I know’ I have been writing him in prison ever since he first told me
about it a few years back.
He finally sent me the ‘rap sheet’ I knew our friend was
doing time for a serious offense, just never knew the whole story. As I read
the link I pictured in my mind the whole scene. They pulled up to some house on
70 something street- late at night. The owner was a 73 year old salvage yard
owner. My friend had done business with him being he too owned a trucking
business. As my friend waited in the Getaway car- his cousin [who I also knew] and
another guy go upstairs and knock on the door- he answers ‘who is it’ they
reply ‘PSG & E’ [I guess the name of the utility co. in Jersey- I grew up
in Jersey but never paid a utility bill]. The guy says ‘one minute’ and as ‘he’
unlocks the door they rush in- to find the cops waiting in the apt. They were
set up.
The case showed how they had plastic restraints and duct
tape and all the stuff you would need to kidnap someone. They basically were
there to rob the guy- he supposedly had a safe with lots of money in it-
instead they got busted. As I read the case- the wife’s testimony [I knew her
since I was a kid too- they were together since ‘way back then’] I could hear
her voice- reading my friends testimony- the story he came up with- I knew I
was hearing my friend. It was sad- yet I felt like I was there.
One time this friend stopped by my house in Jersey ‘hey
John- let’s take a ride to the shore’. Sure- where did you get the car? [Nice
new Nova] ‘I found it- it was just sitting there with the keys in it’ sure
enough I went. We had a few incidents take place where he owed me some money-
one night I was at the carnival with another friend and I said ‘if I see so and
so tonight- its over!’
Sure enough my friend spots him a little while later and I
got into a severe fight with him. The next day I found out he had to go to the
hospital and his family pressed charges against me- and his ‘biker friends’
[from Fort Lee- young guys- all our age] were gonna get me. I joined the Navy a
few days later.
Over the years I always tried to ‘convert’ my buddies- the
first time back after this incident [maybe a couple of years later?] I hooked
up with these old friends- my one friend [geez- I don’t want to use their
names] the friend that I didn’t get in the fight with- he said ‘John- so and so
still holds a grudge, maybe you better not get in touch with him’ I just blew
it off- we got together and nothing happened. I felt bad- he did have some
scars from the incident a few years earlier.
I have always tried to stay in touch with these old friends-
I have made lots of friends thru the years- guys who have gone to prison-
involved in bad stuff- yet lots of them do actually get into the bible- seek
God- and many of them do come around.
I have always had sincere friends say ‘John- maybe your
taking too many risks by being around these guys’. I have had a few good
friends tell me this recently about my friends contact with these Muslim groups
on facebook ‘John- you never know if these guys are terrorists or what’ I hear
them- yet the ‘risk’ of possibly having a ‘secret’ terrorist friend on the net-
well that’s really not something I worry about- plus- these guys do read my
posts, what more could I ask for?
I haven’t heard from my friend in prison for around 8 months
now- he was real happy to write- he asked for some radio tapes from my
programs- I sent him a bunch- he was grateful- shared them with the brothers in
jail [the way my buddy was- always scamming someone- I wouldn’t put it past him
to have sold the tapes!]. The charges against him were attempted kidnapping and
robbery. They caught him because the plan was hatched with a biker gang out of
the South Bronx [N.Y.] and they had an undercover informant in the gang. The
gang are called the Chingalings, I saw an A&E special on them years ago-
never knew my friend [or his cousin] were in the gang.
So anyway hopefully I’ll hear from him again- I saved the
address [I used to never save the addresses of my friends who I wrote to in
prison- I have been writing the brothers for years- teaching them stuff- one on
one, like the blog- but I would simply get the address from the next letter-
this time I thought I should save one of the envelopes- so sure enough I have
his Rahway address- his prison number and all].
One time I got an email from a friend- a girl I grew up
with- she read the blog and said something like ‘gee- I like the blog John- and
I know you are always challenging us to go out and help people like you do- but
I’m not like you- I can’t get with all these convicts’. I emailed her back
‘PLEASE- DON’T GET WITH CONVICTS!’ I had to explain to her that she shouldn’t
take my blog challenges the wrong way- I never meant for the average homemaker
to go out and meet with the Chingalings!
Yet I do try and challenge my old buddies- guys who have
done time in prison- ex drug addicts and all- I do often tell them ‘hey guys-
don’t forget where you came from- there are still others like you that need
someone to go and take a chance on them- like I did with you’. All in all I’m
sure God’s will will get done. Anyway it was good to hear from one of my old
buddies- he’s not on Facebook- I searched for him when I first got on- I told
him that would be the best place to keep in touch. Either way it’s important to
make an effort- even if its small- to try and help out your friends- you might
have to take some risks- but in the end it will be worth it.
[1642] LESSON FROM A MUSLIM-
I read a story in my local paper yesterday- there was an
ecumenical dinner held this week between Christians, Jews and Muslims. The
Christian staff writer who attended shared how it helped her to overcome previous
prejudices that she had. She told what the various speakers discussed and I was
particularly impressed with what the Muslim speaker said- she talked about how
true religion is not performance, putting on a show- but is expressed in
reaching out to those in need- the poor and hurting.
In fact she was basically quoting the New Testament book of
James- James says ‘pure religion is to visit the fatherless and widows and to
stay clean from the world’. A few weeks back one of my homeless buddies stopped
by- he’s basically a genius when it comes to the bible- I mean it’s sort of an
autistic thing to be honest- he knows- by memory- much more than the average
preacher. As I visited with Henry I gave him the latest bible studies that were
sent to me over the last few months. Years ago I heard a N.J. Jewish preacher-
who pastors a Messianic congregation in Lodi, N.J.- he had a short radio show
on the same station I’m on- and as a courtesy I sent him some of my books and
told him hi and all- being I’m a former Jersey brother and all. Ever since he
has sent me these really great bible studies every month.
The studies are really in depth- and he usually only sends
them to partners [those who support his ministry with money]. But I guess he
appreciated my sending him a nice note and he forever put me on the list. Now-
I’m an avid reader- I’ve read just about everything you can get your hands on-
but these past few years I’m trying to stick with scholarly stuff- not that I’m
‘too good’ for the basic stuff- It’s just I really don’t have the time to just
read tons of stuff that’s in the category of ‘devotional’ material- stuff that
just kind of talks about Christian things.
So I hate to throw the stuff out- I mean they’re great bible
studies. I don’t want to write Jonathan [the pastor] and say ‘take me off your
list’- so I save them up and give them to Henry- he devours them and even
quotes them back to me the next time I see him. So anyway we had a good talk.
Somehow we got into discussing the book of James [the verse I quoted above] and
I told Henry how it’s funny that James [we believe this letter in the New
Testament- called James- was written by the James who was Jesus’ brother-
mentioned about in the bible. He was the same James mentioned as one of the
leaders in the church at Jerusalem in the book of Acts, chapter 15. To my
Catholic friends- it might sound strange ‘Jesus had a brother?’ these words are
found in the New Testament. Catholic teachers don’t deny this- they just
interpret it to mean ‘cousin’ or near relative- some say its speaking of
‘Christian brother’. Don’t want to debate it- just thought I should mention
it].
Anyway- I told Henry how it’s strange that one of the key
leaders in the early church- who was closer to Jesus than all the other
disciples [he lived in the same house] that he would write such a scathing
indictment against the rich- and he would defend the poor so strongly. James’
letter is one of the strongest rebukes against the rich that you will find in
the bible. Anyway Henry agreed with me- of course Henry’s poor- homeless- but
he knows his stuff. He said ‘you know John- as true as you are- you never hear
this from the famous pulpits in America’. He was agreeing with what the Muslim
lady said at the dinner- that true religion is not fame and glory- but serving
those in need.
I liked the spirit of the article I read- It does not mean I
will not continue to advocate for the exclusivity of the gospel of Jesus- that
Jesus is truly the only way to God. Pope Benedict has also come under some heat
for saying the Catholic Church teaches that Jesus is the only way of salvation-
to which I agree.
Yet at the same time- as we make our case to our Muslim and
Jewish friends- we can also sit down with them- live as citizens of the same
community with them- and even learn something from them every now and then.
NOTE- To any of my friends who might be ‘rich’. The early
church did have certain individuals who were rich- and it was oaky. The person
who gave his grave spot to Jesus- Joseph of Arimathea- was rich. Also in the
books of Acts there were believers who sold their real estate and dedicated the
money to the church. So the bible doesn’t just outright condemn those who are
rich- but there are many warnings against being rich in ‘this world’ while
forgetting to build riches in the kingdom [works of love and charity]. That’s
the main theme of James’ letter.
[1576] CHRIS MATTHEWS, ED SHULTZ AND THE HOMELESS- Spent the
day yesterday on the streets with my homeless buddies- it was cold! I was on
foot. Ran into Henry, one of the brothers who really knows his stuff. Henry is
originally from Massachusetts and he always has great discussions about the
bible- he’s sort of one of those undiscovered genius types- a ‘rain man’ type
guy when it comes to the bible. We came back to the house for the afternoon-
made a little lunch/dinner type thing. A few months back another one of my
buddies, John David [I wrote about John a while back- he was strung out on
cocaine for years- has been clean for a while] came by- he started a drug
rehab- told me the location and showed me the story they ran on him in the news
[it made it to CNN!] I was excited- the next day I wrote a 50 dollar check-
stuck it in my wallet and figured the next time I run into him I’ll give it to
him as a gift. Never ran into him since- so I gave the check to Henry- he will
get with brother Ray- a street preacher who is also struggling with finances
right now- and they will split it. Henry would never be able to cash it by
himself- or else I would have just given him the 50. I Heard Roger might have
died in jail- about a year ago he threatened to kill a cop [he’s all talk-
never would have done it] and they charged him with a terroristic threat- sent
him away for a year. Roger was a good friend- hope he didn’t die. Around 4
o’clock Henry was heading out to go down the road to brother Rays place [lives
a mile or 2 away] I gave Henry a bunch of bible studies that some ministry
sends me every month- I don’t have time to read them- hate to throw them away-
so I save them for Henry, he loves them. The preacher is from New Jersey- a
Messianic Jew- I sent him some stuff once and just said hi- he has been sending
me the studies ever since. As Henry was walking out- he had the check- a little
doggie bag I whipped up for him with some stuff- the studies and all- he told
me ‘John- this has been the best day I have had in a long time’ I knew it
wasn’t the check- or food- Henry sees me as one of his best friends- and he
really gets into the fellowship time- I usually share some ‘scholarly’ stuff I’ve been reading- the trends going on in
theology and all- he eats that stuff up- loves learning- but doesn’t always
have up to date info on the recent developments in the field of theology- so he
just likes learning.
Okay- though I hate to do this- let me make a few more
political/news comments. After Henry left I caught the news for a few hours-
Chris Matthews has chosen to use the deaths of the innocent victims in Arizona
for political gain. He went on a rampage of saying because of this Sarah Palin
needs to come out and apologize for using political targets to target
Democratic districts- he said she will forever be associated with the deaths-
that you will be able to Google Palin and crosshairs and she will be marked for
life with the deaths of these people- and he said she will be ‘ERASED’ [no lie]
if she doesn’t apologize. This man is more dangerous than Glenn Beck- most
people see Beck for what he is- Matthews is not seen as a ‘nut job’ it is very
possible to take his words to mean he is calling for the assassination of Sarah
Palin- so very sad. Then Ed Shultz [another guy I do like] did his show
defending his segment ‘psycho talk’ I missed the beginning of the show- but you
got the drift that some on the conservative side have shot back at the liberals
and said ‘look- you lib’s use radical talk too’ so Ed was defending his
segment- than- to my shock- he transitions to a segment called RAPI- FIRE [God-
please help us all] and as he asks the 2 democratic guests their views on the
irresponsibility of Palin and the right using images of guns and crosshairs and
targets- the 2 guests seem embarrassed that the name of this segment is called
RAPID- FIRE with the words ‘rapid fire’ blazed in red and blinking on the
bottom of the screen- I mean Shultz comes on MSNBC right after Matthews- who
just called for Palin to be ‘ERASED’. I couldn’t believe the stupidity of these
men- to put it bluntly. At this point it looks like the shooter was just a
mentally disturbed young man who had no consistent political views- yes- in the
beginning it seemed like he might have been a right wing nut job- a Tim McVeigh
type personality- but the evidence just does not show that. Of course what he
did is still horrendous- it just doesn’t seem to have been instigated by right
wing ideology. It just seems hypocritical- of course the right wingers are
going to show you all the examples of the left doing the same things that they
are outraged over- so another ‘target’ was revealed- it was made by the
Democrats- and it had exactly the same rifle/scope targets over the districts
of Republicans- then they of course showed you the clips of Obama saying ‘when
they bring a knife [political opponents] we bring a gun’ and I even caught this
one my self- when the president made the end of the year deal with the
republicans- the lame duck congress- he had to defend himself against the
liberals who were mad- so he innocently says ‘You know- I didn’t agree with
everything in the deal- but when HOSTAGE TAKERS are threatening to hurt the
hostages- than you make the deal’ now- we all know the president did not mean
to send a message to the real hostage takers of the world- telling them ‘yes- I
will deal with you if you start killing off the hostages’ and I heard no
conservative voice accuse him of this [someone might have- I did not hear
anyone so far] - it would be irresponsible to take the political speech of the
president [we’ll bring a gun- hostage takers- etc.] and use that as a political
tool to shame the man- yet that’s exactly what some on the left are doing- I
agree with those on the right and the left who are calling for a step down on
the rhetoric- from both sides- but those who are publicly saying that the
rhetoric from one side is what caused these peoples deaths- that’s being
irresponsible to the max.
[1565] HITCHENS-
BLOOMBERG AND ADAM- Okay- being I’m finishing up my last book, I made the
mistake of going to half price books yesterday- mistake? Yes- I’m going thru
some courses right now on philosophy and really shouldn’t be starting any new
books right now- but heck, I couldn’t help myself. So as my custom goes- my
wife dropped me off [they know better than to wait at the store- I usually take
a few hours] and I begin the obsession. First I go thru all the shelves of the
targeted category [theology, philosophy, etc.] and pluck out the books I think
are relevant. Then when the process is complete I usually purchase 3-5 books
from the collection [yes- I leave the rest on the shelf for the poor book
worker to put back into the proper section]. So anyway as I was walking outside
after the purchase I sat at one of the outside coffee areas where lots of
people usually hang out [you know- the professors- one time there was a guitar
playing hippie singing about the war in Vietnam- in 2009!]. But this day it was
surprisingly empty- only one homeless guy. As I sat to start Christopher
Hitchens best seller ‘god is not great- how religion poisons everything’ I
realized that the reason the spot was empty was because the homeless kid was
sitting there at one of the tables- playing with one of those kids toys- you
shake it back and forth and it claps- and he seemed to be talking to himself.
To be honest- some of these guys are my best friends- I’ve spent thousands of
man hours just hanging out with these brothers over the years. I really didn’t
talk too much- trying to dissect Hitchens- then my wife drove up and beeped the
horn. As I got up to leave- I saw the brother kinda look my way- seemed to be
waiting to see the scared- or violent
type response they usually see- you know ‘stay the hell away from me’ type
thing. I caught his eye and just gave him a friendly ‘hey brother- how you
doing’ he was so glad to be seen as a human being. I walked over and figured
I’d talk for a minute or 2. I didn’t realize it at first, but he was wearing
headphones and listening to music- he wasn’t talking to himself after all. He
told me he was listening to Floyd- I told him I too am a big classic rock fan-
that while living in Jersey I missed their concert in 1979-80 ‘The Wall’. He knew
the year- it was 1980. I just spent a few minutes having a friendly talk with
him- maybe the first real communication he’s had all day- most of these
brothers are nice guys- yet they often struggle with mental issues- he looked
to be in his late 20’s, originally from some northern state- probably headed
south for the winter. As my wife was waiting in the car- beeping the horn-
probably thinking ‘Oh know- another one of his homeless friends’ [yes- I’ve met
hundreds over the years- and they’ve all been to the house many times] I told
my buddy I got to go- he asks ‘what’s your name’? John. Hi John- my name is
Adam. Strange- the man who was made in God’s image- Jesus said ‘in as much as
you helped one of the least- the down and out- you have helped me’.
Okay- once again I really needed to do a post or 2 on
philosophy- before I get too ahead of
myself in the study; but let me make a few comments on Hitchens book
[see- I told you I shouldn’t have hit the book store!] Okay- I’m gonna try and
be nice to Hitchens- he is one of the famous atheist writers of the past few
years- these guys are referred to as ‘the new atheists’ the group consists of
some notable names- Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris- a few others. These guys kind
of became popular in reviving some of the old arguments against religion and
God- most modern readers are not aware that they are simply re-hashing the same
old arguments that have been refuted in the past- and to be honest this bunch
make a whole lotta errors in their thinking/arguments. Most well trained
Christian apologists have thoroughly refuted them. But being Hitchens is dying
[or died? I haven’t checked recently] of cancer- I’ll try and be nice [try!].
Okay- like some of the book reviews I read- Hitchens is crude and mean- and
yes- at times ignorant of his glaring mistakes. He describes a nice old teacher
he had as a youth- as a young boy growing up in England- she taught the
schoolboys about nature and science- and yes- God. I thought he was being nice
telling the story. Then he calls her ‘a pious old trout’. He refers to the sex
abuse scandal that’s rocked the Catholic church- he calls it the ‘no child’s
behind left’ scandal [a takeoff on the no child left behind policy]. So yes,
this book- while containing some real good history- also sounds overly crude.
Hitchens also appeals to mans great intellect and sophistication as being all
we need for true morality- he says man does not need God, religion or the bible
to be moral- after all we have the great works of literature! Sounds good- right?
He then goes on and mentions the names of the great authors- he mentions
Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy among others- and makes the argument ‘see- we have
morality and truth contained within these books without needing religious
truth’- geez- every well read person will tell you that these authors are known
for their books being inundated with religious morality- it’s no secret that
these 2 authors are considered some of the greatest Christian/religious writers
of their time. How Hitchens could appeal to the ethics contained in their
writings and say ‘see- we don’t need religious ethics- we have these guys’. I
mean these types of obvious flaws jump right out at you- to be honest I have
only read the reviews from these famous atheists in the past- but most of the reviews
have pointed stuff like this out- I just didn’t think these guys would be this
‘amateurish’ [geez- don’t want to call the guy an idiot- or an old trout- that
wouldn’t be the Christian thing to do].
So anyway I guess I’ll hit a few high points of the book the next week
or so.
Last- but not least. Have we had our own Greek crisis? Those
of you who follow the news are aware that this last year the European Union has
suffered from a severe debt crisis- many states that make up the union have
struggled to try and cut costs and sure up their economies- Greece, Portugal,
Spain and Ireland are still very much in trouble. So the other healthier
economies in the union [Germany] have put pressure on the weaker ones to get
their houses in order- they refer to this as ‘austerity’ taking measures to
reign in the financial crisis. As a response to these cutbacks- like raising
the retirement age and hiking college tuition- many citizens have taken to the
streets in protest- govt. workers going
on strike and all. People have wondered if stuff like this could happen in the
good old U.S. of A- it looks like it might just have! In sort of sneaky way.
The blizzard that has wreaked havoc on the north east these last few days has
caused problems for N.Y. and N.J. [my old home turf]. The mayor of N.Y. -
Michael Bloomberg- has come under fire for not getting the streets cleared in
time. Word has gotten out that some of the street workers were told by their
bosses ‘go slow in the clean up’ so to put pressure on the mayor to not
eliminate their jobs- sort of like an under the cover strike. If this is true
[we don’t know for sure] then it would be our own workers rebellion against our
austerity measures- while it’s not as bad as what Europe has gone thru- never
the less it’s still bad.
No comments:
Post a Comment