1837- DID THE HILLS CLAP HANDS?
I usually end the week with a
‘week in review [news]’ type thing- but being I posted 2 political things
yesterday- let’s do something spiritual.
The other week I mentioned I just
went thru a course [again] on early Christianity.
The teacher- a famous scholar of
the day- came from a liberal background in scholarship.
I do like the man- though I come
from a different view- I believe the bible is inspired by God- and is ‘the word
of God’.
Now- that statement can be
expanded on- and at times I have done that.
There are Fundamentalist positions
on biblical inspiration that at times leave much to be desired.
The bible has various forms of
literature within it.
Poetry- Apocalyptic [Revelation,
Daniel] - Symbolic- etc.
So inspiration- or reading the
bible ‘literally’ simply means when you read those portions- literally- you
read them as you would any other form of literature in the same class.
Example.
In Psalms [poetry type category]
you read that ‘all the hills clapped their hands and sang’.
Okay- did the writer ‘literally’
mean this?
No- he was using poetry to
describe the majesty of God.
But some people do think these
verses should be read ‘literally’ and that in some way nature ‘clapped hands’.
The same with the book of
Revelation- when we read about the Dragon- or the number of the beast- we
realize these are symbols- or riddles- that we need not take ‘literally’.
Will there be an actual number-
or code- that some future govt. will stamp on people’s heads or hands?
Probably not.
Have there been
teachers/preachers who have taught this kind of thing- who have said ‘we live
in a day like never before- where you can actually mark someone in the
head/hand thru computer chips’.
So you have people who refuse to
get social security cards- or avoid using the computer marker at the grocery
store.
But these ways of looking at the
bible are too simplistic- and don’t fit the actual style of the writer.
Is this the only time in history
when we have the ability to mark people on their bodies?
Of course not- we read in the
bible itself that in the Old Testament they actually ‘branded’ slaves- had ways
to bore a hole in a person’s ear to show he belonged to an owner.
But we never think of this- we
simply accept what we hear and that’s that.
The other day I was talking to a
very knowledgeable man in the bible- he has read it [like me] hundreds of times
over the years.
One time I mentioned to him the
debate [among scholars] over the days of creation we read about in Genesis chapter
1[and 2].
I gave him various ways people interpret
the text.
I said ‘you know- Genesis one
says God created the Sun on day 4- but he made light on day 1’.
Now- I mentioned this as someone
who does take the bible ‘literally’ but who also leaves room that the earth is
much older than 6 thousand years.
To my surprise- my friend never
thought of this ‘problem’.
He asked ‘what day was the sun
made?’
Now- I know he has read the text
a lot- but it never dawned on him that the Genesis account has this ‘problem’.
How do we solve it?
Some say ‘God made another source
of light for the first 3 days’.
Okay- I don’t go for that.
But I do ‘go for’ the possibility
that God is not giving us a scientific account of the creation of the world- be
he is giving us a way we can grasp it- being everyone who reads the text is not
a scientist.
One interesting view is God was
using the 6 day [7] ‘form’ to categorize the order of things.
Day 1- light. Day 3- luminaries
[things that give light]
Day 2- sky, water. Day 4- fish- fowl [things that fill the sky-
water]
Day 3- land- vegetation. Day 5- animals, humans [things that eat the
stuff]
So it seems like the first ‘3
days’ correspond to the things created on the last ‘3days’.
Okay- is this the only way to see
it?
No.
But it shows you that sometimes
there is more to the story than meets the eye.
You say ‘John- I will just take
it like it says- the bible says it- that settles it’.
Actually I’m fine with that- but
the ‘super’ literal way does force the reader to come up with another source of
light for the first 3 days- so that interpretation has its problems as well.
Point?
Just because we have symbol- poetry-
prophecy- and various forms/styles of literature in the bible- this does not
mean the bible is wrong- or ‘full of holes’.
No- it means when we come across
these various styles we leave enough room to interpret them in the style they
were written.
Okay- there’s obviously much that
can be said on this subject- maybe I’ll do more over the next week or so.
Like how we got our bible- the
development of the Canon [how we know which books are in- and which are not
‘in’].
There were other writings that
the early church debated over.
Some of these other writings were
considered out and out lies.
But not all- some of the other
books were considered okay- but for various reasons they did not make it into
the bible.
And a few that made it in were
disputed- for various reasons.
The church did not have a ‘complete’
canon until the 4th century.
It is true that the early Christians
had a basic unanimity on what was in and what was out.
But not until the 4th
century was it decided for sure.
So maybe I’ll do a few posts on
that.
I do come from the ‘conservative’
view on this- I do believe the bible is ‘the word of God’.
But that does not always mean you
take every verse ‘literally’ in the sense that the ‘hills clapped their hands’-
Got it?
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
No comments:
Post a Comment