1828- CLEVELAND BRIDGE IS FALLING
DOWN
So we had the 5 guys- described
as ‘anarchists upset with corporate greed and the govt.’ who got caught trying
to blow up a Cleveland bridge.
Yes- they had the fake plastic c-4
that the undercover FBI agent gave them.
They planted the stuff at the
base of the bridge- and they entered the code that they thought would blow it
up.
Nothing happened- and they got
busted.
As I read the article [actually a
couple] I found it interesting that these men did call themselves part of the
Occupy Wall street group.
They held to the same beliefs [absent
bridge bombing] and by all accounts were what you could reasonably describe as
‘Occupiers’.
Now- I know that all occupiers do
not hold to these views.
But the article went on to state
that part of the motivation of these men was the downright unwillingness for
the ‘regular’ occupiers to engage in violence.
What?
Yes- not only were these 5 musketeers not
‘really’ occupiers- but part of their motivation to bomb the bridge was their
frustration that the regular occupiers are so darn non violent!
I remember when the media covered
the Tea Party crowd- you had accusations that they were Terrorists- even though
they actually did not engage in bridge bombing.
When there was an accusation that
one of them said ‘nigger’ or possibly spit on a Black man- did the media report
that these offenders were not really Tea Partiers?
Did they say part of the
motivation was the ‘downright unwillingness for regular tea partiers to engage
in racial prejudice’.
No- even though the tea party
made it clear that they did not hold these views- if you had anyone associated
with the group engage in bad behavior- then the media simply reported it as tea
party activity- which would be right.
When the crazy guy shot the
Arizona congresswoman Gifford’s- the media spent a week debating whether or not
the phrase ‘target’ used by Sarah Palin might have led to the shooting.
Now- we have had the president
going around the country- making speech after speech about how the rich are not
paying their fair share- how corporate big wigs are screwing everyone else.
You have the class warfare card that
the president has been using- inciting real anger and frustration in people.
Do you think this language- this constant
drumbeat- from the president himself- do you think it might have played a role
in the general anger that you see in the occupiers?
Have we spent a week [or even 1
day] asking the nation ‘do you think this 99 versus 1 % language might have
played a role’?
No- no questions like this are
being asked.
Not only that- but the media have
reported that one of the reasons for these bridge bombers anger- was the
absolute non violence of the occupiers.
Yeah- if a guy who was a member
of the tea party- who had tea party associations on Facebook- who held to all
the views of a tea partier- yeah- if he lynched a Black guy- I’m sure the media
would report ‘he lynched him because he was so upset with the true love that
the real tea partiers have for Black people’.
Yeah- I’m sure that’s what they
would say- aren’t you?
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
No comments:
Post a Comment