1869- THE GOD PARTICLE [and Mayan
flag day]
Hope you ‘all’ had a good 4th
of July.
I actually flew the flag for the
2nd time in so many months.
For years I never had a house
flag- I hung them up daily at the fire dept for 25 years and it never dawned on
me to get one.
So when I woke up on Memorial Day
and saw my neighbor’s flag flying high- yea- it made me feel like a commie.
So I went and bought a flag.
I asked my wife- ‘where did you
put the flag’ ‘it’s in the closet’.
I get the flag- it’s around 7 or
so- and I walk back into the room ‘let’s go hang the flag’.
My wife says ‘what do you mean-
you need 2 people to hang it’?
No.
But I want you to stand next to me and recite
the pledge.
I thought it was funny- she
didn’t seem to think so.
Yeah- I’m one of those types that
get the most use out of a purchase as possible.
I’ll probably be flying it on
that Mayan calendar day- I think it’s coming up pretty soon?
So- as I debated about what we
should discuss today- I picked up the paper [yesterday morning] and the front
page headline read ‘JUSTICE DEPT SUES CITY’.
I mentioned this the other day-
about the fire dept not hiring enough women [they say].
I read about half of the article-
I read the stats- we actually hired more women than other comparable cities.
I really did not want to do
another whole post on the thing- but it was sad to see that as a front page
headline- I don’t think we have ever been sued by our own govt. before.
[in the post the other day- I
think I used the word threat- maybe not- but now I know they did sue].
I have written about our attorney
general before- Eric Holder- this guy has politicized the justice dept to no
end.
I could give you example after
example- even his past dealings are very shady- the Mark Rich pardon- a pardon
he recommended when he worked in the Clinton days.
By all accounts- Clinton pardoned
a crook because he had connections- Holder used his influence to get the dirty
deed done.
Pure- 100% Chicago politics-
corrupt to the core.
Okay- instead- let’s do the other
big news story- the so called God Particle.
Yeah- I heard/read a bunch of
stories on the so called breakthrough discovery.
Now- I am not ‘anti science’.
I am not a person who believes
the earth is only 6 thousand years old- or that kids rode on the backs of
dinosaurs.
But- in the historic setting of
apologetics- and the role that science has played in the debate- I must say
there are lots of misconceptions floating around in the air.
Okay- a brief history of the scientific
method and how it came to be.
The past year or so I covered
lots of posts on philosophy and physics and world history in general.
We covered how during the middle
of the last millennium [500years ago] the world began a break thru in many
areas- and we often refer to this as the modern era.
Man- science- thought- all of the
fields we see as part of the modern era- they began at around this point.
Science/philosophy and religion
all played a big role in the debate.
One of the big boys was a man
named David Hume- he was a thinker who questioned what we talked about the
other day- the law of cause and effect.
This law simply says that every
effect has a cause.
Hume challenged the popular idea
that we can know causes.
He said we think we can know the cause
of something- but in reality we can’t be sure.
The example Hume gave was the
Pool table.
He said we see a person hit the q
ball- the ball hits another ball and it goes into the pocket.
Hume said it might look like this
a string of cause and effects- but we don’t know for sure.
Maybe there are other reasons why
the balls are reacting like this.
Another famous example is the
Rooster crowing- the guy couldn’t sleep in because the sun kept shinning in his
window- so every morning right before the sun rose he heard the darn rooster
crow.
So he shot the rooster.
Just because one act precedes another- this
does not mean that is the cause.
Okay- we got it Hume.
But some began to doubt all
possible knowledge- they said you can’t make any judgments at all- because we
don’t know for sure what the real cause is.
Okay- this led another great
thinker- Kant- to challenge Hume [the famous quote from Kant was ‘he woke up
out of his dogmatic slumber’] and Kant said even though we can’t be 100 % sure-
yet for any possibility for science to function- we do need to be able to have
some type of way we can settle on knowledge- science does need to be able to
say ‘okay- we have looked at this long enough- we think this is what’s causing
this’.
Okay- this whole debate is called
Epistemology- how we know stuff.
Now- the God particle.
As I listened to the various reports
the last 2 days- I could tell right off the bat that there was some funny stuff
going on.
The actual statements form the
scientists are saying ‘well- we haven’t ACTUALLY seen the particle [also called
Higgs Boson] but- we have detected enough other particles- so we think the
Boson is more than likely there too’ or ‘it’s like looking in the distance- and
you think you see someone- but maybe you’re looking at his twin instead’.
Okay- what kind of argument is this?
This is what we call a
Metaphysical argument.
It’s an argument that is made-
not because you actually detected the thing- but you have come to a conclusion
based on the Scientific Method of Induction/Deduction.
You looked at- observed- and
tested various things- and you now say ‘well- it must be there- because look at
all the other stuff’. [layman’s terms].
Okay- is there anything wrong
with this.
Not really.
But- here’s the catch- many in
the modern field of physics refute the argument for the existence of God
because in the end it is a metaphysical one.
That is- the materialist scientist
[one who says we only deal in facts that we can actually see\detect] uses
metaphysical arguments all the time- he just does not realize he is doing this.
Remember the other day- I posted
about the many contradictions good men make when mixing science with
apologetics and the laws of argumentation [or logic].
They often do not realize they
are contradicting themselves- or making out right nonsense statements- because
they are scientists- not logicians.
So what we have in the Higgs Boson
case- in the Dark Matter- Dark energy case- in the entire Multi Verse theory
[many universes].
In all these theories- which now
make up the majority of modern physics- they are all the same type of argument
that the materialist scientist says are not good arguments- at least when it
comes to the argument for the existence of God.
In a nutshell- if we agree to
accept that a certain particle must exist- not because we have actually detected
it- but because ‘well- it must be there- because if not- then how do we explain
everything else’?
If these arguments are being used
in all of the above scenarios- and trust me- they are.
Then we can’t exclude the Theist
from the table- we can’t say ‘no- you silly Christian- you deal in things we
DON’T SEE- we deal in things we do see.’
Actually- you don’t.
All of the above theories are conclusions
based on how the other things around them respond.
The reason many think Dark Matter
exists- is not because we have found it- we haven’t.
But because in order for the
standard model- well- to stand- then Dark Matter simply ‘must be’.
Okay- this is the same type of
argument the Theist [one who believes in God] uses.
If you want to exclude the believer
from the table- on the grounds that he appeals to a ‘non detectable’ being.
Then we must ditch all of the
above.
And it seems- Higgs Boson too.
NOTE- all scientists are not
materialists- many are believers- and even many non believers are not
materialists. If you are a pure
materialist scientist- one who says we cannot accept any other non material
arguments [things we don’t actually see/detect] then you also would not be able
to accept any of the major theories of physics today- that is if you were
consistent in your thinking.
Also why did the researchers at
CERN release this as some great new finding?
The ‘discovery’ was made at the
new 10 billion dollar Hadron Collider.
This is the world’s largest Atom
smasher.
In order for the Europeans to
justify the cost- they had to convince people that this was the best chance to actually
discover this long elusive particle.
Now- Europe is in a near
depression- as most of you know.
This underground ‘particle smashing
tunnel’ [I think it’s right on the French Swiss border?] when first opened- had
a bad day.
It leaked oil into the tunnel and
it was shut down- and had to be repaired at the cost of millions of dollars.
Okay- all of these guys realize-
if you do not justify the cost of this thing- in the midst of a European
depression- then what are the odds that your gonna keep getting funded?
I don’t know if this was the main
reason they came out with the statement now- but for them to have come out- and
kinda have fudged on it- makes me wonder.
Note- Do me a favor, those who
read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read
them on. Thanks- John. Don’t forget to ‘click’ the note App on my Facebook
Profile- I have posted lots.
No comments:
Post a Comment